温度感觉词“热”与“뜨겁다”的语义对比研究
A Comparative Study of Semantic Meanings of Chinese Temperature Sensation Word "Re" and Korean "tteugeopda"
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Tactile sense is the earliest and the most basic human sense. It is also the most widely distributed, most complex senses, and bases of other higher level senses. As an important member of the tactile sense, the concept of temperature is very rich, and its meaning can be projected from the temperature domain onto the more complex domain of environment and attention by the mechanism of metaphor and metonymy. Using cognitve linguistic method and taking semantic domain as the basic compatative unit, the present study conducted a systematic comparison of two temperature sensation word, Chinese "Re" and Korean "tteugeopda", in terms of thier basic and extended meanings. The result show that there are 11 domains for "Re" and 8 domains for "tteugeopda". The temperature domain, degree domain, attention domain, spleen domain, relationship domain, environmental domain, and circumstance domain are shared by the two words. The processing domain, disease domain, attitude domain and vision domain is exclusively owned by "Re" while sexuality domain is owned only by "tteugeopda ". The analysis of the semantic distribution of the temperature sense words "hot" and "tteugeopda" in terms of their commonality and individuality can not only help us understand the expressional characteristics of Chinese and Korean language more clearly, but also help us to explore the cognitive mechanism behind language facts.
Abstract
Tactile sense is the earliest and the most basic human sense. It is also the most widely distributed, most complex senses, and bases of other higher level senses. As an important member of the tactile sense, the concept of temperature is very rich, and its meaning can be projected from the temperature domain onto the more complex domain of environment and attention by the mechanism of metaphor and metonymy. Using cognitve linguistic method and taking semantic domain as the basic compatative unit, the present study conducted a systematic comparison of two temperature sensation word, Chinese "Re" and Korean "tteugeopda", in terms of thier basic and extended meanings. The result show that there are 11 domains for "Re" and 8 domains for "tteugeopda". The temperature domain, degree domain, attention domain, spleen domain, relationship domain, environmental domain, and circumstance domain are shared by the two words. The processing domain, disease domain, attitude domain and vision domain is exclusively owned by "Re" while sexuality domain is owned only by "tteugeopda ". The analysis of the semantic distribution of the temperature sense words "hot" and "tteugeopda" in terms of their commonality and individuality can not only help us understand the expressional characteristics of Chinese and Korean language more clearly, but also help us to explore the cognitive mechanism behind language facts.
참고문헌 (38)
- "SJ-RIKS Corpus", ~
- "北京大学中国语言学研究中心语料库", ~
- 김미형, "인지적 대조언어학의 방법론 연구" (2009), 한국문화사
- 김향숙, "한국어 감정표현 관용어 연구" (2002), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "국어의미론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "말하는 몸 : 감정 표현의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2006), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 蒋绍愚, "纪念王力先生九十诞辰文集" (1991), 山东教育出版社
- 李福印, "语义学概论" (2006), 北京大学出版社
- 吕叔湘, "通过对比研宄语法" (1992), 语言教学与研究
- 束定芳, "隐喻和转喻研究" (2011), 上海外语教育出版社
- Kövecses, Z., "언어․마음․문화의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2010), 역락
- Kövecses, Z, "Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, G., "삶으로서의 은유" (2006), 박이정
- Langecker, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I, Theoretical Prerequisites" (1987), The University of Stanford Press
- Ungerer, F., "인지언어학개론" (2010), 태학사
- 강병창, "‘따뜻함’과 ‘뜨거움’의 온감 연어에 나타나는 비유적 의미 확장― 한국어, 영어, 독일어의 비교", 국제어문, (55), pp.151~181 (2012), 국제어문학회
- 강보유, "인지언어학과 한국어 교육", 한국(조선)어교육연구, (9), pp.87~115 (2013), 중국한국(조선)어교육연구학회
- 김기석, "중한 언어 대조 연구에서의 협의적 대조와 광의적 대조", 한국어문학국제학술포럼, 19, pp.39~59 (2012)
- 김준기, "온도어의 의미 고찰", 어문학, 78, pp.21~45 (2002), 한국어문학회
- 양태식, "우리말 온도 어휘소 무리의 의미 구조", 한글, 201.202, pp.119~196 (1988), 한글학회
- 이선희, "한국어 ‘개’와 중국어 ‘狗’의 의미 확장 소고", 한중인문학연구, (57), pp.171~190 (2017), 한중인문학회
- 이영경, "국어 온도 표현 어휘의 발달에 대하여", 한국문화, (57), pp.249~275 (2012), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 이유미, "한국어 은유의 근원영역 특징- ‘불’, ‘물’, ‘온도’를 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 20, pp.187~203 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- 석수영, "한중 온감어의 감정 전이에 대한 인지언어학적 분석", 국어교육연구, (55), pp.181~210 (2014), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- 석수영, "신체화에 기초한 한중 감각어의 의미 확장 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 정수진, "국어 감각명사의 의미 확장에 대한 인지언어학적 접근 국어 감각명사의 의미 확장에 대한 인지언어학적 접근", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (60), pp.271~290 (2012), 한민족어문학회[DOI]
- 정재윤, "국어 온도 감각 동사의 어휘 체계", 국어교육, 75, pp.15~28 (1991), 한국국어교육연구회
- 천시권, "온도 어휘의 상관 체계", 국어교육연구, 12(1), pp.1~14 (1980), 국어교육학회
- 曹璘琳, "中韩温度概念隐喻的对比研究", 硕士, pp.2013
- 陈建祥, "汉语温度域词语“冷”和“热”的概念隐喻研究", 长沙大学学报, 26(1), pp.95~97 (2012)
- 高航, "汉语温度图式所衍生的概念隐喻", 四川外语学院学报, 24(2), pp.7~12 (2008)
- 郭一诚, "中韩感觉形容词的形态及语义结构研究", 博士, pp.2012
- 李国南, "论“通感”的人类生理学共性", 上海外国语大学学报 (1996)
- 李丽虹, "汉英温觉词语义对比研究", 博士, pp.2012
- 朴恩珍, "한·중 온도감각형용사 대응 연구", 硕士, pp.2011
- 任晓艳, "现代汉语温觉感觉词研究", 硕士, pp.2006