A Discourse Approach to Korean Request Strategies: Korean Honorific Forms and Cultural Values
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Many cross-linguistic studies have argued there is a correlation between politeness and indirectness, although the results herein do not necessarily confirm this relationship. Linguistic forms alone cannot explain the conceptualization of (im) politeness given its conscious, meta-pragmatic and ideological nature. This study investigates the role of the Confucian values (Confucian scripts) that influences the way linguistic interaction is understood. Naturally occurring data derived from institutional discourse contexts were used and analyzed qualitatively by integrating both the Confucian framework and a spoken discourse approach. Findings herein highlight three important aspects of Korean honorific use in relation to linguistic politeness. First, along with the level of indirectness, Koreans reference both individual frameworks and cultural scripts in the negotiation of requests. Second, common cultural values function as another R variable since culturally shared knowledge (‘Confucian scripts’) is anchored on the individual frame, which directly controls power and distance variables
Abstract
Many cross-linguistic studies have argued there is a correlation between politeness and indirectness, although the results herein do not necessarily confirm this relationship. Linguistic forms alone cannot explain the conceptualization of (im) politeness given its conscious, meta-pragmatic and ideological nature. This study investigates the role of the Confucian values (Confucian scripts) that influences the way linguistic interaction is understood. Naturally occurring data derived from institutional discourse contexts were used and analyzed qualitatively by integrating both the Confucian framework and a spoken discourse approach. Findings herein highlight three important aspects of Korean honorific use in relation to linguistic politeness. First, along with the level of indirectness, Koreans reference both individual frameworks and cultural scripts in the negotiation of requests. Second, common cultural values function as another R variable since culturally shared knowledge (‘Confucian scripts’) is anchored on the individual frame, which directly controls power and distance variables
참고문헌 (34)
- 김용성, "한국의 유교 문화와 한국어", 교육 논총, 21, pp.87~101 (2001), 전북대학교 교육대학원
- 이승희, "국어청자 높임법의 역사적 변화, In 국어학 총서" (2007), 태학사
- Bargiela, C. F, "Face, Communication and Social Interaction" (2009), Equinox Publishing Ltd
- Bargiela-C, F, "Politeness across Cultures" (2010), Palgrave Macmillan
- Blum-Kulka, S, "Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different", Journal of Pragmatics, 11, pp.145~160 (1987)
- Brown, L, "Politeness and Korean Honorifics, In Politeness across Cultures" (2010), Palgrave Macmillan
- Brown, P, "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Byon, A, "The Role of Linguistic Indirectness and Honorifics in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean Requests", Journal of Politeness Research, 2, pp.247~276 (2006)
- Cameron, D, "Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method" (1992), Routledge
- Fukada, A, "Universal Politeness Theory: Application to the Use of Japanese Honorifics", Journal of Pragmatics, 36(11), pp.1991~2002 (2004)
- Fukushima, S, "Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese" (2000), Peter Lang
- Harris, S, "Politeness and Power: Making and Responding to ‘Requests’ in Institutional Settings", Text, 23(1), pp.27~52 (2003)
- Haugh, M, "Face and Interaction, In Face, Communication and Social Interaction", pp.1~30 (2009), Equinox
- Heritage, J, "Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analysing Data, In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice", pp.222~246 (1997), Sage Publications
- Holmes, J, "Power and Politeness in the Workplace" (2003), Pearson Education Ltd
- Hong, J-O, "A Discourse Approach to Korean Politeness: Towards a Culture- specific Confucian Framework", 박사, pp.2009
- Hutchby, I, "Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications" (1998), polity Press Black Publishers Ltd
- Ide, S, "Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Linguistic Politeness", Multilingua, 8(2), pp.223~248 (1989)
- Kang, A, "Talk, Interaction and Cultural Persistence: Constituting Korean American Discourse in a Meeting Context", 박사, pp.2000
- Lee, J. B, "On the Strategic Usage of Korean Honorifics", Language Study, 35(1) (1999), National University Language Research Center
- Lee, J. B, "The Strategic Features of Korean Honorific Usages" (2001), Tae Hak Publishing Co
- Lee, K-K, "A Study of the Conceptual System of Politeness Treatment", Sociolinguistics, 5(2), pp.645~669 (1997)
- Leech, G, "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Locher, M. A, "Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication" (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
- Matsumoto, Y, "Re-examination of the Universality of Face: Politeness in Japanese", Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), pp.403~426 (1988)
- Milroy, L, "Observing and Analyzing Natural Language" (1987), Blackwell
- Pizziconi, B, "Re-examination, Face and the Japanese Language", Journal of Pragmatics, 35, pp.1471~1506 (2003)
- Reiter, R. M, "Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Request and Apology" (2000), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Sohn, H. M, "Linguistic Expedition" (1986), Han Shin Publishing Company
- Spencer-O, H, "Identity Perspectives on Face and (im)Politeness", Journal of Pragmatics, 39(Guest editors of Special Issue), pp.1~4 (2007)
- ten Have, P, "Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide" (1999), Sage Publications
- Wierzbicka, A, "The Theory of Cultural Scripts as a Tool of Cross-cultural Communication", Korean Linguistics, Korean Linguistic Conference, 통권 : 18, pp.191~218 (2003)
- Yum, J. O, "Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives, In Korean Philosophy and Communication" (1987), Academic Press
- Yum, J. O, "The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia", Communication Monographs, 55 (1988)