본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 중국 미술 개념과 문학의 조우 및 소통 시탐(試探) - 미술의 공리적 가치 부여에서 문예의 독립적 지위 획득까지-

A study on Exploring Encounter and Communication of the Concept of Art and Literature in Modern China - From Assigning Utilitarian Value of Art To Acquiring Independent Statue of Art and Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study aims to shed light on the concept and value perception of modern Chinese art, and to re-examine it from the overall perspective of literary theory. Specifically, this study is based on trends and perceptions of modern art concepts in East Asia, encounters in contemporary Chinese art and literature, and communication between modern Chinese art concepts and essentialism of literature: The process was divided into three parts, from the utilitarian value of art to the acquisition of independent status in literature. First, the trends and perceptions of East Asian modern art concepts were examined. In the case of Japan, it can be seen that utilitarian values are perceived to promote national policy in the trend of modernization. In terms of China, Kang Youwei(康有爲) insisted that "the social function of art and artists should be emphasized, and national education and nationality reconstruction should be carried out together." Cai Yuanpei(蔡元培) emphasized the universality and transcendence of beauty. Since the 1900's, it has been discussed in Liang Qichao(梁啓超), Wang Guowei(王國維) and Lu Xun(魯迅). The fact that the concept of beauty or art mentioned in Chinese modern literary literature is connected with Western and Japanese modern times serves as a clue to the formation of Chinese modern literary discourse. Therefore, as a first step of the study, this study examined the concept of Japanese art, the accepting aspect of China, and the trend of modern Chinese art. Second, the encounter between modern Chinese art and literature was examined. If the use of the term art mentioned in literary literature is largely focused on utilitarian aspects, Wang Guowei disagrees with the discussions of the time. He considered "fiction belongs to the category of art," and he considered "the best of Chinese poems, plays, and novels." Huang Ren(黃人) also said that "fiction is one of the aesthetically oriented literatures," which is the beginning of the encounter between beauty and literature. Zhou Zuoren(周作人) also recognized that the novel was clearly a sentence and a work of art. Guan Daru(管達如) and Lu Simian(呂思勉) then systematically organized the theory of the novel in general. In particular, Guan Daru attempts to position each of literature, art and fiction on the premise that "literature is a kind of art, fiction is also a kind of literature."In short, as art begins to be discussed with literature, journalists link "beauty and literature" and "beauty and novels." And with the understanding of literature in general, the position between art, literature and fiction becomes clearer. Third, this study examined the process from granting utilitarian value of art to acquiring independent status of literature, focusing on communication between modern Chinese art concept and literary essentialism. Xia Ren(俠人) talks about the ratio of fiction between fiction and history, emphasizing the creation of fictional realms and focusing on the essential characteristics of fiction. In other words, the literary value of the novel is highlighted. In addition, he pays attention to the utility values and literary characteristics of novels and moves his eyes to the aesthetic values of novels. Huang Ren paid attention to the useful value of the novel based on an aesthetic angle. Wang Guowei, on the other hand, strongly argues that if philosophy and art are the means of morality and politics, then the work is ultimately worthless. This claim completely overcomes the view of traditional Chinese literature and emphasizes the true independence of literature. Lu Simian systematized theories of novel creation based on the recognition that novels are artistic creations. In particular, the point of meaningfully discussing the fictional novels by dividing the novels is that they also pay attention to the value of literature itself.

Abstract

This study aims to shed light on the concept and value perception of modern Chinese art, and to re-examine it from the overall perspective of literary theory. Specifically, this study is based on trends and perceptions of modern art concepts in East Asia, encounters in contemporary Chinese art and literature, and communication between modern Chinese art concepts and essentialism of literature: The process was divided into three parts, from the utilitarian value of art to the acquisition of independent status in literature. First, the trends and perceptions of East Asian modern art concepts were examined. In the case of Japan, it can be seen that utilitarian values are perceived to promote national policy in the trend of modernization. In terms of China, Kang Youwei(康有爲) insisted that "the social function of art and artists should be emphasized, and national education and nationality reconstruction should be carried out together." Cai Yuanpei(蔡元培) emphasized the universality and transcendence of beauty. Since the 1900's, it has been discussed in Liang Qichao(梁啓超), Wang Guowei(王國維) and Lu Xun(魯迅). The fact that the concept of beauty or art mentioned in Chinese modern literary literature is connected with Western and Japanese modern times serves as a clue to the formation of Chinese modern literary discourse. Therefore, as a first step of the study, this study examined the concept of Japanese art, the accepting aspect of China, and the trend of modern Chinese art. Second, the encounter between modern Chinese art and literature was examined. If the use of the term art mentioned in literary literature is largely focused on utilitarian aspects, Wang Guowei disagrees with the discussions of the time. He considered "fiction belongs to the category of art," and he considered "the best of Chinese poems, plays, and novels." Huang Ren(黃人) also said that "fiction is one of the aesthetically oriented literatures," which is the beginning of the encounter between beauty and literature. Zhou Zuoren(周作人) also recognized that the novel was clearly a sentence and a work of art. Guan Daru(管達如) and Lu Simian(呂思勉) then systematically organized the theory of the novel in general. In particular, Guan Daru attempts to position each of literature, art and fiction on the premise that "literature is a kind of art, fiction is also a kind of literature."In short, as art begins to be discussed with literature, journalists link "beauty and literature" and "beauty and novels." And with the understanding of literature in general, the position between art, literature and fiction becomes clearer. Third, this study examined the process from granting utilitarian value of art to acquiring independent status of literature, focusing on communication between modern Chinese art concept and literary essentialism. Xia Ren(俠人) talks about the ratio of fiction between fiction and history, emphasizing the creation of fictional realms and focusing on the essential characteristics of fiction. In other words, the literary value of the novel is highlighted. In addition, he pays attention to the utility values and literary characteristics of novels and moves his eyes to the aesthetic values of novels. Huang Ren paid attention to the useful value of the novel based on an aesthetic angle. Wang Guowei, on the other hand, strongly argues that if philosophy and art are the means of morality and politics, then the work is ultimately worthless. This claim completely overcomes the view of traditional Chinese literature and emphasizes the true independence of literature. Lu Simian systematized theories of novel creation based on the recognition that novels are artistic creations. In particular, the point of meaningfully discussing the fictional novels by dividing the novels is that they also pay attention to the value of literature itself.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. 陳平原, "二十世紀中國小說理論資料" (1989), 北京大學出版社
  2. 徐中玉, "中國近代文學大系" (1994), 上海書店
  3. 王云熙, "中國文論選 近代卷(下)" (1996), 江蘇文藝出版社
  4. 黃霖, "中國歷代小說論著選, 下編" (2000), 江西人民出版社
  5. 高平叔, "蔡元培全集 1-2卷" (1984), 中華書局
  6. 夏曉虹, "梁啓超文選 (上ㆍ下)" (1992), 中國廣播電視出版社
  7. 魯迅, "魯迅全集" (1996), 人民文學出版社
  8. 姚淦銘, "王國維文集 (1-4卷)" (1997), 中國文史出版社
  9. 佐久間象山, "省諐錄" (1871), 聚遠樓
  10. 大日本百科辭典編輯部, "工業大辭典" (1913), 同文館
  11. 柳田泉, "明治初期の文學思想 (下)" (1965), 春秋社
  12. 飯田賢一, "科學と技術" (1989), 岩波書店
  13. 李筱圃, "日本記游", 岳鹿書社
  14. 王曉平, "近代中日文學交流史稿" (1987), 湖南文藝出版社
  15. 方正耀, "中國小說批評史略" (1990), 中國社會科學出版社
  16. 盧善慶, "中國近代美學思想史" (1991), 華東師範大學出版社
  17. 陳偉, "中國現代美學思想史" (1992), 上海師範大學出版社
  18. 黃錦珠, "晩淸時期小說觀念之轉變" (1995), 文史哲出版社
  19. 葉嘉寶, "王國維及其文學批評" (1997), 河北敎育出版社
  20. 王德威, "晩淸小說新論-被抑壓的現代性" (2003), 麥田出版
  21. 夏中義, "王國維 : 世紀苦魂" (2006), 北京大學出版社
  22. 張福貴, "中日近現代文學大系比較硏究" (1999), 吉林大學出版社
  23. 饒汎子, "中日比較文學硏究資料徽編" (2002), 中國美術學院出版社
  24. 龔民, "黃人及其小說小話之硏究" (2006), 齊魯書社
  25. 于民, "中國美學思想史" (2010), 復旦大學出版社
  26. 陳平原, "중국소설서사학" (1994), 살림
  27. 康有爲, "대동서" (2006), 을유문화사
  28. 胡國樞, "차이위안페이평전" (2009), 김영사
  29. 게오르그 Wㆍ프리드리히 헤겔, "헤겔 미학 1" (1996), 나남출판
  30. 가라타니 고진, "일본 근대문학의 기원" (1997), 민음사
  31. 김채수, "일본의 프론티어는 일본 안에 있다" (2001), 보고사
  32. 이보경, "문文과 노벨novel의 결혼: 근대 중국의 소설이론 재편" (2002), 문학과지성사
  33. 정병호, "실용주의 문화사조와 일본 근대문예론의 탄생" (2003), 보고사
  34. 이종민, "근대 중국의 문학적 사유 읽기" (2004), 소명출판
  35. 류창교, "왕국유평전: 왕국유의 삶과 학문을 통해 본 중국근대지성사" (2005), 영남대출판부
  36. 김윤수, "한국미술 100년, 1" (2006), 한길사
  37. 박계리, "동아시아 미술의 근대와 근대성" (2009), 학고재
  38. 土方定一, "일본の근대미술" (2010), 巖波書店
  39. 안현정, "근대의 시선, 조선미술전람회" (2012), 이학사
  40. 장치췬, "중국현대미학사" (2013), 성균관대학교 출판부
  41. 점필재연구소 고전번역학센터, "동아시아, 근대를 번역하다" (2013), 점필재
  42. 이상우, "중국미학의 근대" (2014), 아카넷
  43. 동의대학교 동아시아연구소, "근대번역과 동아시아" (2015), 박문사
  44. 김미영, "근대 한국문학과 미술의 상호작용" (2014), 소명출판
  45. 강용훈, "동아시아 예술담론의 계보" (2016), 너머북스
  46. 王群, "論中國近代文學理論批評的自覺性", 江彙論壇, (5) (1996)
  47. 趙利民, "論中國近代文學觀念的新舊雜糅特徵", 山東大學學報, (2) (1999)
  48. 姜文振, "王國維對文藝美學現代性建構的貢獻", 河北師範大學學報 (2002)
  49. 柳昌嬌, "王國維 文藝批評 硏究", 박사, 문학, pp.1996
  50. 沈亨哲, "近代轉換期 中國의 小說論 硏究", 박사, 문학, pp.1997
  51. 이종민, "근대중국의 시대인식과 문학적 사유", 박사, 중문학, pp.1998
  52. 이보경, "20세기초 중국의 소설이론 재편 연구", 박사, 중어중문, pp.2000
  53. 기타자와 노리아키, "‘미술’ 개념의 형성과 리얼리즘의 轉位: 메이지ㆍ다이쇼期의 ‘미술’ 인식에 대하여", 美術史論壇, (2) (1995)
  54. 袁寶林, "근대 동아시아의 미술인식", 美術史論壇, (2) (1995)
  55. 정병호, "일본 근대문학에서의 문학장르 의식의 탄생과 그 주변: ‘美文學’ 이라는 개념의 탄생과 ‘美辭學’", 일본문화연구, 4 (2001)
  56. 김용철, "근대 중국의 ‘美術’ 개념과 1929년 전국미술전람회", 개념과 소통, (9), pp.183~208 (2012), 한림과학원[DOI]
  57. 김백균, "중국 근대 미술교육 제도와 국가 정체성", 미술교육연구논총, 31(0), pp.381~395 (2012), 한국초등미술교육학회[DOI]
  58. 홍서연, "왕국유 예술교육론의 주요논점 고찰", 중국문화연구, (31), pp.119~145 (2016), 중국문화연구학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)