본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한승원과 한사오궁(韩少功)소설의 신화적 사유와 무(巫) 재생 양상 비교 연구

A Comparative Study of Mythical Reasoning and Shamanic Resurgence in the Novels of Han SeungWon and Han Shaogong

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study explores the archetypes and roots of the nation through the comparative literature research method, focusing on the novels of Han SeungWon and Han ShaoGong, and compares and analyzes how a critical consciousness of modern civilization is concretely manifested. Both Han SeungWon and Han ShaoGong carry the issues of “tradition and modernity,” “tradition and national subjectivity,” and attempt to observe national culture anew and seek a balance between modernity and tradition. Both authors, based on the reality of the spread of modern rational thought and the revival of national tradition, regenerate mythic thinking and recognize the modern value of shamanism as a common point of national spirit and roots. The difference lies in that Han SeungWon evokes a healthy vitality originating from national myths, while Han ShaoGong evokes a morbid vitality. Furthermore, Han SeungWon internalizes the value of shamanism as a national spiritual value by setting the elements within shamanism as a device of localism. On the other hand, Han ShaoGong attempts to enter the shamanic space to find and regress to the roots of the nation, but ultimately fails to find spiritual solace in the shamanic space created by himself, and instead observes with a detached and cold perspective. Through this study, it is expected to provide new interpretations and research directions for East Asian literary studies, to achieve a deep understanding of Eastern thinking methods, mysterious culture, and the spirit of shamanism, and it also has significance in exploring the shared experiences of Eastern countries in the process of embracing modern civilization and scientific technology.

Abstract

This study explores the archetypes and roots of the nation through the comparative literature research method, focusing on the novels of Han SeungWon and Han ShaoGong, and compares and analyzes how a critical consciousness of modern civilization is concretely manifested. Both Han SeungWon and Han ShaoGong carry the issues of “tradition and modernity,” “tradition and national subjectivity,” and attempt to observe national culture anew and seek a balance between modernity and tradition. Both authors, based on the reality of the spread of modern rational thought and the revival of national tradition, regenerate mythic thinking and recognize the modern value of shamanism as a common point of national spirit and roots. The difference lies in that Han SeungWon evokes a healthy vitality originating from national myths, while Han ShaoGong evokes a morbid vitality. Furthermore, Han SeungWon internalizes the value of shamanism as a national spiritual value by setting the elements within shamanism as a device of localism. On the other hand, Han ShaoGong attempts to enter the shamanic space to find and regress to the roots of the nation, but ultimately fails to find spiritual solace in the shamanic space created by himself, and instead observes with a detached and cold perspective. Through this study, it is expected to provide new interpretations and research directions for East Asian literary studies, to achieve a deep understanding of Eastern thinking methods, mysterious culture, and the spirit of shamanism, and it also has significance in exploring the shared experiences of Eastern countries in the process of embracing modern civilization and scientific technology.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 김주현, "김동리의 그늘과 미학화된 ‘역사의식’", 어문논집, 42, pp.306~ (2009), 중앙어문학회
  2. 전도미, "서사전략으로서의 은유-한승원 중편소설 『폐촌(废村)의 사례』", 현대문학이론연구, (67), pp.256~ (2016), 현대문학이론학회
  3. 백지영, "한국 소설에 나타난 무속 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2009
  4. 윤효선, "한국 현대소설의 '무' 수용 양상 연구", 박사, 현대문학, pp.2006
  5. 김경희, "소설이 신화를 차용하는 방식", pp.63~ (2017), 국학자료원
  6. 김주연, "한승원 삶과 문학", pp.87~94 (2000), 문이당
  7. 김형중, "야만과 신화", pp.561~ (2016), 예담
  8. 박성창, "비교문학의 도전", pp.115~118 (2009), 믿음사
  9. 이태동, "한승원 삶과 문학", pp.195~ (2000), 문이당
  10. 왕샹위안 저, "비교문학의 열쇠" (2002), 한국학술정보
  11. 유동식, "한국 무교의 역사와 구조", pp.64~ (1997), 연세대학교 출판부
  12. 조셉 켐벨 저, "세계의 영웅신화", pp.371~ (1991), 대원사
  13. 전성욱, "앞산도 첩첩하고", pp.335~ (2007), 책세상
  14. 하응백, "한승원 중단편전집1", pp.410~ (1999), 문이당
  15. 한사오궁 저, "열렬한 책읽기", pp.31~ (2008), 청어람미디어
  16. 한사오궁 저, "귀거래" (2014), 창비
  17. 한승원, "열한권의 창작노트: 중견작가들이 말하는 ‘나의 소설쓰기", pp.203~ (1991), 창
  18. 한승원, "불의 딸" (1996), 문학과지성사
  19. 한승원, "앞산도 첩첩하고" (2007), 책새상
  20. 한승원, "한승원의 소설쓰는 법", pp.197~ (2009), 랜덤하우스코리아
  21. 陈仲耿, "合一人神 : 楚文化思维模式与韩少功之演绎", 福建论坛, (2) (2002)
  22. 曾利君, "巫文化与中国新时期小说", 西南大学学报, (3), pp.116~123 (2012)
  23. 龚敏律, "韩少功的寻根小说与巫楚文化", 中国文学研究, (2), pp.6~ (2005)
  24. 洪子诚, "丙崽生长记-韩少功≪爸爸爸≫的阅读和修改", 中国现代文学研究丛刊, (12), pp.2~ (2012)
  25. 孔令俐, "<爸爸爸>中丙崽与刑天的形象意义解读", 文学研究, (6), pp.52~53 (2013)
  26. 李庆西, "他在寻找什么-关于韩少功的论文提纲"", 小说评论, (1), pp.45~ (1987)
  27. 李洁非, "评中国文学的民族意识", 上海文学, (1), pp.75~ (1989)
  28. 李遇春, "“进步”与“进步的回退”-韩少功小说创作流变论", 文学评论, (5), pp.46~47 (2014)
  29. 刘小平, "“道”的隐遁与显现-重读≪爸爸爸≫和≪树王≫", 阜阳师范学院学报, (1), pp.19~ (2005)
  30. 南帆, "论当代小说中的“傻瓜”形象", 中国现代文学研究丛刊, (8), pp.93~ (2014)
  31. 谭桂林, "楚巫文化与20世纪湖南文学", 理论与创作, (2), pp.21~ (2000)
  32. 廖述务主编, "韩少功研究资料" (2008), 天津人民出版社
  33. 王志, "屈原与巫文化关系研究", 博士, pp.2006
  34. 王振复, "巫术-<周易>的文化智慧", pp.234~235 (1990), 浙江古籍出版社
  35. 吴义勤主编, "韩少功研究资料" (2006), 山东文艺出版社
  36. 易瑛, "巫风浸润下的诗意想象-巫文化与中国现当代小说" (2013), 湖南师范大学出版社
  37. 藤野岩友著, "巫系文学论", pp.4~5 (2005), 重庆出版社

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)