중국 근대 대(對) 조선 서사 기록과 문학적 형상화 연구 - 황준헌(黃遵憲)ㆍ주가록(周家祿)ㆍ장건(張謇)의 중한관계 저작과 시문을 중심으로
A study on Chinese modern epic records of Joseon Dynasty and its literary embodiment: focused on the literary works about the relationship between Korea and China written by HuangZunXianㆍZhouJiaLuㆍZhangJian
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper analyses relationship between the Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty during modern transition on 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種 (AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe)』 and poetry and prose which were written by HuangZunXian(1848-1905)ㆍZhouJiaLu(1846-1909)ㆍ ZhangJian(1853-1926). It considers these works located on the center of shaping new alternation in East Asia as vivid records. The study, specifically, examines (1) Chinese policy of Joseon strategy (2) Search on process of forming modern discourse in East Asia (3) Analyse epic records of the Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose on chinese recognition of Joseon and identify of forming modern history. And it takes view of macro-framework under form and process of modern discourse in East Asia. Firstly, the paper is a comprehensive analysis of literary works on the relationship between Korea and China and poetry and prose such as 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』 ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種(AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe), and then studies on how it changed and what was the changing process. Secondly, it examines the process of forming modern discourse in East Asia, the recognition for intellectuals of Qing and Joseon Dynasty about a convulsion of East Asia situation, and the countermeasure against that situation. Last but not least, HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian left more than a few poetry and prose which were the problems and destiny of the Joseon Dynasty as topic and interacted with writers of that period. The study focuses on their literary works to search the chinese intellectuals of Joseon recognition and identity of forming modern history.The Im-o Military Revolt(壬午軍亂) which plays important background in political and period about epic records of Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose is not only a local problem at that time. It arose from transition between Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty in traditional chinese world order system and western influence on East and emerging Japan. In addition, Qing Dynasty made the best use of Joseon Dynasty situation to defense Russia that moved southward. Thus, chinese policy of Joseon strategy focused on keeping traditional chinese world order system. And it caused international dispute with status of Joseon Dynasty. On the other hand, literary works on the relationship between Korea and China which were written by HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian revealed chinese view on modern transition of the Joseon Dynasty with diversified recognition. It could be said that Joseon and Qing had the same identify of forming modern history in terms of the recognition that are traditional master-servant relationship between two countries, causes and solutions of Joseon Dynasty decline, key figures who were Heungseon Daewongun, Queen Min, Gojong and civil servants, writers, and strenuous efforts in the Joseon Dynasty.
Abstract
The paper analyses relationship between the Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty during modern transition on 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種 (AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe)』 and poetry and prose which were written by HuangZunXian(1848-1905)ㆍZhouJiaLu(1846-1909)ㆍ ZhangJian(1853-1926). It considers these works located on the center of shaping new alternation in East Asia as vivid records. The study, specifically, examines (1) Chinese policy of Joseon strategy (2) Search on process of forming modern discourse in East Asia (3) Analyse epic records of the Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose on chinese recognition of Joseon and identify of forming modern history. And it takes view of macro-framework under form and process of modern discourse in East Asia. Firstly, the paper is a comprehensive analysis of literary works on the relationship between Korea and China and poetry and prose such as 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』 ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種(AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe), and then studies on how it changed and what was the changing process. Secondly, it examines the process of forming modern discourse in East Asia, the recognition for intellectuals of Qing and Joseon Dynasty about a convulsion of East Asia situation, and the countermeasure against that situation. Last but not least, HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian left more than a few poetry and prose which were the problems and destiny of the Joseon Dynasty as topic and interacted with writers of that period. The study focuses on their literary works to search the chinese intellectuals of Joseon recognition and identity of forming modern history.The Im-o Military Revolt(壬午軍亂) which plays important background in political and period about epic records of Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose is not only a local problem at that time. It arose from transition between Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty in traditional chinese world order system and western influence on East and emerging Japan. In addition, Qing Dynasty made the best use of Joseon Dynasty situation to defense Russia that moved southward. Thus, chinese policy of Joseon strategy focused on keeping traditional chinese world order system. And it caused international dispute with status of Joseon Dynasty. On the other hand, literary works on the relationship between Korea and China which were written by HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian revealed chinese view on modern transition of the Joseon Dynasty with diversified recognition. It could be said that Joseon and Qing had the same identify of forming modern history in terms of the recognition that are traditional master-servant relationship between two countries, causes and solutions of Joseon Dynasty decline, key figures who were Heungseon Daewongun, Queen Min, Gojong and civil servants, writers, and strenuous efforts in the Joseon Dynasty.
참고문헌 (61)
- 黃遵憲, "朝鮮策略", ~
- 陳錚, "黃遵憲全集" (2005), 中華書局
- 周家祿, "奧簃朝鮮三種" (1882), 申報館叢書本
- 周家祿, "壽愷堂集" (1967), 文海出版社
- 張謇硏究中心, "張謇全集" (1994), 江蘇古籍出版社
- "張季子九錄", 上海書店
- 金昌熙, "三籌合存", ~
- 黃遵憲, "조선책략" (1977), 건국대학교 출판부
- 김승일, "조선책략" (2007), 범우사
- 章開沅, "開拓者的足跡-張謇傳稿" (1986), 中華書局
- 劉厚生, "張謇傳記" (1985), 上海書店
- 賴芳伶, "淸末小說與社會政治變遷" (1994), 大安出版社
- 張福貴, "中日近現代文學關係比較硏究" (1999), 吉林大學出版社
- 李喜所, "中國近代社會與文化硏究" (2003), 人民出版社
- 楊立强, "淸末民初資産階級與社會變動" (2003), 上海人民出版社
- 楊昭全, "中國-朝鮮ㆍ韓國文化交流史 1-4" (2004), 昆崙出版社
- 魏朝勇, "民國時期文學的政治想像" (2006), 華夏出版社
- 單正平, "晩淸民族主義與文學轉型" (2006), 人民出版社
- 葉乾坤, "양계초와 구한말 문학" (1980), 법전출판사
- 조동일, "동아시아문학사비교론" (1993), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이광린, "개화기연구" (1994), 일조각
- 최원식, "동아시아인의 ‘동양’ 인식-19~20세기" (1997), 문학과 지성사
- 구선회, "한국 근대 對淸 정책사 연구" (1999), 혜안
- 김시준, "한반도와 중국 동북 3성의 역사문화" (1999), 서울대학교 출판부
- 백영서, "동아시아의 귀환-중국의 근대성을 묻는다" (2000), 창작과 비평사
- 우림걸, "한국개화기문학과 양계초" (2002), 박이정
- 전형준, "동아시아적 시각으로 바라보는 중국문학" (2004), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이종민, "근대 중국의 문학적 사유 읽기" (2004), 소명출판
- 신승하, "근대중국: 개혁과 혁명 (상․하)" (2004), 대명출판사
- 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원, "동아시아 서사학의 전통과 근대" (2005)
- 홍석표, "중국의 근대적 문학의식 탄생" (2007), 북코리아
- 현광호, "한국 근대 사상가의 동아시아 인식" (2009), 선인
- 이해영, "문명의 충격과 근대동아시아의 전환" (2012), 경진
- 이종민, "흩어진 모래 : 현대 중국인의 고뇌와 꿈" (2013), 산지니
- 정재규, "黃遵憲 『朝鮮策略』의 韓末政局에 미친 影響에 관한 연구", pp.1973
- 최종세, "황준헌과 그의 기사시에 대한 소고", 중어중문학, 5 (1983)
- 최종세, "黃遵憲 詩의 淵源", 中國語文論叢, 4 (1991)
- 강동훈, "黃遵憲 詩 硏究: 現實認識을 中心으로", pp.1989
- 鄭斗音, "黃遵憲의 東아시아 認識: 對日本·朝鮮 認識을 中心", 석사, 사학, pp.1989
- 유춘근, "幕友 張謇과 袁世凱", 중앙사론, 6 (1989)
- 주승택, "姜瑋와 黃遵憲의 만남", 중한인문과학연구회 국제학술대회 (2002)
- 이등연, "중국 근대 시기 詩歌에 나타난 朝鮮 문제 인식", 중국인문과학, (29), pp.311~339 (2004), 중국인문학회
- 이등연, "周家祿 朝鮮樂府", 중국인문과학, (34), pp.523~548 (2006), 중국인문학회
- 于明燕, "황준헌의 『조선책략』과 조선의 반향 : 이문화수용과 위정척사를 중심으로", 석사, 비교문화, pp.2006
- 김용태, "임오군란기 한중(韓中) 문인의 교유 양상-조면호(趙冕鎬)?김창희(金昌熙)의 활동을 중심으로-", 漢文學報, 17(1), pp.499~525 (2007), 우리한문학회
- 楊鳳霞, "황준헌 시가 연구 : 한·중·일 삼국 시사 관련 작품을 중심으로", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2009
- 김수자, "黃遵憲의 『朝鮮策略』에 나타난 朝鮮自强策과 ‘地域’의식", 동양고전연구, (40), pp.277~305 (2010), 동양고전학회
- 김성남, "吳長慶軍營과 그 막료들 ―조선 견문록 3종을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (74), pp.321~350 (2011), 대동문화연구원
- 하정원, "1882년 전후 東아시아論의 形成과 朝鮮 지식인의 反應", 동방한문학, (51), pp.165~198 (2012), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 정해리, "近代 韓․中 文化交流 小考", 중국인문과학, (50), pp.371~390 (2012), 중국인문학회[DOI]
- 천금매, "壬午軍亂時期 韓中 文士들의 文化交流", 한국학논집, (50), pp.37~68 (2013), 한국학연구원
- 천금매, "石菱 金昌熙와 南通 文人 張謇의 交流 - 임오군란 직후 교류척독을 중심으로-", 열상고전연구, (39), pp.125~157 (2014), 열상고전연구회
- 배경한, "黃遵憲의 『朝鮮策略』과 ‘아시아주의’", 동양사학연구, (127), pp.303~340 (2014), 동양사학회
- 최우길, "임오군란 직후 淸종군인사들의 조선 내정 개혁안 - 새 자료 『三籌合存』 독해를 중심으로", 열상고전연구, (39), pp.62~97 (2014), 열상고전연구회
- 공소라, "황준헌의 『조선책략』을 통해 본 19세기말 중국과 조선", pp.2015
- 노관범, "1880년대 金昌熙의 經世思想 - 임오군란 직후 부강정책의 재설정 -", 한국사상사학, (35), pp.65~97 (2010), 한국사상사학회
- 夏東波, "張謇與吳長慶", 江淮文史 (2007)
- 王光銀, "略論張謇的外交活動", 杭州師範學院學報, (1) (1999)
- 章開沅, "張謇與中韓文化交流", 華中師範大學學報, 39(6) (2000)
- 魏明樞, "論黃遵憲的『朝鮮策略』", 江西師範大學學報, 37(2) (2004)
- 張靜, "論黃遵憲的『朝鮮策略』與近代朝鮮的開放", 南開學報, (2) (2007)
