본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 근대 조선 사행록(使行錄) 속조선 인식의 변용과 기억 - 괴령(魁齡)의 『東使紀事詩略』과마건충(馬建忠)의 『東行三錄』을 중심으로

Transformation and Recollection of recognizing Joseon Dynasty through travelogues of the Qing envoys: Focus on 『Dongshijishishilue』 written by KuiLing and 『Dongxingsanlu』 written by MaJianZhong

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In the late 19th century, both Korea and China sought to transform themselves in response to the massive unprecedented flow of the eastern penetration of Western powers. This period was essentially in the historical process of the globalization of the world with the change of the East being westernized. Considering this, it is necessary to study the relationship between Korean and China and to examine  Dongshijishishilue written by KuiLing and Dongxingsanlu written by MaJianZhong to figure out the modernization process of East Asian international relations in the nineteenth century. Based on the above assumption, this study analyzes Dongshijishishilue and  Dongxingsanlu, which are travelogues of the Qing envoys to focus on the transformation and recollection of recognizing Joseon Dynasty. To be specific, in Chapter Ⅱ, it surveys the political and social structure and transformation of modern Chinese-Korean relations in the East Asian international order. In Chapter Ⅲ, it analyzes the perception of the Joseon Dynasty in modern China. In addition, in Chapter Ⅳ, it figures out dismantled the world order system and China's response. The contents of each of these chapters are as follows. First, the political and social structure and the transformation of modern Korean - Chinese relations in the East Asian international order can be summarized as follows. It was emphasizing the traditional Korean-Chinese relationship in Dongshijishishilue KuiLing emphasized not only the relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty, that is, the relationship between the subordinate and the dependent states but also the relationship between tribute and investiture which was the international order centered on China in traditional East Asian. One of the most remarkable aspects of Dongshijishishilue is the Korea-China relationship in the transition and change of international order in the East Asia. Traditionally, international order in the East Asia, centered on China, has continued to be a form of tribute to China by countries around China. However, by changing international order in the East Asia, the traditional relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty was forced to undergo fundamental changes. Therefore, against the Western powers to regard the Joseon Dynasty as an independent nation, China sought to officially acknowledge that the Joseon Dynasty was their dependency. During this process, China actively mediated the treaty between Korea and the Western powers such as the United States and the United Kingdom, and sought to be recognized as a sovereign right to Korea. Further China planned to include the Joseon Dynasty as a province under Chinese territorial control. Second, the modern China's recognition of the Joseon Dynasty can be summarized as follows. KuiLing and MaJianZhong, who were the ambassadors of the Qing dynasty, have a common feature to record the Joseon Dynasty travelogue during the middle and late nineteenth century. However, since their paths, processes and purpose of journey were different, the perceptions of the Joseon Dyasty reflected in various aspects. The perception of the Joseon Dynasty in the Dongxingsanlu are analyzed as follows: (1) The traditional perception of the relationship between China as the parent state and the Josoen Dynasty as the dependent state, (2) The recognition of the Joseon Dynasty 's politics, and (3) The Joseon Dynasty is not only the dependent state but also a strategic hub. KuiLing and MaJianZhong followed the traditionally existing relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty which recognized as the relationship between the parent state and the dependent state. In addition, it emphasized that the Joseon Dynasty inherited the Chinese civilization. This implied the cultural hierarchy relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty from ancient times. KuiLing expressed perception of the Joseon Dynasty' politics as an ideal aspect, whereas MaJianZhong describe it more realistic. Third, the dissolution of the Chinese system in the world order and the response of China can be summarized as follows. With the modernization represented by the eastern penetration of Western powers, the Joseon Dynasty and China underwent a revolutionary change over traditional ideas and values. In addition, in the face of the dismantling of the Chinese system in the world order, China established a modern treaty relationship with the Western powers and other countries, and maintained a traditional relationship with neighboring nations including Korea. Between  Dongshijishishilue and Dongxingsanlu, especially, the latter records the beginning of the process of modernization of the East Asian in traditional international order. The main problem projected in Dongxingsanlu written by MaJianZhong seems to be focused on the arbitration of the Treaty of Commerce between the Joseon Dynasty and the Western Powers, and the settlement of the Im-O Military Revolt. However, in fact, it is perceived that this is the outcome of the process of seeking a response to the world historical events centering on China as well as China's response to international relations strategy. Moreover, the Joseon Dynasty was incorporated into the process of modernization led by the Im-O Military Revolt. Therefore, the political and social response of MaJianZhong was made on a very strategic level, taking into consideration the relations with neighboring countries of East Asia as well as the Western powers. This can be said to be more persuasive considering the fact that since the middle of the nineteenth century, the Chinese empire was shaking and the East Asia was reorganized into a new order based on the nation-state law of the Western powers.

Abstract

In the late 19th century, both Korea and China sought to transform themselves in response to the massive unprecedented flow of the eastern penetration of Western powers. This period was essentially in the historical process of the globalization of the world with the change of the East being westernized. Considering this, it is necessary to study the relationship between Korean and China and to examine  Dongshijishishilue written by KuiLing and Dongxingsanlu written by MaJianZhong to figure out the modernization process of East Asian international relations in the nineteenth century. Based on the above assumption, this study analyzes Dongshijishishilue and  Dongxingsanlu, which are travelogues of the Qing envoys to focus on the transformation and recollection of recognizing Joseon Dynasty. To be specific, in Chapter Ⅱ, it surveys the political and social structure and transformation of modern Chinese-Korean relations in the East Asian international order. In Chapter Ⅲ, it analyzes the perception of the Joseon Dynasty in modern China. In addition, in Chapter Ⅳ, it figures out dismantled the world order system and China's response. The contents of each of these chapters are as follows. First, the political and social structure and the transformation of modern Korean - Chinese relations in the East Asian international order can be summarized as follows. It was emphasizing the traditional Korean-Chinese relationship in Dongshijishishilue KuiLing emphasized not only the relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty, that is, the relationship between the subordinate and the dependent states but also the relationship between tribute and investiture which was the international order centered on China in traditional East Asian. One of the most remarkable aspects of Dongshijishishilue is the Korea-China relationship in the transition and change of international order in the East Asia. Traditionally, international order in the East Asia, centered on China, has continued to be a form of tribute to China by countries around China. However, by changing international order in the East Asia, the traditional relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty was forced to undergo fundamental changes. Therefore, against the Western powers to regard the Joseon Dynasty as an independent nation, China sought to officially acknowledge that the Joseon Dynasty was their dependency. During this process, China actively mediated the treaty between Korea and the Western powers such as the United States and the United Kingdom, and sought to be recognized as a sovereign right to Korea. Further China planned to include the Joseon Dynasty as a province under Chinese territorial control. Second, the modern China's recognition of the Joseon Dynasty can be summarized as follows. KuiLing and MaJianZhong, who were the ambassadors of the Qing dynasty, have a common feature to record the Joseon Dynasty travelogue during the middle and late nineteenth century. However, since their paths, processes and purpose of journey were different, the perceptions of the Joseon Dyasty reflected in various aspects. The perception of the Joseon Dynasty in the Dongxingsanlu are analyzed as follows: (1) The traditional perception of the relationship between China as the parent state and the Josoen Dynasty as the dependent state, (2) The recognition of the Joseon Dynasty 's politics, and (3) The Joseon Dynasty is not only the dependent state but also a strategic hub. KuiLing and MaJianZhong followed the traditionally existing relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty which recognized as the relationship between the parent state and the dependent state. In addition, it emphasized that the Joseon Dynasty inherited the Chinese civilization. This implied the cultural hierarchy relationship between China and the Joseon Dynasty from ancient times. KuiLing expressed perception of the Joseon Dynasty' politics as an ideal aspect, whereas MaJianZhong describe it more realistic. Third, the dissolution of the Chinese system in the world order and the response of China can be summarized as follows. With the modernization represented by the eastern penetration of Western powers, the Joseon Dynasty and China underwent a revolutionary change over traditional ideas and values. In addition, in the face of the dismantling of the Chinese system in the world order, China established a modern treaty relationship with the Western powers and other countries, and maintained a traditional relationship with neighboring nations including Korea. Between  Dongshijishishilue and Dongxingsanlu, especially, the latter records the beginning of the process of modernization of the East Asian in traditional international order. The main problem projected in Dongxingsanlu written by MaJianZhong seems to be focused on the arbitration of the Treaty of Commerce between the Joseon Dynasty and the Western Powers, and the settlement of the Im-O Military Revolt. However, in fact, it is perceived that this is the outcome of the process of seeking a response to the world historical events centering on China as well as China's response to international relations strategy. Moreover, the Joseon Dynasty was incorporated into the process of modernization led by the Im-O Military Revolt. Therefore, the political and social response of MaJianZhong was made on a very strategic level, taking into consideration the relations with neighboring countries of East Asia as well as the Western powers. This can be said to be more persuasive considering the fact that since the middle of the nineteenth century, the Chinese empire was shaking and the East Asia was reorganized into a new order based on the nation-state law of the Western powers.

참고문헌 (71)

  1. 馬建忠, "東行三錄" (1967), 廣文書局
  2. 馬建忠, "東行三錄" (1982), 上海書店
  3. 馬建忠, "適可齋紀言紀行" (1967), 文海出版社
  4. 馬建忠, "適可齋紀言紀行" (1960), 中華書局
  5. 殷夢霞, "使朝鮮錄" (2003), 北京圖書館出版社
  6. 魁齡, "東使紀事詩略" (2010), 上海古籍出版社
  7. 趙爾巽, "淸史稿" (1994), 中華書局
  8. 顧廷龍, "李鴻章全集" (1985), 人民出版社
  9. 夏良才, "近代中外關係史硏究槪覽" (1991), 天津敎育出版社
  10. 王如繪, "近代中日關係與朝鮮問題" (1999), 人民出版社
  11. 李喜所, "中國近代社會與文化硏究" (2003), 人民出版社
  12. 楊立强, "淸末民初資産階級與社會變動" (2003), 上海人民出版社
  13. 楊昭全, "中國-朝鮮ㆍ韓國文化交流史 1-4" (2004), 昆崙出版社
  14. 薛玉琴, "近代思想前驅者的悲劇角色: 馬建忠硏究" (2006), 中國社會科學出版社
  15. 單正平, "晩淸民族主義與文學轉型" (2006), 人民出版社
  16. 김해종, "韓中關係史硏究" (1970), 일조각
  17. 강만길, "한국근대사" (1994), 창작과 비평사
  18. 佐伯有一, "중국현대사" (1980), 한길사
  19. 동북아역사재단, "한중일 학계의 한중관계사 연구와 쟁점" (2009), 동북아역사재단
  20. 최소자, "명청시대 중한관계사 연구" (1997), 이화여대 출판부
  21. 최소자, "淸과 朝鮮-근세 동아시아의 상호인식" (2005), 혜안
  22. 배우성, "조선과 중화" (2014), 돌베개출판사
  23. 박원호, "15-19세기 중국인의 조선인식" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  24. 방향숙, "한중 외교관계와 조공책봉" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  25. 최원식, "동아시아인의 ‘동양’ 인식 : 19-20세기" (1997), 문학과 지성사
  26. 구선회, "한국 근대 對淸정책사 연구" (1999), 혜안
  27. 김종원, "근세 동아시아관계사연구" (1999), 혜안
  28. 백영서, "동아시아의 귀환-중국의 근대성을 묻는다" (2000), 창작과 비평사
  29. 조영록, "근대 동아시아 삼국의 국제교류와 문화" (2002), 지식산업사
  30. 이종민, "근대 중국의 문학적 사유 읽기" (2004), 소명출판
  31. 신승하, "근대중국: 개혁과 혁명(상․하)" (2004), 대명출판사
  32. 권혁수, "근대 한중관계사의 재조명" (2007), 혜안
  33. 백영서, "동아시아의 지역질서-제국을 넘어 공동체로" (2005), 창비
  34. 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원, "동아시아 서사학의 전통과 근대" (2005)
  35. 홍석표, "중국의 근대적 문학의식 탄생" (2007), 북코리아
  36. 반재교, "충돌과 착종의 동아시아를 넘어서" (2007), 성균관대 출판부
  37. 현광호, "한국 근대 사상가의 동아시아 인식" (2009), 선인
  38. 현광호, "서구 열강과 조선" (2011), 채륜
  39. 백영서, "동아시아 근대이행의 세 갈래" (2009), 창비
  40. 김종원, "조선 후기 대외관계 연구" (2009), 한울
  41. 이익주, "동아시아 국제질서 속의 한중관계사 : 제언과 모색" (2010), 동북아역사재단
  42. 강상규, "19세기 동아시아의 패러다임 변화와 다중거울" (2012), 논형
  43. 김한규, "사조선록(使朝鮮錄) 연구: 宋ㆍ明ㆍ淸시대 조선 사행록의 사료적 가치" (2011), 서강대 출판부
  44. 김한규, "사조선록 역주5 : 淸使의 朝鮮使行錄" (2012), 소명출판
  45. 김선민, "동아시아 근대, 그 중심과 주변" (2013), 소명출판
  46. 미야지마 히로시, "동아시아에서 세계를 보면? : 역사의 길목에 선 동아시아 지식인들" (2017), 너머북스
  47. 신승하, "朝鮮의 門戶開放과 馬建忠의 역할", 아세아연구, 82 (1989)
  48. 岡本隆司, "馬建忠의 조선 기행-1882년 淸朝, 朝鮮, 日本관계의 전환", 史林, 83 (2000), 동경대 사학연구회
  49. 장원원, "마건충의 균세론과 중국 근대외교", 석사, 사학, pp.2009
  50. 布琮任, "清季華洋幕僚的合作與互動 -以馬士、馬相伯與馬建忠在李鴻章幕府的關係為例-", 중국사연구, (63), pp.121~135 (2009), 중국사학회
  51. 김경혜, "晩淸早期維新派硏究", pp.1998
  52. 장 남, "18-19세기 청 사신의 조선파견과 그 활동: 아극돈(阿克敦)ㆍ화사납(花沙納)ㆍ괴령(魁齡)을 중심으로", pp.2015
  53. 윤재환, "董越의 「朝鮮賦」를 통해 본 中國 使臣의 朝鮮 認識", 동방한문학, (53), pp.179~212 (2012), 동방한문학회
  54. 윤재환, "董越과 龔用卿의 比較를 통해 본中國 使臣의 朝鮮 認識", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (68), pp.213~255 (2014), 한민족어문학회
  55. 박종훈, "淸 使臣 阿克敦의 朝鮮 認識 — <奉使圖>와 연관하여 —", 온지논총, (31), pp.149~192 (2012), 온지학회
  56. 박종훈, "淸代 文人들의 對朝鮮認識 -阿克敦의 「東游集」과 「奉使圖」의 序跋文을 중심으로-", 동아시아문화연구, (53), pp.147~174 (2013), 동아시아문화연구소
  57. 김철, "명·청시기 조선 사신들의 대중국 인식 변화 양상에 대한 연구-‘연행록’ 중의 산해관시(詩)을 중심으로", 아시아문화연구, 39, pp.29~68 (2015), 아시아문화연구소
  58. 김성남, "1910년대 식민지 조선에 대한 중국의 인식 - 중국인이 쓴 조선 답사기 3종을 중심으로", 사림, (23), pp.61~87 (2005), 수선사학회
  59. 김성은, "조선과 청나라 사신간의 시문교류", 중국학논총, (35), pp.57~73 (2012), 한국중국문화학회
  60. 허 벽, "마건충(馬建忠)과 『마씨문통(馬氏文通)』", 人文科學, 68 (1992)
  61. 진 류, "西學東漸與中韓語法學的建立): 『마씨문통(馬氏文通)』과 『대한문전(大韓文典)』을중심으로", 중국어문학, 36 (2000)
  62. 하정원, "1882년 전후 東아시아論의 形成과 朝鮮 지식인의 反應", 동방한문학, (51), pp.165~198 (2012), 동방한문학회
  63. 張富强, "李鴻章與淸末遣使駐外", 廣東社會科學, 1991(2) (1991)
  64. 任靜吾, "馬建忠在"適可齋紀言紀行"裏所表現的思想", 光明日報, 1953-11기, ~ (1953)
  65. 薛玉琴, "馬建忠對近代西方外交理念的接受與運用", 淮陽師範學院學報, (5) (2003)
  66. 許有成, "馬建忠生平及其思想初探", 復旦學報, (6) (1985)
  67. 譚群玉, "馬建忠的外交思想", 淸史硏究, (4) (1996)
  68. 譚群玉, "馬建忠的外交活動", 中山大學學報論叢, (3) (2000)
  69. 李喜所, "馬建忠與中西文化交流", 中州學報, (4) (1987)
  70. 權赫秀, "馬相伯在朝鮮的顧問活動", 近代史硏究, (3) (2003)
  71. 石蕾, "馬建忠維新思想硏究", 碩士, pp.2000

관련 논문AI추천

근대 중화질서의 재편과 조선 인식의 변용: 마건충(馬建忠)의 『東行三錄』을 중심으로류창진, 정해리중국인문학회 · 중국인문과학2020 · 제76호16-17세기 중국의 대(對) 조선 사행록(使行錄)에 투영된 한‧중 상호인식의 변용과 기억 - 공용경(龔用卿)의 《使朝鮮錄》과 주지번(朱之蕃)의 《奉使朝鮮稿》를 중심으로 -류창진중국인문학회 · 중국인문과학2018 · 제70호9세기 조선사행록(朝鮮使行錄)과 연행록(燕行錄)의 상호 인식 고찰 - 괴령의 『동사기사시략(東使紀事詩略)』과 홍순학의 「병인연행가(丙寅燕行歌)」를 중심으로장정수한국어문교육연구소 · 한국어문교육2020 · 제31호중국 근대 대(對) 조선 서사 기록과 문학적 형상화 연구 - 황준헌(黃遵憲)ㆍ주가록(周家祿)ㆍ장건(張謇)의 중한관계 저작과 시문을 중심으로정해리중국인문학회 · 중국인문과학2016 · 제64호강희 연간 淸使의 사행 기록과 조선 인식의 양상: 揆叙와 阿克敦을 중심으로이명제규장각한국학연구원 · 한국문화2019 · 제88호19세기 동아시아 중화질서의 변동과 한‧중 상호인식의 기억과 변용- 조선(朝鮮) 이유준(李有駿)의 『몽유연행록(夢遊燕行錄)』과 청(淸) 백준(柏葰)의 『봉사조선역정일기(奉使朝鮮驛程日記)』를 중심으로류창진, 정해리중국인문학회 · 중국인문과학2021 · 제79호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)