본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1890-1910년대 한국 근대 매체 속에투영된 타자로서의 중국 심상(心像) 연구

A study on the image of China from 1890-1910 as reflected in modern Korean media from the other person’s point of view

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study starts from the prerequisite that it is necessary to expand the literary text in order to understand the perception of the period of the modern public area between 'Korea' and 'Modern' in the 1890-1910s. During this period, many epic literary works with the character of the narratives were appeared in the modern media such as newspapers and magazines. In particular, the intellectuals of this period tried to present their arguments with the spaces and devices called 'modern' and 'medium' while suggested a paradigm to cope with the crisis of the times. Based on this prerequisite, this study has the following two purposes and implications. First, exploring the expansion of China's research area is incorporated into a field of Korean and Chinese modern literature by paying attention to the distinct characteristic of the period such as '1890-1910', 'Korea' 'modern' and to the literary specificity of the image of China in the media and the newspaper. Second, we explore China as projected into the other in narrative literature, and then look closely at the Chinese cognitive system of Korea in the modern order of East Asia. This is the discussion of how the mechanism of 'China' was perceived and operated in the process of communicating with the discourse of 'people', 'modern nation state' and 'civilization flowering'. Specifically, this study examines the image of China as projected into the other in the Korean modern media from 1890 to 1910, 1) Acceptance of civilization flowering and China as the other. 2) China as self-establishment of nation and as the other. and 3) The institutionalization of the establishing the modern nation state and China as the other. First, Acceptance of civilization flowering and China as the other. In modern times, the Joseon Dynasty began to recognize Western civilization as a universal civilization. As a result, the discourse of Western civilization acted as a dominant framework of recognition that excludes the traditional meaning of "Chinese" while dismantled the traditional order of the Joseon Dynasty and transformed the society. Therefore, media such as newspapers and magazines in this period devoted a lot of space to the contents of 'Blooming', 'Boom', 'Civilization' and 'Barbarism' In this process, if the civilized and the blooming countries represented by the United States and Japan were set as positive some, China, other semi-armed states and barbarians were set as negative others. In particular, China functioned as a lesson and a negative image to Korea.Second, it is China as self-establishment of nation and as the other. The most remarkable of the discourses of civilization in this period was the establishment of 'nation' which is the core of the modern country. In particular, self-determination as a 'nation' had led to the expectation of the birth of a new concept of 'modern nation state'. Therefore, it is early days to criticize the reality of the period and to emphasize the self-establishment of nation. However, the image of China and Chinese people projected into the media were negative at that time. Chinese and Chinese performed their role as a lesson to the Joseon Dynasty and were represented as negative the others. It can be said that it used the appropriate mature national consciousness which was suitable for the modern nation and shaped the concrete self-establishment as the nation. Third, it is the institutionalization of the establishing of the modern nation state and China as the other. In general, the core interest of intellectuals in the era of crisis is concentrated on the search for a new social order which is appropriate on the period. And it leads to the proposition of the establishment of a modern nation state. Especially, considering the situation of the Joseon Dynasty in 1890-1910, enlightenment for civilization, blooming, and even the ultimate goal of nation state was essential. And this was embodied as emphasizing the institutionalization of establishing of the modern nation state, the sense of sovereignty, the will of independence and the fair enforcement of modern legal system. In this process, through various works, it is confirmed that China as the other to the Joseon Dynasty was no exception. The emergence of epic literary works reflecting the image of China was possible in the main media of Korea since China traveled outside modern civilization and institutionalization as Korea did during this period. In other words, it can be said through the process of spreading the public opinion being effective by propagating the consciousness of the crisis of the times and enlightening the people, 'China' was described as the other in the narratives. By utilizing it appropriately in the narratives, Korea could propagate civilization and take the effect of enlightenment such as conversion of national consciousness. Furthermore, it presented a new spirit of the establishment of a nation state.

Abstract

This study starts from the prerequisite that it is necessary to expand the literary text in order to understand the perception of the period of the modern public area between 'Korea' and 'Modern' in the 1890-1910s. During this period, many epic literary works with the character of the narratives were appeared in the modern media such as newspapers and magazines. In particular, the intellectuals of this period tried to present their arguments with the spaces and devices called 'modern' and 'medium' while suggested a paradigm to cope with the crisis of the times. Based on this prerequisite, this study has the following two purposes and implications. First, exploring the expansion of China's research area is incorporated into a field of Korean and Chinese modern literature by paying attention to the distinct characteristic of the period such as '1890-1910', 'Korea' 'modern' and to the literary specificity of the image of China in the media and the newspaper. Second, we explore China as projected into the other in narrative literature, and then look closely at the Chinese cognitive system of Korea in the modern order of East Asia. This is the discussion of how the mechanism of 'China' was perceived and operated in the process of communicating with the discourse of 'people', 'modern nation state' and 'civilization flowering'. Specifically, this study examines the image of China as projected into the other in the Korean modern media from 1890 to 1910, 1) Acceptance of civilization flowering and China as the other. 2) China as self-establishment of nation and as the other. and 3) The institutionalization of the establishing the modern nation state and China as the other. First, Acceptance of civilization flowering and China as the other. In modern times, the Joseon Dynasty began to recognize Western civilization as a universal civilization. As a result, the discourse of Western civilization acted as a dominant framework of recognition that excludes the traditional meaning of "Chinese" while dismantled the traditional order of the Joseon Dynasty and transformed the society. Therefore, media such as newspapers and magazines in this period devoted a lot of space to the contents of 'Blooming', 'Boom', 'Civilization' and 'Barbarism' In this process, if the civilized and the blooming countries represented by the United States and Japan were set as positive some, China, other semi-armed states and barbarians were set as negative others. In particular, China functioned as a lesson and a negative image to Korea.Second, it is China as self-establishment of nation and as the other. The most remarkable of the discourses of civilization in this period was the establishment of 'nation' which is the core of the modern country. In particular, self-determination as a 'nation' had led to the expectation of the birth of a new concept of 'modern nation state'. Therefore, it is early days to criticize the reality of the period and to emphasize the self-establishment of nation. However, the image of China and Chinese people projected into the media were negative at that time. Chinese and Chinese performed their role as a lesson to the Joseon Dynasty and were represented as negative the others. It can be said that it used the appropriate mature national consciousness which was suitable for the modern nation and shaped the concrete self-establishment as the nation. Third, it is the institutionalization of the establishing of the modern nation state and China as the other. In general, the core interest of intellectuals in the era of crisis is concentrated on the search for a new social order which is appropriate on the period. And it leads to the proposition of the establishment of a modern nation state. Especially, considering the situation of the Joseon Dynasty in 1890-1910, enlightenment for civilization, blooming, and even the ultimate goal of nation state was essential. And this was embodied as emphasizing the institutionalization of establishing of the modern nation state, the sense of sovereignty, the will of independence and the fair enforcement of modern legal system. In this process, through various works, it is confirmed that China as the other to the Joseon Dynasty was no exception. The emergence of epic literary works reflecting the image of China was possible in the main media of Korea since China traveled outside modern civilization and institutionalization as Korea did during this period. In other words, it can be said through the process of spreading the public opinion being effective by propagating the consciousness of the crisis of the times and enlightening the people, 'China' was described as the other in the narratives. By utilizing it appropriately in the narratives, Korea could propagate civilization and take the effect of enlightenment such as conversion of national consciousness. Furthermore, it presented a new spirit of the establishment of a nation state.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. "독립신문(영인본)", 독립신문영인간행회, ~ (1991)
  2. "협셩회회보, 매일신문(영인본)", 한국신문연구소, ~ (1977)
  3. "대한매일신보(영인본)", 한국신문연구소, ~ (1994)
  4. "皇城新聞" (1994), 경인문화사
  5. "제국신문" (1986), 아세아문화사
  6. 김영민, "근대계몽기 단형 서사문학 자료전집1-2" (2003), 소명출판
  7. 楊昭全, "中國-朝鮮ㆍ韓國文化交流史 1-4" (2004), 昆崙出版社
  8. 陳平原, "中國現代小說的起點-淸末民初小說硏究" (2005), 北京大學出版社
  9. 魏朝勇, "民國時期文學的政治想像" (2006), 華夏出版社
  10. 單正平, "晩淸民族主義與文學轉型" (2006), 人民出版社
  11. 阿英著, "中國近代小說史" (1987), 정음사
  12. 魯迅, "中國小說史略" (1987), 學硏社
  13. 김병도, "신문기자가 본 중국" (1950), 서울문화사
  14. 김윤식, "한국근대문학사연구" (1973), 일지사
  15. 이재선, "한국 개화기 소설연구" (1982), 일조각
  16. 조동일, "한국문학통사" (1989), 지식산업사
  17. 권영민, "한국 근대문학과 시대정신" (1983), 문예출판사
  18. 권영민, "한국현대문학사1" (2002), 민음사
  19. 최원식, "한국근대소설사론" (1986), 창작사
  20. 한원영, "한국 개화기 신문연재소설연구" (1990), 일지사
  21. 김영택, "한국 근대 소설론" (1991), 민지사
  22. 최원식, "동아시아인의 ‘동양’ 인식-19~20세기" (1997), 문학과 지성사
  23. 정선태, "개화기 신문 논설의 서사 수용 양상" (1999), 소명출판
  24. 정선태, "근대의 어둠을 응시하는 고양이의 시선" (2006), 소명출판
  25. 백영서, "동아시아의 귀환-중국의 근대성을 묻는다" (2000), 창작과 비평사
  26. 윤정헌, "韓國近代小說論考" (2001), 국학자료원
  27. 양문규, "한국 근대소설과 현실 인식의 역사" (2002), 소명출판
  28. 니시카와 나가오, "국민이라는 괴물" (2002), 소명출판
  29. 이승원, "국민국가의 정치적 상상력" (2003), 소명출판
  30. 전형준, "동아시아적 시각으로 바라보는 중국문학" (2004), 서울대학교 출판부
  31. 김영민, "한국 근대소설사" (2003), 솔
  32. 김영민, "한국 근대 서사양식의 발생 및 전개와 매체의 역할" (2005), 소명출판
  33. 이종민, "근대 중국의 문학적 사유 읽기" (2004), 소명출판
  34. 민족문학사연구소, "한국 근대문학의 형성과 문학 장의 재발견" (2004), 소명출판
  35. 이화여대 한국문화연구원, "근대계몽기 지식개념의 수용과 그 변용" (2004), 소명출판
  36. 서울시립대학교 인문과학연구소, "한국 근대문학과 민족-국가 담론" (2005), 소명출판
  37. 홍석표, "중국의 근대적 문학의식 탄생" (2007), 북코리아
  38. 이희정, "한국 근대소설의 형성과 매일신보" (2008), 소명출판
  39. 현광호, "한국 근대 사상가의 동아시아 인식" (2009), 선인
  40. 이해영, "문명의 충격과 근대동아시아의 전환" (2012), 경진
  41. 미야지마 히로시, "동아시아에서 세계를 보면? : 역사의 길목에 선 동아시아 지식인들" (2017), 너머북스
  42. 전인갑, "1920年代新聞ㆍ雜誌論說을 통해 본 韓國人의 中國認識의 性格: 五ㆍ三○運動에 關한 東亞日報의 論說을 中心으로", 서울大東洋史學科論集, 11 (1987), 서울대학교 동양사학과
  43. 백영서, "大韓帝國期韓國言論의 中國認識", 歷史學報, 153 (1997)
  44. 김세호, "1920년대 한국 언론의 중국국민혁명에 대한 반응 : 동아일보 특파원 주요한의"신중국 방문기"취재(1928. 10-1929. 1)를 중심으로", 중국학보, 40 (1999)
  45. 조재곤, "한말 조선 지식인의 동아시아 삼국제휴 인식과 논리", 역사와 현실, 37 (2000)
  46. 李在鈴, "南京國民政府시기 韓國言論의 中國認識", 중국학논총, (15), pp.285~307 (2003), 한국중국문화학회
  47. 배경한, "中國亡命시기(1910-1925) 朴殷植의언론활동과 중국인식-『香江雜誌』, 『國是報』, 『四民報』의 분석-", 동방학지, (121), pp.227~270 (2003), 국학연구원
  48. 한기형, "근대 초기 한국인의 동아시아 인식― <청춘>과 <개벽>의 자료를 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (50), pp.167~198 (2005), 대동문화연구원
  49. 최승현, "역사적 분석을 통한 한국과 중국의 상호인식 연구", 중국인문과학, (33), pp.425~442 (2006), 중국인문학회
  50. 김진호, "근·현대 한국인의 중국 인식(認識)과 중국인의 한국 인식 변화", 중국문화연구, (8), pp.373~398 (2006), 중국문화연구학회
  51. 김성욱, "1920년대 韓國小說에 나타난 中國人‘形象’연구 ― 소설의 공간 차이에 따른 양상을 중심으로", 한국언어문화, (34), pp.111~137 (2007), 한국언어문화학회
  52. 남춘애, "한국 문학에 반영된 중국 문화 형상 연구 ―한국 근대 소설을 중심으로", 현대문학이론연구, (47), pp.179~198 (2011), 현대문학이론학회
  53. 정문상, "근현대 한국인의 중국 인식의 궤적", 한국근대문학연구, (25), pp.203~231 (2012), 한국근대문학회
  54. 백영서, "중국의 ‘동북공정’과 한국인의 중국인식의 변화 ― 대중과 역사학계에 미친 영향을 중심으로 ―", 중국근현대사연구, (58), pp.55~85 (2013), 중국근현대사학회
  55. 최학송, "한국 근대 문학과 베이징", 한국학연구, (31), pp.305~330 (2013), 한국학연구소
  56. 류창진, "한국 근대전환기 ‘중국’ 제재 서사문학 연구: 근대 매체를 중심으로", 중국인문과학, (62), pp.353~376 (2016), 중국인문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)