근대 중화질서의 재편과 조선 인식의 변용: 마건충(馬建忠)의 『東行三錄』을 중심으로
Reorganization of the Modern Sinocentrism and Transformation in the recognition of Joseon: focusing on 『Dongxingsanlu(東行三錄)』 written by MaJianZhong
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the 19th century, Korea, China, and Japan faced different value systems, such as pressure and civilization from Western powers. In other words, we experienced a paradigm shift from the Chinese order represented by the “concept of courtesy” to the modern international order based on the “concept of national equality”. On the premise of this point, MaJianZhong's 『東行三錄』 is a vivid record that stood at the very center of the establishment of a new order in East Asia based on the periodic and political background of modern China and Joseon. Therefore, this study attempted to clarify the reorganization of the modern Chinese order, the response of China, the transformation of the perception of Joseon, and the modern transformation of the relationship between Korea and China through a political intent on 『東行三錄』. One of the pillars of 『東行三錄』 is the reorganization of the modern Chinese order and China's response. In the 19th century, China faced the Western powers in earnest through a new way of bargaining between countries, defined as a “treaty system”. And this appears in the form of a challenge to the traditional sovereignty of Chinese countries, in other words, in the form of denial and reorganization of the traditional international order in East Asia. In the process of mediating and signing a treaty between Joseon and Western powers such as the US, Britain, France, and Germany, MaJianZhong focused on obtaining the approval of the Qing's sustenance over Joseon. The traditional relationship between Qing and Joseon was order of courtesy represented by tributary appointment relationship, but the Qing did not directly engage in Joseon's internal affairs and diplomacy. The relationship between the two countries was different from the relationship between the suzerain country and the subordinate country in the exercise of the sovereignty stipulated in international law. In order to overcome this reality, China attempted to change from order of courtesy to a relationship between actual domination and subjugation, and further stipulate the rules of subordination within the treaty between Joseon and Western powers. Through this process, China was able to pursue a transition to a practical immediate release policy. Another pillar of 『東行三錄』 is the transformation of Joseon consciousness and the modern transition process of Korea-China relations. Establishment of treaty relations between Joseon and Western powers meant that the traditional relationship, gyorin was practically ended. MaJianZhong's perception of Joseon is based on this periodic and political process. Therefore, this study analyzes the process recorded in 『東行三錄』 into the recognition of traditional Joseon-China relations, the modernization of Joseon, and the recognition of the Im-O Military Revolt and Lee Haeung. Moreover, the conversion of Korea-China relations was identified. In connection with the modern transformation of the relations between Korea and China, China imposed a new form of “tributary state” system on Joseon. In particular, the political and military external pressure exerted by China after the Im-O Military Revolt was a decisive factor that hindered Joseon's transition to modern society. In addition, this "tributary state" system interfered with both internal and external affairs of Joseon. Moreover, the Qing's rule of thumb followed the Western imperialist state's domination, which is the colonial rule. Considering these points, MaJianZhong's 『東行三錄』 shows the coexistence and confrontation between the tributary appointment relationship and the modern international order amid a common perception of the modern destiny of both Korea and China.
Abstract
In the 19th century, Korea, China, and Japan faced different value systems, such as pressure and civilization from Western powers. In other words, we experienced a paradigm shift from the Chinese order represented by the “concept of courtesy” to the modern international order based on the “concept of national equality”. On the premise of this point, MaJianZhong's 『東行三錄』 is a vivid record that stood at the very center of the establishment of a new order in East Asia based on the periodic and political background of modern China and Joseon. Therefore, this study attempted to clarify the reorganization of the modern Chinese order, the response of China, the transformation of the perception of Joseon, and the modern transformation of the relationship between Korea and China through a political intent on 『東行三錄』. One of the pillars of 『東行三錄』 is the reorganization of the modern Chinese order and China's response. In the 19th century, China faced the Western powers in earnest through a new way of bargaining between countries, defined as a “treaty system”. And this appears in the form of a challenge to the traditional sovereignty of Chinese countries, in other words, in the form of denial and reorganization of the traditional international order in East Asia. In the process of mediating and signing a treaty between Joseon and Western powers such as the US, Britain, France, and Germany, MaJianZhong focused on obtaining the approval of the Qing's sustenance over Joseon. The traditional relationship between Qing and Joseon was order of courtesy represented by tributary appointment relationship, but the Qing did not directly engage in Joseon's internal affairs and diplomacy. The relationship between the two countries was different from the relationship between the suzerain country and the subordinate country in the exercise of the sovereignty stipulated in international law. In order to overcome this reality, China attempted to change from order of courtesy to a relationship between actual domination and subjugation, and further stipulate the rules of subordination within the treaty between Joseon and Western powers. Through this process, China was able to pursue a transition to a practical immediate release policy. Another pillar of 『東行三錄』 is the transformation of Joseon consciousness and the modern transition process of Korea-China relations. Establishment of treaty relations between Joseon and Western powers meant that the traditional relationship, gyorin was practically ended. MaJianZhong's perception of Joseon is based on this periodic and political process. Therefore, this study analyzes the process recorded in 『東行三錄』 into the recognition of traditional Joseon-China relations, the modernization of Joseon, and the recognition of the Im-O Military Revolt and Lee Haeung. Moreover, the conversion of Korea-China relations was identified. In connection with the modern transformation of the relations between Korea and China, China imposed a new form of “tributary state” system on Joseon. In particular, the political and military external pressure exerted by China after the Im-O Military Revolt was a decisive factor that hindered Joseon's transition to modern society. In addition, this "tributary state" system interfered with both internal and external affairs of Joseon. Moreover, the Qing's rule of thumb followed the Western imperialist state's domination, which is the colonial rule. Considering these points, MaJianZhong's 『東行三錄』 shows the coexistence and confrontation between the tributary appointment relationship and the modern international order amid a common perception of the modern destiny of both Korea and China.
참고문헌 (45)
- 馬建忠, "東行三錄" (1967), 廣文書局
- 馬建忠, "東行三錄" (1982), 上海書店
- 馬建忠, "適可齋紀言紀行" (1967), 文海出版社
- 馬建忠, "適可齋紀言紀行" (1960), 中華書局
- 殷夢霞, "使朝鮮錄" (2003), 北京圖書館出版社
- 張存武, "近代韓中關係論文集" (1987), 臺北商務印書館
- 夏良才, "近代中外關係史硏究槪覽" (1991), 天津敎育出版社
- 王如繪, "近代中日關係與朝鮮問題" (1999), 人民出版社
- 薛玉琴, "近代思想前驅者的悲劇角色: 馬建忠硏究" (2006), 中國社會科學出版社
- 강상규, "19세기 동아시아의 패러다임 변환과 제국 일본" (2007), 논형
- 강상규, "19세기 동아시아의 패러다임 변환과 다중거울" (2012), 논형
- 강진아, "문명제국에서 국민국가로" (2009), 창비
- 구선회, "한국 근대 對淸정책사 연구" (1999), 혜안
- 권혁수, "근대 한중관계사의 재조명" (2007), 혜안
- 김선민, "동아시아의 근대, 그 중심과 주변" (2013), 소명출판
- 김영식, "중국과 조선, 그리고 중화" (2018), 아카넷
- 김정기, "1894년 농민전쟁연구" (1993), 역사비평사
- 김종원, "근세 동아시아관계사연구" (1999), 혜안
- 김한규, "사조선록(使朝鮮錄) 연구: 宋ㆍ明ㆍ淸시대 조선 사행록의 사료적 가치" (2011), 서강대 출판부
- 김한규, "사조선록 역주5 : 淸使의 朝鮮使行錄" (2012), 소명출판
- 김해종, "韓中關係史硏究" (1970), 일조각
- 반재교, "충돌과 착종의 동아시아를 넘어서" (2007), 성균관대 출판부
- 박명희, "근현대 전환기 중화의식의 지속과 변용" (2008), 단국대 출판부
- 백영서, "동아시아의 귀환-중국의 근대성을 묻는다" (2000), 창작과 비평사
- 백영서, "동아시아의 지역질서-제국을 넘어 공동체로" (2005), 창비
- 백영서, "동아시아 근대이행의 세 갈래" (2009), 창비
- 백영서, "내일을 읽는 한ㆍ중관계사" (2019), 알에이치코리아
- 이익주, "동아시아 국제질서 속의 한중관계사" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 신승하, "朝鮮의 門戶開放과 馬建忠의 역할", 아세아연구, 82 (1989)
- 岡本隆司, "馬建忠의 조선 기행-1882년 淸朝, 朝鮮, 日本관계의 전환", 史林, 83 (2000), 동경대사학연구회
- 장원원, "마건충의 균세론과 중국 근대외교", 석사, 사학, pp.2009
- 布琮任, "清季華洋幕僚的合作與互動 -以馬士、馬相伯與馬建忠在李鴻章幕府的關係為例-", 중국사연구, (63), pp.121~135 (2009), 중국사학회
- 장 남, "18-19세기 청 사신의 조선파견과 그 활동: 아극돈(阿克敦)ㆍ화사납(花沙納)ㆍ괴령(魁齡)을 중심으로", pp.2015
- 윤재환, "董越의 「朝鮮賦」를 통해 본 中國 使臣의 朝鮮 認識", 동방한문학, (53), pp.179~212 (2012), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 박종훈, "淸 使臣 阿克敦의 朝鮮 認識 — <奉使圖>와 연관하여 —", 온지논총, (31), pp.149~192 (2012), 온지학회[DOI]
- 김철, "명·청시기 조선 사신들의 대중국 인식 변화 양상에 대한 연구-‘연행록’ 중의 산해관시(詩)을 중심으로", 아시아문화연구, 39, pp.29~68 (2015), 아시아문화연구소[DOI]
- 하정원, "1882년 전후 東아시아論의 形成과 朝鮮 지식인의 反應", 동방한문학, (51), pp.165~198 (2012), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 정해리, "중국 근대 조선 사행록(使行錄) 속조선 인식의 변용과 기억 - 괴령(魁齡)의 『東使紀事詩略』과마건충(馬建忠)의 『東行三錄』을 중심으로", 중국인문과학, (67), pp.357~392 (2017), 중국인문학회[DOI]
- 任靜吾, "馬建忠在『適可齋紀言紀行』裏所表現的思想", 光明日報, (11) (1953)
- 許有成, "馬建忠生平及其思想初探", 復旦學報, (6) (1985)
- 李喜所, "馬建忠與中西文化交流", 中州學報, (4) (1987)
- 譚群玉, "馬建忠的外交思想", 淸史硏究, (4) (1996)
- 石蕾, "馬建忠維新思想硏究", 碩士, pp.2000
- 譚群玉, "馬建忠的外交活動", 中山大學學報論叢, (3) (2000)
- 薛玉琴, "馬建忠對近代西方外交理念的接受與運用", 淮陽師範學院學報, (5) (2003)
