이란 외교 정책의 정체성 연구: 구성주의 시각에서 본 이란-미국 갈등
A Study on the Identity of Iran’s Foreign Policy: The Conflict between Iran and the US through Constructivist Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the Islamic Revolution in 1979 understanding Iranian foreign policy has been a difficult subject for both foreign policy scholars and experts. They have usually been surprised by the Islamic Republic of Iran’s behavior because they could not explain and predict its action and reaction in the context of mainstream foreign policy approaches. The aim of this study is to analyze the formation process of Iranian foreign policy behaviour toward the US through constructivist approach. The main argument of this study is that in order to understand Iranian foreign policy behaviour, the meaning and identity of the Islamic Revolution must be analyzed and understood more deeply. The purpose of this study is to explain that the basic idea and meaning structure of the Islamic Revolution was formed on the basis of dar al-Islam and dar al-Kufr, so it is different from the ideology of the US. This concept has emerged as a major conflict factor, defining the confrontation between Iran and the US as a hostile relationship.
Abstract
After the Islamic Revolution in 1979 understanding Iranian foreign policy has been a difficult subject for both foreign policy scholars and experts. They have usually been surprised by the Islamic Republic of Iran’s behavior because they could not explain and predict its action and reaction in the context of mainstream foreign policy approaches. The aim of this study is to analyze the formation process of Iranian foreign policy behaviour toward the US through constructivist approach. The main argument of this study is that in order to understand Iranian foreign policy behaviour, the meaning and identity of the Islamic Revolution must be analyzed and understood more deeply. The purpose of this study is to explain that the basic idea and meaning structure of the Islamic Revolution was formed on the basis of dar al-Islam and dar al-Kufr, so it is different from the ideology of the US. This concept has emerged as a major conflict factor, defining the confrontation between Iran and the US as a hostile relationship.
참고문헌 (12)
- Amanat, Abas, "Apocalyptic Islam and Iranian Shiism" (2009), I.B. Tauris
- Amjad, Mohammad, "Siast va Hokumat dar lyalat-e Mottahedeh" (2011), Samt Publication
- Khomeini, Ruhollah, "Syasat-e Khareji va Ravabet-e Beinolmelal az Didgah-e Emam Khomeini" (2002), Institute for Publications of Imam Khomein’s Works
- Mohammadi, Manoochehr, "Esterategi-e Nezami-e Amrica bad az 11 September" (2003), Soroush Publication
- Onuf, Nicholas, "The Constitution of International Society", European Journal of International Law, 5(1), pp.1~19 (1994)
- Ramezani, Rouhollah, "Charchoobi Tahlili baray-e Syast-e Kharji-e Jomhuri-e Eslam-e Iran" (2001), Nashr-e Nei
- Sadjadpour, Mohammad-Kazem, "Siasat-e Khareji-e Iran: Chand Goftar dar Arseh-haye Nazari va Amali" (2002), Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publication
- Sariolghamla, Mahmoud, "Iran va Jahani Shodan: Chalesh-ha va Rah-e Halha" (2005), Center for Strategic Research
- Tajik, Mohammad Reza, "Syasat-e Khareji: Arsehy-e Feghdan-e Tasmim va Tadbir" (2004), Center for Strategic Research
- Wendt, Alexander, "The Agent-Structure Problem In International Relations Theory", International Organization, 41(3), pp.335~370 (1987)
- Wendt, Alexander, "Anarchy Is What States Make of It", International Organization, 46(2), pp.391~425 (1992)
- Wendt, Alexander, "Construction International Politics", International Security, 20(1), pp.71~81 (1995)