北魏 後期 ‘국제도시’ 洛陽과 출현 배경
Luoyang, the Cosmopolitan City of Multi-racial Residents and Coexistence of Multiculture in the Second half of BeiWei dynasty and its Background
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the Chinese historic materials, Luoyangjialanji, epitaphs excavated in Luoyang, in the capital of BeiWei dynasty, Luoyang was the cosmopolitan city where Xianbei rulers, including Royal families and Xianbei noblemen called Xunchenbacheng, Chinese civil officials, the Central Asians, the Goguryo peoples, Turk nomads, the Arabs, African people and Chinese commoners, and so on. According to the Luoyangjialanji, the population of Luoyang was about 109,000 households, of which the Central Asians were 10,000 households, and capitulants from Nanchao were 3,000 households. the Central Asians were 9.1% of Luoyang households, and the foreighners were at least 11.9% of Luoyang households. The most populous residents in Luoyang were probaly the Xianbei People moved from Pingcheng, the old capital city to Luoyang, the new capital city who changed the permanent address from Dai to Luoyang Henan, lived in the Luoyang city and were buried in Beimangshan, a famous cemetery of ruling class. Luoyang, the cosmopolitan city was the salad bowl where the people from China, Mongolia, Manchuria, Central Asia, and India etc. and coexisted in multiculture of Confucian culture and buildings, Buddhism and Buddhist temples, nomadic and Central Asian food, life style, music, dancing, hunt and circus. Sitongshi, the international trade market in the south of Luoyang city was the symbol of the cosmopolitan city Luoyang, and the place of multi-race people’s meetings and economic exchanges. Central Asian goods were traded in Sitongshi and consumed by Xianbei rulers. In short, Luoyang, the capital city of the second half of BeiWei dynasty was the cosmopolitan city prior to Chang’an, the capital city of Tang dynasty. Luoyang became the cosmopolitan city of Multi-racial Residents and Coexistence of Multiculture in the Second half of BeiWei dynasty, because of Xianbei rulers's relative openness of the engagement of the conquested multi-ethnic people and the trade policy of Xuanwudi, which brought about the incoming of the Central Asians, Indians, and Arab traders.
Abstract
According to the Chinese historic materials, Luoyangjialanji, epitaphs excavated in Luoyang, in the capital of BeiWei dynasty, Luoyang was the cosmopolitan city where Xianbei rulers, including Royal families and Xianbei noblemen called Xunchenbacheng, Chinese civil officials, the Central Asians, the Goguryo peoples, Turk nomads, the Arabs, African people and Chinese commoners, and so on. According to the Luoyangjialanji, the population of Luoyang was about 109,000 households, of which the Central Asians were 10,000 households, and capitulants from Nanchao were 3,000 households. the Central Asians were 9.1% of Luoyang households, and the foreighners were at least 11.9% of Luoyang households. The most populous residents in Luoyang were probaly the Xianbei People moved from Pingcheng, the old capital city to Luoyang, the new capital city who changed the permanent address from Dai to Luoyang Henan, lived in the Luoyang city and were buried in Beimangshan, a famous cemetery of ruling class. Luoyang, the cosmopolitan city was the salad bowl where the people from China, Mongolia, Manchuria, Central Asia, and India etc. and coexisted in multiculture of Confucian culture and buildings, Buddhism and Buddhist temples, nomadic and Central Asian food, life style, music, dancing, hunt and circus. Sitongshi, the international trade market in the south of Luoyang city was the symbol of the cosmopolitan city Luoyang, and the place of multi-race people’s meetings and economic exchanges. Central Asian goods were traded in Sitongshi and consumed by Xianbei rulers. In short, Luoyang, the capital city of the second half of BeiWei dynasty was the cosmopolitan city prior to Chang’an, the capital city of Tang dynasty. Luoyang became the cosmopolitan city of Multi-racial Residents and Coexistence of Multiculture in the Second half of BeiWei dynasty, because of Xianbei rulers's relative openness of the engagement of the conquested multi-ethnic people and the trade policy of Xuanwudi, which brought about the incoming of the Central Asians, Indians, and Arab traders.
참고문헌 (68)
- 劉昫, "舊唐書" (1975), 中華書局
- 范祥雍, "洛陽伽藍記" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
- 李百藥, "北齊書" (1972), 中華書局
- 李延壽, "北史" (1974), 中華書局
- 魏徵, "隋書" (1973), 中華書局
- 魏收, "魏書" (1974), 中華書局
- 司馬光, "資治通鑑" (1956), 中華書局
- 李昉, "太平御覽" (1998), 中華書局
- 趙超, "漢魏南北朝墓誌彙編" (1992), 天津古籍出版社
- 周紹良, "唐代墓誌彙編" (1992), 上海古籍出版社
- "서울시의 통계포탈"[URL]
- "新华网" (2010)[URL]
- 이시다 미키노스케, "장안의 봄" (2004), 이산
- 千寬宇, "인물로 본 한국 고대사" (1982), 정음문화사
- 최진열, "북위황제 순행과 호한사회" (2011), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 최진열, "효문제의 ‘한화’ 정책과 낙양 호인사회―북위 후기 호속 유지 현상과 그 배경" (2016), 한울아카데미
- 朱大渭, "魏晉南北朝社會生活史" (2005), 中國社會科學出版社
- 洛陽市文物工作隊, "洛陽文物圖案集" (1991), 朝華出版社
- 呂一飛, "胡族習俗與隋唐風韻―魏晉北朝北方少數民族社會風俗及其對隋唐的影向" (1994), 書目文獻出版社
- 孫同勛, "拓跋氏的漢化及其他" (2006), 稻鄕出版社
- 姚薇元, "北朝胡姓考" (1962), 中華書局
- 高路加, "高姓群體的歷史與傳統" (1997), 內蒙古大學出版社
- 劉淑芬, "六朝的城市與社會" (1992), 臺灣學生書局
- 石雲濤, "三至六世紀絲綢之路的變遷" (2007), 文化藝術出版社
- 前田正名, "平城の歷史地理學的硏究" (1979), 風間書房
- 박한제, "隋唐 長安城의 市場風景 - 胡漢文化의 交流와 統合의 現場 -", 역사교육, (84) (2002), 역사교육연구회
- 최진열, "北魏前期 近侍官의 性格- 「文成帝南巡碑」의 분석을 중심으로 -", 역사문화연구, (28), pp.37~66 (2007), 역사문화연구소
- 최진열, "北魏後期 洛陽거주 胡人들의 생활과 문화 ― 孝文帝의 ‘漢化政策’의 재검토 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (24), pp.379~433 (2010), 중국고중세사학회
- 최진열, "北魏後期 胡語사용 현상과 그 배경", 중국고중세사연구, (23), pp.195~246 (2010), 중국고중세사학회
- 최진열, "北魏 平城時代 胡人들의 생활과 습속 - 胡俗 유지와 그 배경을 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (149), pp.283~326 (2010), 국학연구원
- 최진열, "유목국가·이민족왕조의 통치체제 정비·운영과 定住·農耕民의 역할", 고구려발해연구, 46, pp.145~195 (2013), 고구려발해학회
- 최진열, "北魏後期 洛陽 거주 西域人과 西域文化", 대동문화연구, (87), pp.241~278 (2014), 대동문화연구원
- 최진열, "北魏後期 胡語 금지 再論", 역사와교육, (19), pp.199~230 (2014), 역사교과서연구소
- 崔珍烈, "北魏 後期 北邊 胡人의 胡俗 유지와 그 영향―雁臣과 洛陽 胡俗의 관계를 중심으로", 人文學硏究, 22 (2014)
- 최진열, "북위(北魏)후기의 국제도시 낙양(洛陽)- 종족 분포와 다문화 공존을 중심으로", 도시인문학연구, 7(2), pp.135~178 (2015), 도시인문학연구소
- 賈文慧, "從≪洛陽伽藍記≫看北魏洛陽城里坊布局特徵", 赤峰學院學報(漢文哲學社會科學版), 34(1) (2013)
- 高西省, "北魏楊機墓陶俑的藝術特色", 上海文博論叢, 2008(2) (2008)
- 郭畵曉, "洛陽北魏彩繪陶俑", 文物世界, 2009(5) (2009)
- 仇鹿鳴, "“攀附先世”與“僞冒士籍”―以渤海高氏爲中心的硏究", 歷史硏究 (2008)
- 陶華榮, "論慕容諸燕降臣與北魏的合作與對抗", 碩士, pp.2016
- 逯耀東, "從平城到洛陽―拓跋魏文化轉變的歷程" (2006), 中華書局
- 薛瑞澤, "論北魏河洛地區的飮食", 河南科技大學學報(社會科學版), 30(5) (2012)
- 楊共樂, "洛陽出土東羅馬金幣銘文考析", 中國歷史文物 (2008)
- 閆江涌, "魏晉南北朝時期中外音樂交流硏究", 碩士, pp.2007
- 葉萬松, "漢魏洛陽故城硏究" (2000), 科學出版社
- 王玲, "《齊民要術》與北朝胡漢飮食文化的融合", 中國農史 (2005)
- 劉斌, "洛陽北魏節閔帝元恭墓", 大衆考古 (2014)
- 劉羽迪, "北魏時期壁畵中的樂器世界", 理論硏究音樂 (2011)
- 李建棟, "西域胡戎樂在北魏的傳播與被接受", 學術月刊, 39(5) (2007)
- 李凭, "東方傳統" (1999), 中國發展出版社
- 李凭, "北魏平城時代" (2000), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 李雅靜, "河南洛陽北魏古墓發現一枚拜占庭金幣", 中國地名 (2014)
- 張金龍, "北魏政治與制度論稿" (2002), 甘肅敎育出版社
- 張敏, "北魏前期農牧關係的演變", 許昌學院學報, 24(4) (2005)
- 張承宗, "北朝硏究 1" (1999), 北京燕山出版社
- 翟景雲, "略論北魏前期音樂及其影響", 樂府學, 4 (2009)
- 丁磊, "論北魏對異國歸降王室的安撫措施", 碩士, pp.2015
- 周一良, "『周一良集』 第貳卷 魏晉南北朝史札記" (1988), 遼寧敎育出版社
- 周積明, "魏晉南北朝時期的胡漢文化衝突", 中南民族學院學報․哲社版 (1991)
- 陳寅恪, "陳寅恪魏晉南北朝史講演錄" (1987), 黃山書社
- 馮敏, "“胡俗入雅, 幾度興廢”―北魏宮廷雅樂的沿革初探", 北方音樂, 2015(17)통권 : 281 (2015)
- 古賀昭岑, "北魏における徙民と計口受田について", 九州大學東洋史論集, 1 (1973)
- 掛田良雄, "『洛陽伽藍記』に見える西域人", 防衛大学校紀要 (人文科学分冊), 92 (2006)
- 前田正名, "平城の歷史地理學的硏究" (1979), 風間書房
- 前田正名, "平城の歷史地理學的硏究" (1979), 風間書房
- 佐藤圭四郞, "イスラㅡム商業史の硏究―附東西文化交流史" (1981), 同朋舍出版
- 河地重造, "北魏王朝の成立とその性格について―徙民政策の展開から均田制へ", 東洋史研究, 12(5) (1953)
- Holmgren, Jennifer, "Marriage, Kinship and Power in Northern China" (1995), Variorum
