미국의 대 ‘중동관’ 및 ‘이슬람관’에 대한 연구
A Study on the US’s Viewpoints in Middle East and Islam
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to analyze the US’s viewpoints in Middle East and Islam. In addition, this paper studies the Middle East policy of US on the basis of the viewpoints in Middle East and Islam. The viewpoint in Middle East of the US Executive can be usually found in the doctrine based on the diplomacy policy of US. Namely, when researching the doctrines of the US president, what is based on Middle East is called the viewpoint in Middle East. Strictly speaking, the viewpoint in Middle East is that of the US Executive or the recognition of the US Executive that decides the Middle East policy. Thus, it can be regarded as the perception that decides the Middle East policy of the US. The viewpoint in Islam can be also considered as the US’s comprehensive recognition on Islam religion or the US’s viewpoint which is based on the policy towards Islamic armed group. For the US Executive, especially, the viewpoint in Islam focuses on the Islamic armed group. Thus, this research is a paper that studies the US’s conception or recognition on Middle East or Islam in terms of the viewpoint in Middle East, and the US’s viewpoint or perspective on the politic Islamic circle in terms of the viewpoint in Islam, and in this sense this paper examines Middle East policy of the US . From the system of cold war to 1990, the most important issue of the US was to present and implement the policies for existence and profit of the US, resisting against the USSR in communism system. Thus, at that time the US’s viewpoints in Middle East and Islam were set by focusing on the USSR of the rival relation. Namely, the US and the USSR were in the competitive relation of power in Middle East each other. In this context, the viewpoint in Islam was established and the Middle East policy was taken. The viewpoint in Islam can be investigated in terms of the Islamic revolution of Iran. As 'Islamic Revivalism' was originated in Iran, Iran Islam revolution occurred and there was the tremendous cultural shock caused by the hostage case toward the US Embassy in Teheran. Nevertheless, the US regarded 'Islamic Revivalism' as less important issue because of the policy restraining the USSR. After the collapse of system of cold war, the US took the Middle East policy based on the concepts of main enemy and axis of evil.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to analyze the US’s viewpoints in Middle East and Islam. In addition, this paper studies the Middle East policy of US on the basis of the viewpoints in Middle East and Islam. The viewpoint in Middle East of the US Executive can be usually found in the doctrine based on the diplomacy policy of US. Namely, when researching the doctrines of the US president, what is based on Middle East is called the viewpoint in Middle East. Strictly speaking, the viewpoint in Middle East is that of the US Executive or the recognition of the US Executive that decides the Middle East policy. Thus, it can be regarded as the perception that decides the Middle East policy of the US. The viewpoint in Islam can be also considered as the US’s comprehensive recognition on Islam religion or the US’s viewpoint which is based on the policy towards Islamic armed group. For the US Executive, especially, the viewpoint in Islam focuses on the Islamic armed group. Thus, this research is a paper that studies the US’s conception or recognition on Middle East or Islam in terms of the viewpoint in Middle East, and the US’s viewpoint or perspective on the politic Islamic circle in terms of the viewpoint in Islam, and in this sense this paper examines Middle East policy of the US . From the system of cold war to 1990, the most important issue of the US was to present and implement the policies for existence and profit of the US, resisting against the USSR in communism system. Thus, at that time the US’s viewpoints in Middle East and Islam were set by focusing on the USSR of the rival relation. Namely, the US and the USSR were in the competitive relation of power in Middle East each other. In this context, the viewpoint in Islam was established and the Middle East policy was taken. The viewpoint in Islam can be investigated in terms of the Islamic revolution of Iran. As 'Islamic Revivalism' was originated in Iran, Iran Islam revolution occurred and there was the tremendous cultural shock caused by the hostage case toward the US Embassy in Teheran. Nevertheless, the US regarded 'Islamic Revivalism' as less important issue because of the policy restraining the USSR. After the collapse of system of cold war, the US took the Middle East policy based on the concepts of main enemy and axis of evil.
참고문헌 (23)
- 노암 촘스키 하워드 진, "미국의 이라크 전쟁-전쟁과 경제제재의 참상" (2002), 북막스
- 소에지마 다카히코, "누가미국을 움직이는가" (2003), 들녘
- Arts’, Paul, "The new nil order. William C. Ramsay. Oil in the 1990s: The gulf dominant. Phebe Marr and William Lewis (eds.). Riding the tiger. Boulder. Colo: Westview Press. 5", ~ (1993)
- Benvinisti,Meron, "Preemptive warnings of fantastic sccenarios. Ha‘aretz. August. 15", ~ (2002)
- Bernard, Reich, "United states interests in the middle east. H. Shaked & I. Rabinovich. eds. The middle east and the united states. London: Transaction Books. 183", ~ (1980)
- Brzezinski, Zbigniew, "Power and principle: memoirs of the national security adviser" (1983), Farrar. Straus and Giroux
- Campbell, Jhon C., "Defense of the middle east: Problems of american policy" (1969), Harper & Row
- Clinton, Bill, "Remarks, by president Bill Clinton to the jordanian parliament”. The White House: Office of the Press Secretary. Amman. Jordan. 26. October. 3", ~ (1994)
- Cottam,Richard W., "U.S. and Soviet responses to islamic political militancy. Neither east nor west: iran, the soviet union and the united states. ed Nikki R. Keddie & Mark J. Gasi. 282-284", ~ (1990)
- Djerejian, Edward. P., "U.S.policy on recent developments and other issues in the middle east", ~ (1993)
- Esoposito, John L., "The global impact of the iranian revolution: a policy perspective. The Iranian revolution :Its global impact. Miami: Florida International University Press. 317", ~ (1990)
- Esposito, Jhon L., "The islamic threat: myth or reality" (1992), Oxford University Press.
- Gerges, Fawaz A., "America and political islam" (1999), Cambridge University Press.
- Gorden, Michael R., "Iraq said to plan tangling U.S. in street fighting. New York Times. August. 26" (2002)
- Hunter, Shireen T., "Iran and the world" (1990), Indiana University Press.
- Indyk, Martin, "The clinton administration's approach to the middle east. Challenges to U.S. interests in the middle east: obstacls and opportunities. ed. Y. Mirsky. Matt Ahrens & J. Sultan. Washington DC: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. May. 1", ~ (1993)
- Neff, Donald, "Clinton's total commitment to Israel. Middle East International. No. 525. 10 May. 4", ~ (1996)
- Pelletreau, Robert, "Statement before the subcommittee on europe and the middle east of the house foreign affairs committee. 4. October 1994. U.S. department of state dispatch. 10. October. 1994. 2", ~ (1994)
- Ricks, Thomas E., "Some top military brass favor status quo in iraq: Containment seen less risky than attack. Washington post. 28. July. A 1", ~ (2002)
- Russell,Francis J., "U.S. political toward nasser. Foreign relations of the united stats: suez crises. 1956 vol. 16. Washington. DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 86, 142", ~ (1989)
- Warren,Christopher, "Statement by secretary of state Warren Christopher regarding U.S. sanctions against iran. Federal News Service, 1. May. 1-3", ~ (1995)
- Weinberger, Casper, "Fighting for peace: seven critical years in the pentagon" (1990), Warner Book
- Wright, Robin, "Sacred rage: the wrath of militant islam" (1985), Simon and Schuster