北魏後期 洛陽거주 胡人들의 생활과 문화 ― 孝文帝의 ‘漢化政策’의 재검토 ―
The Xianbeis’ Nomadic or Pastoral Culture in After Xiaowen Emperor’s polocy of Sincization in Beiwei Period
1
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay is to give careful consideration to a problem of Sinicization in the later period of Beiwei. Chinese Students have been arguing that the nomads including Xianbi, Xiongnu, Jie, Qiang, Di and so forth, who immigrated from Mongol Plateau, Manchuria and Tibet Plateau, were adapted to Chinese civilization, or their culture, lifestyle and customs. I examined all the materials for nomads or pastoral men’s life and culture in the later period of Beiwei and found that they were not sinicized and maintained their own culture, lifestyle and customs, which they put on nomadic-style fur coats, hats, trousers, or riding breeches, ate mutton, other meats, and dairy goods. They went hunting, shooted an arrow with joy and military training, sang their nomadic-style songs, danced to the their original musics and enjoyed their nomad festivals. The wild geese courtiers, who had served in Luoyang court in autumn and winter and then had returned to their homes in pastoral region, slept in their ger or yurt, moving tent made of furs and wooden frames, in their pastoral birthplace in spring and summer. The nomad-oriented rulers in the later period of Beiwei were not actually sinicized facet. So I argues that the nomad people in Luoyang in the later period of Beiwei shoud not be entirely sinicized and maintain their own lifestyle and customs in part.
Abstract
This essay is to give careful consideration to a problem of Sinicization in the later period of Beiwei. Chinese Students have been arguing that the nomads including Xianbi, Xiongnu, Jie, Qiang, Di and so forth, who immigrated from Mongol Plateau, Manchuria and Tibet Plateau, were adapted to Chinese civilization, or their culture, lifestyle and customs. I examined all the materials for nomads or pastoral men’s life and culture in the later period of Beiwei and found that they were not sinicized and maintained their own culture, lifestyle and customs, which they put on nomadic-style fur coats, hats, trousers, or riding breeches, ate mutton, other meats, and dairy goods. They went hunting, shooted an arrow with joy and military training, sang their nomadic-style songs, danced to the their original musics and enjoyed their nomad festivals. The wild geese courtiers, who had served in Luoyang court in autumn and winter and then had returned to their homes in pastoral region, slept in their ger or yurt, moving tent made of furs and wooden frames, in their pastoral birthplace in spring and summer. The nomad-oriented rulers in the later period of Beiwei were not actually sinicized facet. So I argues that the nomad people in Luoyang in the later period of Beiwei shoud not be entirely sinicized and maintain their own lifestyle and customs in part.
참고문헌 (90)
- "中華書局 標點校勘本에", ~
- 松下憲一, "北魏道武帝の｢部族解散", 史朋, 34, pp.17~24 (2002)
- 崔珍烈, "北魏의 種族政策 : ‘부족해산’의 실상과 對‘部落首領’ 정책을 중심으로", 중국고중세사연구, 10, pp.31~97 (2003), 중국고중세사학회
- 李凭, "北魏平城時代", pp.36~60 (2000), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 朴漢濟, "魏晉-隋唐時代 胡族君主의 中華帝王으로의 變身過程과 그 論理―‘多民族國家’ 形成의 一 契機에 대한 探索―", 중앙아시아연구, 9, pp.1~28 (2004), 중앙아시아학회
- 管萍, "北魏平城政權的胡化與漢化", 석사, pp.2006
- 張德壽, "北魏早期朝廷體制的變動與漢化的曲折推進", 學術探索, 2002-4 (2002)
- 曹道衡, "魏太武帝和鮮卑拓跋氏的漢化", 齊魯學刊 (2002)
- 何德章, "北魏初年的漢化制度與天賜二年的倒退", 中國史硏究, pp.17~26 (2001)
- 何德章, "“陰山却霜”之俗解 In 魏晉南北朝隋唐史資料", pp.12~110 (1993), 武漢出版社
- 崔珍烈, "北魏皇帝의 巡幸 硏究-‘遊牧的 君主’의 통치행위와 그 변천과정을 중심으로-", 박사, 東洋史學科, pp.2007
- 최진열, "北魏 平城時代 胡人들의 생활과 습속 - 胡俗 유지와 그 배경을 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (149), pp.283~326 (2010), 국학연구원
- 于春梅, "中國文化傳統與北魏孝文帝改革", 齊齊哈爾大學學報 (2001)
- 曹淑萍, "論北魏“孝文改制”的歷史特點", 宿州師專學報, 17(3) (2002)
- 趙野春, "鮮卑漢化-論北魏孝文帝改革對民族關係的調整", 西北民族硏究, (37), pp.31~40 (2003)
- 岳雪蓮, "從北魏孝文帝改革看拓跋鮮卑的文化變遷", 湖北經濟學院學報(人文社會科學版), 4(3) (2007)
- 馮帆, "靑齊士人在北魏漢化中的作用", 山東省農業管理幹部學院學報, 22(6) (2006)
- 康樂, "從西郊到南郊 - 國家祭典與北魏政治 -", pp.166~280 (1995), 稻鄕出版社
- 李書吉, "北朝禮制法系硏究" (2002), 人民出版社
- "北魏孝文帝時期的禮制建設", 烟臺大學學報(哲社版), 16(4), pp.453~455 (2003)
- 劉懷榮, "北魏的漢化歷程與歌詩藝術考論", 中國詩歌硏究, pp.94~110
- 高凱, "從性比例失調看北魏時期拓跋鮮卑與漢族的民族融合", 史學理論硏究, pp.43~53 (2000)
- 彭體用, "從鮮·漢統治階級的逐步合流看北魏統治的强固", 中南民族學院學報 (1985)
- 錢國旗, "北魏統治集團民族界限的淡化及其對鮮漢民族融合的影向", 靑島師傳學報 (1994)
- 趙向群, "孝文帝的漢化政策與拓跋民族精神的喪失", 許昌學院學報, 22(6) (2003)
- 郝松枝, "全般漢化與北魏王朝的速亡 - 北魏孝文帝改革的經驗與敎訓", 陝西師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 32(1), pp.73~77 (2004)
- 李春玲, "簡論鮮卑漢化與北朝興衰", 理論界 (2008)
- 方國瑜, "南北朝時期內地與邊境各族的大遷移及融合", 民族硏究 (1982)
- 白翠琴, "論魏晉南北朝時期民族的遷徙與融合", 中央民族學院學報 (1987)
- 白翠琴, "論魏晉南北朝民族融合對漢族發展的影向", 社會科學戰線 (1990)
- 錢國旗, "論南遷拓跋鮮卑與漢族融合過程中共同心理素質的形成", 南京大學學報 (1991)
- 施光明, "魏晉南北朝交融三題", 文史哲 (1993)
- 李紅艶, "對魏晉南北朝時期北方民族融合模式的探討", 烟臺大學學報 (1999)
- 王福應, "魏晉南北朝時期北方民族大遷徙與大融合論略", 忻州師範學院學報 (2000)
- 劉振華, "民族融合與文化整合 - 論陳寅恪魏晉南北朝史硏究-", 揚州大學學報 (2001)
- 羅君, "魏晉南北朝時期民族融和的段階性和地區特點", 新疆敎育學院學報 (2003)
- 朱大渭, "儒家民族觀與十六國北朝民族的融合及其歷史影向", 中國史硏究 (2004)
- 胡祥琴, "民族政權構成與魏晉南北朝時期的胡漢融合", 西北第二民族學院學報 (2005)
- 唐長孺, "拓跋族的漢化過程", pp.132~154 (1959), 三聯書店
- 陳寅恪, "北魏後期的漢化(孝文帝的漢化政策) In 萬繩楠 정리, 陳寅恪魏晉南北朝史講演錄", pp.254~267 (1987), 黃山書社
- 周積明, "魏晉南北朝時期的胡漢文化衝突", 中南民族學院學報․哲社版, pp.6~8 (1991)
- 湯奪先, "北魏孝文帝改革鮮卑族生活方式", 民族敎育硏究, 12, pp.76~79 (2001)
- 孫同勛, "拓跋氏的漢化及其他", pp.3~176 (2006), 稻鄕出版社
- 許永濤, "試論北魏政權的漢化", 黑龍江史誌, (222) (2010)
- 姚紅艶, "略論孝文帝漢化改革的動力來源", 徐州敎育學院學報, 23-1 (2008)
- 李培棟, "北魏太和改制前胡漢形勢論", 上海師範大學學報, pp.83~85 (1994)
- 趙士田, "馮太后․孝文帝改革芻議", 絲路學刊 (1996)
- 祁美琴, "關于十年來“漢化”及其相關門題硏究的考察", 西域硏究, pp.103~113 (2006)
- 張元興, "近二十餘年魏晉南北朝少數民族與漢族交融史硏究綜述", 黑龍江民族叢刊(雙月刊), 통권 : 99, pp.78~83 (2007)
- 古賀昭岑, "北魏の部族解散について", 東方學, 59 (1980)
- 최진열, "雲崗石窟 曇曜五窟 五帝의 재해석―廟號와 國號로 본 北魏의 정체성―", 중앙아시아연구, 10, pp.1~23 (2005), 중앙아시아학회
- 逯耀東, "北魏前期的文化與政治形態 In 從平城到洛陽 - 拓跋魏文化轉變的歷程 -", pp.43~65 (2006), 中華書局
- 呂一飛, "胡族習俗與隋唐風韻 - 魏晉北朝北方少數民族社會風俗及其對隋唐的影向 -" (1994), 書目文獻出版社
- 劉錫濤, "南北朝時期中原地區的生活胡風現象", 新疆大學學報 (2001)
- 葛劍雄, "中國移民史 In 第二卷先秦至魏晉南北朝時期", pp.587~591 (1997), 福建人民出版社
- 張金龍, "北魏後期的直閤將軍與 “直衛” 諸職", 文史哲, pp.29~34 (1999)
- 최 진 열, "北魏後期 친위부대의 정치개입과 그 배경-領軍府의 구조·인적구성·정치개입방식을 중심으로-", 역사문화연구, (30), pp.279~310 (2008), 역사문화연구소
- "漢魏南北朝墓誌彙編", 天津古籍出版社, 196~ (1992)
- 미야자키 이치사다, "구품관인법의 연구", pp.18~465 (2002), 소나무
- 鹽澤裕仁, "鮮卑の都城 “平城” - その都市空間の樣相 -", 法政史學, 68, pp.26~ (2007)
- 石松日奈子, "北魏佛敎美術中の胡服像", 중국사연구, 35(35), pp.77~97 (2005), 중국사학회
- 高敏, "《南齊書․魏虜傳》書後 In 魏晉南北朝史發微", pp.286~288 (2005), 中華書局
- 朱大渭, "魏晉南北朝社會生活史", pp.15~ (2005), 中國社會科學出版社
- 竺小恩, "從北魏服飾改革看胡漢文化關係", 河西學院學報, 22(4), pp.30~ (2006)
- 中國社會科學院考古硏究所河南二隊, "河南偃師縣杏園村的四座北魏墓", 北京圖書館出版社, ~ (1997)
- 洛陽市第二文物工作隊, "洛陽紗廠西路HM555發掘簡報", 洛陽考古集成
- 劉錫濤, "北朝時期中原地區的生活胡風現象", 北朝硏究, 1, pp.363~366 (1999), 北京燕山出版社
- 商春芳, "洛陽北魏墓女俑服飾淺論", 華夏考古 (2000)
- 孫同勛, "拓跋氏的漢化及其他", pp.122~123 (2006), 稻鄕出版社
- 장징(張競), "공자의 식탁", pp.97~125 (2002), 뿌리와 이파리
- 張承宗, "魏晉南北朝飮食風俗硏究", 北朝硏究, 1, pp.345~346 (1999), 北京燕山出版社
- 逯耀東, "《崔氏食經》的歷史與文化意義 In 從平城到洛陽 - 拓跋魏文化轉變的歷程 -", pp.121~122 (2006), 中華書局
- 翟景雲, "略論北魏前期音樂及其影響", 樂府學, 4, pp.34~ (2009)
- 趙海麗, "魚文化與羊文化 -《洛陽伽藍記》所述南北朝文化衝突與交融探論 -", 理論學刊, 152 (2006)
- 張敏, "北魏前期農牧關係的演變", 許昌學院學報, 24-4, pp.39~ (2005)
- 姚薇元, "北朝胡姓考", pp.87~ (1962), 中華書局
- 朱大渭, "北魏的國營畜牧業經濟", 六朝史論, pp.348~ (2005), 中國社會科學出版社
- 周一良, "馬場", 565~566
- Cleaves, Franscis Woodman, "The Sino-mongolian Inscription of 1338: In Memory of Jigümtei", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 14-1, pp.53~67 (1951)
- 朴漢濟, "五胡 赫連夏國의 都城 統萬城의 選址와 그 構造 : 胡族國家의 都城經營方式", 東洋史學硏究, 69, pp.73~124 (2000)
- 陳烈, "遼代部族軍考", 昭鳥達師專學報․漢文哲社版, pp.78~79 (1992)
- 趙翼, "卄二史箚記 In 卄二史箚記校證" (1984), 中華書局
- 劉長旭, "十六國ㆍ北朝遊牧民族赤水崇拜與投尸入河習俗稽釋", 社會科學輯刊, 통권 : 140 (2002)
- 川本芳昭, "北魏における身分制について In 魏晋南北朝時代の民族問題", pp.345~352 (1998), 汲古書院
- 최진열, "北魏後期 胡語사용 현상과 그 배경", 중국고중세사연구, (23), pp.195~246 (2010), 중국고중세사학회
- 張金龍, "北魏後期禁衛武官制度", 魏晉南北朝禁衛武官制度硏究, pp.751~ (2004), 中華書局
- 羅新, "北魏直勤考", 37~
- 羅新, "跋北魏太武帝東巡碑", 177~186
- 羅新, "北魏孝文帝弔比干碑的立碑時間", 中古北族名號硏究, 253~258
- 山本德子, "北朝系婦人の妬忌について ~ 北魏を中心として", ~