语言学理论视野下的汉‧韩动词分类体系对比研究综述
A Summary of Contrastive Study between Korean-Chinese Verbs Classification System from the Perspective of Linguistic Theories
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the 21st century, with the broadening of research region and the emergence of new linguistic theories, the classification of Chinese-Korean verbs in academic circle is no longer limited to the perspective of classification under traditional grammar rules. There has been research on the classification of verbs from new perspectives such as light verb theory, typology linguistics, cognitive linguistics, and the research results show that new subcategories such as light verbs, unaccusativeverbs and unergative verbs, absolutive verbs and ergative verbs have been applied. The Chinese-Korean internal structure of the verb systems have changed as well, showing the trend that the subcategories become more differentiated, but the internal structure is more concise and has stronger explanatory power. After comparing the new and the old classification systems of Chinese-Korean verbs and summarizing the classification and subcategories of verbs in Chinese and Korean, it can be seen that the Chinese-Korean linguistic circle attach great importance to the application of new theories when studying the subcategories of verbs; but the Chinese academic circle seem to be one step ahead in the application of the new theory to constructing the macroscopic study of verb system; and the research o
Abstract
Since the 21st century, with the broadening of research region and the emergence of new linguistic theories, the classification of Chinese-Korean verbs in academic circle is no longer limited to the perspective of classification under traditional grammar rules. There has been research on the classification of verbs from new perspectives such as light verb theory, typology linguistics, cognitive linguistics, and the research results show that new subcategories such as light verbs, unaccusativeverbs and unergative verbs, absolutive verbs and ergative verbs have been applied. The Chinese-Korean internal structure of the verb systems have changed as well, showing the trend that the subcategories become more differentiated, but the internal structure is more concise and has stronger explanatory power. After comparing the new and the old classification systems of Chinese-Korean verbs and summarizing the classification and subcategories of verbs in Chinese and Korean, it can be seen that the Chinese-Korean linguistic circle attach great importance to the application of new theories when studying the subcategories of verbs; but the Chinese academic circle seem to be one step ahead in the application of the new theory to constructing the macroscopic study of verb system; and the research o
참고문헌 (51)
- 강범모, "서술명사의 기준과 의미 구조", 한국언어정보학회 여름학술 대회 발표논문집, pp.77~83 (2000)
- 高光柱, "국어의 비대격 구문 연구 : 비대격 술어의 논항구조와 통사적 양상", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1995
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2001
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성연구" (2001), 월인
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2018), 집문당
- 김일웅, "풀이말의 결합가와 격", 한글, 186, pp.35~72 (1984)
- 김철준, "조선어문법론" (2009), 연변대학출판사
- 목정수, "‘이다’를 機能動詞로 分析해야 하는 이유 몇 가지", 어문연구(語文硏究), 35(4), pp.7~28 (2007), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 박덕유, "국어의 동사상 연구" (1998), 제이앤
- 이석주, "한국어학 개론" (2007), 보고사
- 이병규, "국어 명사의 논항구조 연구" (2009), 월인
- 이선웅, "술어명사구와 동사구의 동질성과 이질성", 우리말글, 38, pp.107~133 (2006), 우리말글학회
- 이영제, "기능동사 개념의 의의와 기능요소적 특성에 의한 단어 분류", 國語學, (84), pp.155~184 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이영제, "어휘기능범주 이론에 관하여", 한국언어문화 교육학회 제18차 추계 전국학술대회, pp.175~184 (2013)
- 홍재성, "이동동사와 기능동사", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 22, pp.121~140 (1998)
- 홍재성, "기능동사 구문 연구의 한 시각: 어휘적 접근", 인문논총, 41, pp.135~173 (1999)
- 원지숙, "서술어의 결합가를 중심으로 한 한국어 문형분류", 어문논집, 32, pp.495~517 (1993)
- 한송화, "현대 국어 자동사 연구" (2000), 한국문화사
- 금잔디, "한국어교육에서의 기능동사 교육 내용 설정 연구", 석사, pp.2016
- 김창섭, "경동사 '하다'의 두 가지 보어", 관악어문연구, 27, pp.149~186 (2002)
- 김양진, "부정의 기능동사 '않-", 안하-', '못하-'의 설정에 대하여, 2007, pp.35, 195~217[DOI]
- 이영제, "어휘기능범주 이론에 관하여", 한국언어문화교육 학회전국학술대회 발표논문집, pp.175~184 (2013)
- 昌雅洁, "近十年来轻动词理论下的汉语研究综述", 现代语文, 05, pp.13~16 (2017)
- 陈昌来, "现代汉语动词的句法语义属性研究" (2002), 学林出版社
- 金奉民, "汉韩动词配价对比" (2014), 延边大学出版社
- 金立鑫, "语言类型学探索" (2017), 商务印书馆
- 邓杰, "韩国语作格动词研究", 博士, pp.2017
- 范晓, "汉语动词概述" (1987), 上海教育出版社
- 冯胜利, "轻动词移位与古今汉语的动宾关系", 语言科学, 4(01), pp.3~16 (2005)
- 黄正德, "汉语动词的题元结构与其句法表现", 语言科学, 6(04), pp.3~21 (2007)
- 黄正德, "从“他的老师当得好”谈起", 语言科学, 3, pp.225~251 (2008)
- 黎锦熙, "新著国语文法" (1992), 商务印书馆
- 刘亮, "现代汉语轻动词体系研究", 博士, pp.2015
- 马庆株, "汉语动词和动词性结构" (1992), 北京语言学院出版社
- 朴彩夽, "汉韩对比视角下的汉语动词分类及其教学研究", 碩士, pp.2019
- 瞿云华, "句法语义基本对应的英汉动词分类体系研究", 外语学刊, 2, pp.37~44 (2016)
- 吴仑真, "韩汉语法对比研究之研究", 碩士, pp.2013
- 许宗华, "面向学习者和汉日对比的动词分类", 日本学研究, 7, pp.92~98 (2015)
- 袁毓林, "汉语配价语法研究" (2010), 商务印书馆
- 张明辉, "21世纪汉语动词分类标准问题研究综述", 辽东学院学报, 19(06), pp.103~111 (2017)
- 张松松, "汉语动词分类的认知研究", 扬州大学学报, 21(01), pp.121~128 (2017)
- 张小敏, "基于轻动词理论的英汉使役结构研究", 语言应用研, 4, pp.143~146 (2015)
- 赵元任, "汉语口语语法" (1979), 商务印书馆
- 邹文洁, "现代汉语动词的方向分类及解释", 碩士, pp.2009
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Light Verbs and θ-Marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
- Gross, Maurice, "Méthodes en syntaxe" (1975), Hermann
- Harris, Zellig S., "The Elementary Transformations", Reprinted in Harris, 1964, pp.482~532 (1970)
- Huang, C.-T. James, "On Lexical Structure and Syntactic Projection", Chinese Languages and Linguistics, pp.45~89 (1997)
- Jespersen, Otto, "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles(Part VI, Morphology)" (1942), George Allen&Unwin
- Lin, Tzong-Hong, "Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure", Doctor, pp.2001