北魏後期 洛陽 출토 陶俑의 服飾 分析 ― 胡服 착용 여부의 통계적 검토 ―
The Analysis of Pottery Figurines' Clothes in Tombs of Northern Wei Period in Luoyang: Examination of Statistical Data to Wearing Hu-style(Xianbei-style), Han-style and Western Region-style dresses
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay is to examine the commonly accepted view of the prohibition on Hu-style(Xianbei-style) garments in A.D. 494, which banned Xianbei-based nomadic or pastoral people from wearing Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats. I overturned conventional wisdom of the prohibition on Hu-style(Xianbei-style) garments in 494, which was not observed thoroughly. I set forth evidence that after the ban of the emperor Xiaowen in A.D. 494 Xianbei people wore their traditional Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats. In this essay, I examine the dress and hat of the pottery figurines in excavated in tombs of Northern Wei period in Beimang Mountain, which is located in north of Luoyang, the capital of Northern Wei period. If the dresses and hats of the pottery figurines in excavated in tombs of Northern Wei period was reflected to that of Luoyang residents, ratio of Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats is 13.9%(or 10.8%), but that of Han(Chinese)-style garments and Western Region-style garments is 18.6% and 8.3% respectively. The mixture of Hu-style(Xianbei-style) and Han(Chinese)-style garments is 46.7%(or 49.8%). This showed that after the ban of the Xianbei-style garments, Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats were dressed both Xianbei-based nomadic or pastoral people and Chinese, Xianbei and Chinese costumes were mixed and influenced mutually. I don't deny the fact that there was Xianbei people to wear Chinese costumes but it was applied in their public lives and they wore Xianbei costumes in daily lives. I brought forward a reason to break partly the emperor Xiaowen's ban on weaing Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats that there was the decrease drop in temperature in period of Nanbeichao(Northern and Southern Dynasties) why Luoyang residents wore the Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats, which was better to protect them from the cold.
Abstract
This essay is to examine the commonly accepted view of the prohibition on Hu-style(Xianbei-style) garments in A.D. 494, which banned Xianbei-based nomadic or pastoral people from wearing Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats. I overturned conventional wisdom of the prohibition on Hu-style(Xianbei-style) garments in 494, which was not observed thoroughly. I set forth evidence that after the ban of the emperor Xiaowen in A.D. 494 Xianbei people wore their traditional Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats. In this essay, I examine the dress and hat of the pottery figurines in excavated in tombs of Northern Wei period in Beimang Mountain, which is located in north of Luoyang, the capital of Northern Wei period. If the dresses and hats of the pottery figurines in excavated in tombs of Northern Wei period was reflected to that of Luoyang residents, ratio of Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats is 13.9%(or 10.8%), but that of Han(Chinese)-style garments and Western Region-style garments is 18.6% and 8.3% respectively. The mixture of Hu-style(Xianbei-style) and Han(Chinese)-style garments is 46.7%(or 49.8%). This showed that after the ban of the Xianbei-style garments, Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats were dressed both Xianbei-based nomadic or pastoral people and Chinese, Xianbei and Chinese costumes were mixed and influenced mutually. I don't deny the fact that there was Xianbei people to wear Chinese costumes but it was applied in their public lives and they wore Xianbei costumes in daily lives. I brought forward a reason to break partly the emperor Xiaowen's ban on weaing Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats that there was the decrease drop in temperature in period of Nanbeichao(Northern and Southern Dynasties) why Luoyang residents wore the Hu-style(Xianbei-style) dresses and hats, which was better to protect them from the cold.
참고문헌 (58)
- "魏書", ~
- "資治通鑑", ~
- 趙超, "漢魏南北朝墓誌彙編" (1992), 天津古籍出版社
- 羅新, "新出魏晉南北朝墓志疏證" (2005), 中華書局
- 龍門石窟硏究所劉景龍, "長樂王丘目陵亮夫人尉遲造彌勒像記(1840) In 龍門石窟碑刻題記彙錄" (1998), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 劉昭民, "기후의 반역" (2005), 성균관대학교출판부
- 蘇哲, "魏晉南北朝壁畵墓の世界-繪に描かれた群雄割據と民族移動の時代" (2007), 白帝社
- 呂一飛, "胡族習俗與隋唐風韻-魏晉北朝北方少數民族社會風俗及其對隋唐的影向" (1994), 書目文獻出版社
- 吳宏岐, "西安歷史地理硏究" (2006), 西安地圖出版社
- 张丕远, "中国历史气候变化" (1996), 山东科学技术出版社
- 김용문, "북위(北魏)시대의 호복(胡服)연구", 한복문화, 12(3), pp.5~22 (2009), 한복문화학회
- 모리야스 다카오, "당대 불교적 세계지리와 ‘호’의 실태 In 실크로드의 삶과 종교" (2006), 사계절출판사
- 朴漢濟, "東魏-北齊時代의 胡漢體制의 展開-胡漢 葛藤과 二重構造-In 分裂과 統合-中國 中世의 諸相" (1998), 지식산업사
- 최진열, "北魏 平城時代 胡人들의 생활과 습속 - 胡俗 유지와 그 배경을 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (149), pp.283~326 (2010), 국학연구원
- 최진열, "北魏後期 洛陽거주 胡人들의 생활과 문화 ― 孝文帝의 ‘漢化政策’의 재검토 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (24), pp.379~433 (2010), 중국고중세사학회
- 崔珍烈, "北魏前期 皇室通婚정책-겹사돈婚의 만연과 그 정치적 기능을 중심으로", 역사와 교육, 11 (2010)
- 高西省, "北魏楊機墓陶俑的藝術特色", 上海文博論叢 (2008)
- 郭畵曉, "洛陽北魏彩繪陶俑", 文物世界 (2009)
- 洛陽博物館, "洛陽北魏楊機墓出土文書", 文物 (2007)
- 洛陽博物館, "洛陽北魏元邵墓 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 洛陽師範學院河洛文化國際硏究中心, "洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 洛陽市文物工作隊, "洛陽孟津北陳村北魏壁畵墓 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 洛陽市文物工作隊, "洛陽孟津晉墓·北魏墓發掘簡報 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 洛陽市第二文物工作隊, "洛陽考古發掘與硏究", 中原文物 (1996)
- 洛陽市第二文物工作隊, "洛陽紗廠西路北魏HM555發掘簡報 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 洛陽市第二文物工作隊, "洛陽衡山路北魏墓發掘簡報", 文物 (2009)
- 洛陽市第二文物工作隊, "偃師前杜樓北魏石棺墓發掘簡報", 文物 (2006)
- 馬旭東, "近十年北魏墓葬硏究綜述", 宜賓學院學報, 10(2) (2010)
- 毛陽光, "從《洛陽出土石刻時地記》看民國時期洛陽的盜墓風氣", 四川文物 (2010)
- 商春芳, "洛陽北魏墓女俑服飾淺論", 華夏考古 (2000)
- 北魏孝文帝遷都洛陽與氣候變化之硏究, "徐勝一", 臺灣師大, 38~ (2003)
- 石松日奈子, "龍門石窟和鞏縣石窟的漢服貴族供養人像-“主從形式供養人圖像”的成立-In 石窟寺硏究" (2010), 文物出版社
- 石華, "北魏婦女服飾硏究", 석사, pp.2008
- 孫同勛, "北魏末年與北齊時代的胡漢衝突 In 拓跋氏的漢化及其他-北魏史論文集" (2005), 稻鄕出版社
- 偃師商城博物館, "河南偃師南蔡莊北魏墓 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 偃師商城博物館, "河南偃師兩座北魏墓發掘簡報 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 余黎星, "洛陽北魏墓硏究", 洛陽師範學院學報 (2008)
- 倪潤安, "北魏洛陽時代墓葬的發現與硏究述評", 許昌學院學報, 29(3) (2010)
- 劉斌, "十六國北朝時期的甲騎具裝及甲騎具裝俑硏究", 석사, pp.2007
- 劉航宇, "北魏楊機墓出土文物賞介", 收藏家 (2006)
- 李梅田, "中原魏晉北朝墓葬文化的階段性", 華夏考古 (2004)
- 李凭, "上世紀洛陽地區北魏考古與北魏洛陽時代硏究", 國際中國學硏究, 4 (2001)
- 中國社會科學院考古硏究所洛陽漢魏城隊, "北魏宣武帝景陵發掘報告 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 中國社會科學院考古硏究所河南二隊, "河南偃師縣杏園村四座北魏墓 In 洛陽考古集成․秦漢魏晉南北朝卷" (2007), 北京圖書館出版社
- 陳垣, "二十史朔閏表" (1999), 中華書局
- 陳寅恪, "北齊的鮮卑化及西胡化 In 陳寅恪魏晉南北朝史講演錄" (1987), 黃山書社
- 竺可楨, "中國近五千年來氣候變遷 In 歷史地理硏究" (2002), 湖北敎育出版社
- 竺小恩, "從北魏服飾改革看胡漢文化關係", 河西學院學報, 22(4) (2006)
- 布雷特, "氣候變遷和中國歷史", 中國歷史地理論叢 (2003)
- 何德章, "論北魏孝文帝遷都事件", 魏晉南北朝隋唐史資料, ~ (1997)
- 河北省博物館, "河北曲陽發現北魏墓", 考古 (1972)
- 許福謙, "從北朝文化與民族的關係看東魏北齊的胡漢之爭", 中國魏晉南北朝史學會第四屆國際學術討論會 發表論文 (1992)
- 黃璠, "東魏·北齊·內部的胡·漢門題及其背景", 食貨, 6(8) (1971)
- 石松日奈子, "敦煌莫高窟第二八五窟北壁の供養者像と供養者題記", 龍谷史壇, 131 (2010)
- 石松日奈子, "北魏佛敎美術中の胡服像", 중국사연구, (35), pp.77~97 (2005), 중국사학회
- 石松日奈子, "中国佛教造像の供養者像-佛教美術史研究の新たな視點", 美術史, 160 (2006)
- 石松日奈子, "竜門古陽洞初期造像における中国化の問題", 佛敎藝術, 184 (1989)
- 窪添慶文, "河陰の變小考 In 魏晉南北朝官僚制硏究" (2003), 汲古書院