본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

통찰에 대한 실험연구는 통찰의 발생 과정을 반영하는가?: 통찰 실험연구에 있어 실험문제와 실험절차에 대한 제언

Does Experimental Insight Research Reflect Insight Process? A Proposal for Selecting Adequate Problems in Insight Experiment and Ecologically Valid Procedure of Insight Research

임웅|이경민
한국창의력교육학회 (Korean Society for Creativity Education)|2014.06|창의력교육연구 (The Journal of Creativity Education)|제14권 제2호|pp. 41-54

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

전략creativityperceptionstrategy지각창의통찰insightrestructuring재구조화저지식문제고지식문제knowledge-lean problemknowledge-rich problem

초록

통찰은 창의적인 산물이 만들어지는 과정에 결정적인 역할을 한다고 알려져 왔다. 하지만 통찰을 만드는 재료가 무엇인지에 대해서는 아직 완전한 합의가 이루어지지 못한 실정이다. 본 논문은 통찰의 과정을 밝히려는 실험연구에서 지속적으로 보고되는 상반된 연구결과의 원인을 분석하여, 이를 바탕으로 실험에 사용되는 실험문제와 실험절차에 대한 문제점을 지적한다. 또한 이러한 문제점을 해결하고 보다 타당한 연구결과를 도출할 수 있는 방법론적 설계에 대해 논의하고 있다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 방법론적 대안은 통찰의 발현기제와 관련 변인의 역할을 이해하는데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

It has been proposed that an insight is crucial to make creative product. However, there is no consensus yet what makes it and its process is. Moreover experimental research focused in this topic has reported controversial results. This study examined what makes this controversial results. The authors argued that these controversial ones were caused by using pure-insight problems and by one-step experimental procedure. This study proposed that it would be considered using hybrid-insight problems involved both perceptual functions and domain-related knowledge or strategy. In addition, two-step procedures would be better to confirm the difference between experimental and control group. These two proposals on this study may let the controversial results reconcile with.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 민경미, "신형태주의 관점에 기초한 통찰 연구 실험에 있어 지각 변인과 전략 변인의 혼재 가능성에 대한 검증", 영재와 영재교육, 11(3), pp.67~87 (2012), 한국영재교육학회
  2. 임웅, "통찰! 지각인가 혹은 지식인가? :인지의 하향처리과정으로서의 통찰", 영재와 영재교육, 8(3), pp.89~108 (2009), 한국영재교육학회
  3. 임웅, "통찰의 발현 기제에 대한 신형태주의 관점의 타당성 고찰", 창의력교육연구, 12(3), pp.57~74 (2012), 한국창의력교육학회
  4. Ash, I. K, "Ah-ha, I knew it all along: Differences in hindsight bias between insight and algebra problems", Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2002)
  5. Ash, I. K, "The nature of restructuring in insight: An individualdifferences approach", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), pp.66~73 (2006)
  6. Ash, I. K, "Hindsight bias in insight and mathematical problem solving: Evidence of different reconstruction mechanisms for metacognitive versus situational judgments", Memory & Cognition, 36(4), pp.822~837 (2008)
  7. Bowden, E. M, "Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems", Psychological Science, 9, pp.435~440 (1998)
  8. Burnham, C. A, "The nine-dot problem: Beyond perceptual organization", Psychonomic Science, 17, pp.321~323 (1969)
  9. Chein, J. M., "Working memory and insight in the nine-dot problem", Memory & Cognition, 38(7), pp.883~892 (2010)
  10. Chi, M. T. H, "Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices", Cognitive science, 5(2), pp.121~152 (1981)
  11. Chronicle, E. P, "What makes an insight problem? The roles of heuristics, goal conception, and solution recoding in knowledge-lean problems", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), pp.14~ (2004)
  12. Chronicle, E. P, "When insight just won't come: The failure of visual cues in the nine-dot problem", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(3), pp.903~919 (2001)
  13. Cunningham, J. B, "Categories of insight and their correlates: An exploation of relationships among classic-type insight problems, rebus puzzles, remote associates and esoteric analogies", Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, pp.262~280 (2009)
  14. Dominowski, R. L, "Comment on “An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution several “insight” problems” by Weisberg and Alba", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), pp.193~198 (1981)
  15. Dreistadt, R, "The use of analogies and incubation in obtaining insights in creative problem solving", The journal of psychology, 71(2), pp.159~175 (1969)
  16. Duncker, K, "On problem-solving", Psychological Monographs, 58(5) (1945)
  17. Durso, F. T, "Graph-theoretic confirmation of restructuring during insight", Psychological Science, 5(2), pp.94~58 (1994)
  18. Ellen, P, "Direction, past experience, and hints in creative problem solving: reply to Weisberg and Alba", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(3), pp.316~325 (1982)
  19. Gick, M. L, "The Nature of insight", pp.197~228 (1995), MIT Press
  20. Humphrey, G, "Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology" (1963), Wiley
  21. Kaplan, C. A, "In search of insight", Cognitive Psychology, 22, pp.374~419 (1990)
  22. Kaufman. J. C, "Creativity: From potential to realization", pp.3~19 (2004), American Psychological Association
  23. Kershaw, T. C, "Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society", pp.489~493 (2001), Erlbaum
  24. Kershaw, T. C, "Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 30(1), pp.3~13 (2004)
  25. Lavric, A, "Differences in working memory involvement in analytical and creative tasks", Neuroreport : For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11, pp.1613~1618 (2000)
  26. Lung, C. T, "Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, pp.804~811 (1985)
  27. MacGregor, J. N, "). Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problem", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 27, pp.176~201 (2001)
  28. Maier, N. R. F, "Reasoning in humansⅠ. On direction", Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10(2), pp.115~143 (1930)
  29. Metcalfe, J, "Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(2), pp.288~ (1986)
  30. Metcalfe, J, "Premonitions of insight predict impending error", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, pp.623~634 (1987)
  31. Metcalfe, J, "Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving", Memory & Cognition, 15(3), pp.238~246 (1987)
  32. Ohlsson, S, "Advances in the psychology of thinking Vol. 1", pp.1~44 (1992), Harvester Wheatsheaf
  33. Ormerod, T. C, "Facilitation in variants of the nine-dot problem: perceptual or cognitive mediation", Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 19, pp.1005~ (1997)
  34. Parkhurst, H. B, "Confusion, lack of consensus, and the definition of creativity as a construct", Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, pp.1~21 (1999)
  35. Plucker, J. A, "Creativity: From potential to realization", pp.153~167 (2004), American Psychological Association
  36. Scheerer, M, "Problem-solving", Scientific American, 208(4), pp.118~128 (1963)
  37. Simonton, D. K, "Genius, creativity and leadership: Historiometric inquiries" (1984), Harvard University Press
  38. Sternberg, R. J, "The mind of the puzzler", Psychology Today, 16(6), pp.37~44 (1982)
  39. VanLehn, K, "Foundations of cognitive science", pp.527~580 (1989), MIT Press
  40. Weisberg, R. W, "The nature of insight", pp.157~196 (1995), MIT Press
  41. Weisberg, R. W, "Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts" (2006), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  42. Weisberg, R. W, "An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution several “insight” problems", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), pp.169~192 (1981)
  43. Weisberg, R. W, "Gestalt Theory, insight, and past experience: Reply to Dominowski", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), pp.199~203 (1981)
  44. Weisberg, R. W, "Problem solving is not like perception : more on gestalt theory", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 111(3), pp.326~330 (1982)
  45. Wertheimer, M, "Productive thinking(Enlarged ed.)" (1959), Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc

관련 논문AI추천

통찰 발생과정에 있어 막다른 골목과 재구조화의 기능에 대한 고찰이경민한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2016 · 제16권 제3호신형태주의 관점에 기초한 통찰 연구 실험에 있어 지각 변인과 전략 변인의 혼재 가능성에 대한 검증임웅, 민경미한국영재교육학회 · 영재와 영재교육2012 · 제11권 제3호통찰의 발현 기제에 대한 신형태주의 관점의 타당성 고찰임웅한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2012 · 제12권 제3호표적문제 변형의 유추추론을 통한통찰 발생 가능성 검증강현민, 윤지영한국영재교육학회 · 영재와 영재교육2016 · 제15권 제4호통찰의 재구조화 측정을 위한 이론적 탐색한윤영한국영재교육학회 · 영재와 영재교육2014 · 제13권 제2호통찰! 지각인가 혹은 지식인가? :인지의 하향처리과정으로서의 통찰임웅한국영재교육학회 · 영재와 영재교육2009 · 제8권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

대학교양교육에서의 창의성 교육의 방향최인수, 이화선pp. 1-17대학 수업에서 팀 공유정신모형은 어떻게 팀 효과성에 영향을 미치는가? 상호 신뢰의 매개를 중심으로전명남pp. 19-40초등학생의 창의성 발달 경향성 분석: 확산적 사고, 창의적 인성, 창의적 효능감을 중심으로김해성, 한기순pp. 55-74유아의 행복에 대한 인식 연구전경원, 조현서pp. 75-92
원문 보기