초등학교 토론 대회에 대한 사례 연구
A Case Study on “Debating Contest in Elementary School Education”
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper which is a kind of case study and qualitative research is to get the insight about “Debating Contest in Elementary school education.” For the purpose, I tried to interpret and describe the meaning of Debating Contest with several data which are collected by having an active interview with teachers, bringing some documents from ‘Elementary school Debating Council of S-city(EDCS)’ and conducting a questionnaire survey of school children. ‘S-city Elementary Schoolchild Debating Contest’, which is operated under the autonomous study group of teachers, has a significance from the point of view of appraising the debating competence of student and giving a practical experience of debating. Teachers who are members of EDCS feel worth hosting the debating contest. Students who participate in the contest are be contented with practical experience of debating. However there are some problems indicated by teacher as a participant in the process of debating contest. Firstly it would be help only some gifted students. Secondly it can be possible one-sided judgment in the estimation and criterion of debating. Despite these problems, the participants who are teachers and students of debating contest are satisfied with this experience. It has remarkable educational value as a practical debating with being considerate of others‘ feelings.
Abstract
The aim of this paper which is a kind of case study and qualitative research is to get the insight about “Debating Contest in Elementary school education.” For the purpose, I tried to interpret and describe the meaning of Debating Contest with several data which are collected by having an active interview with teachers, bringing some documents from ‘Elementary school Debating Council of S-city(EDCS)’ and conducting a questionnaire survey of school children. ‘S-city Elementary Schoolchild Debating Contest’, which is operated under the autonomous study group of teachers, has a significance from the point of view of appraising the debating competence of student and giving a practical experience of debating. Teachers who are members of EDCS feel worth hosting the debating contest. Students who participate in the contest are be contented with practical experience of debating. However there are some problems indicated by teacher as a participant in the process of debating contest. Firstly it would be help only some gifted students. Secondly it can be possible one-sided judgment in the estimation and criterion of debating. Despite these problems, the participants who are teachers and students of debating contest are satisfied with this experience. It has remarkable educational value as a practical debating with being considerate of others‘ feelings.
참고문헌 (25)
- 권순희, "초등학생의 인성교육을 위한 말하기·듣기 교육 방안: 적극적 초등학생과 소극적 초등학생의 토론 대화 분석을 중심으로", 한국초등국어교육, (34), pp.35~90 (2007), 한국초등국어교육학회
- 권회경, "토론에서 논증 도식 사용에 따른 비판적 의문과 반박 제기 양상에 관한 연구—초등학교 6학년 소집단 토론을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2008
- 김병원, "토론학습에 의한 사고 기능의 변화", 등교육연구, 14(3), pp.157~174 (2001)
- 김윤옥, "상호주관성에 바탕을 둔 화법교육 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 김재봉, "초등 화법교육 연구의 현황과 방향(Ⅰ)", 한국초등국어교육, (39), pp.123~155 (2009), 한국초등국어교육학회
- 김혜선, "초등학생 설득 표현에 나타난 합리성 추구 양상 분석", 한국초등국어교육, (36), pp.171~192 (2008), 한국초등국어교육학회
- 서현석, "학생 소집단 대화의 ‘협의’ 양상-의사결정 과제를 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, (22), pp.159~186 (2005), 국어교육학회
- 서현석, "초등학교 토론 교육의 내용 체계 연구", 화법연구, (18), pp.73~102 (2011), 한국화법학회
- 서울특별시교육청, "독서․토론․논술을 통한 살아있는 수업 만들기", pp.12~ (2011), 초등독서․토론․논술 장학 자료
- 안재원, "수사학과 논리학(Logica)의 관계-Cicere(기원전 106-43년)의 입장을 중심으로", 인간연구, 31(9), pp.131~150 (2005), 인간학연구소
- 옥유미, "토론 교육 방법 연구—상호 교섭적 관점을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
- 미래 한국인의 핵심 역량 증진을 위한 초․중등학교 교육과정비전연구(Ⅰ)—핵심 역량 준거와 영역 설정을 중심으로, "윤현진", 한국 교육과정 평가원, ~, pp.RRC 2007-1 (2007)
- 미래 한국인의 핵심역량 증진을 위한 초․중등학교 교육과정 비전 연구(Ⅱ)—핵심역량 영역별 하위 요소 설정을 중심으로, "이광우", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRC 2008-7-1 (2008)
- 이은미, "초등학생의 토론 과정에 따른 자료 활용 양상 분석과 지도 방안 연구—6학년 학생의 소집단 토론 과정을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
- 이현림, "인간 발달과 교육" (2006), 교육과학사
- 이성범, "추론의 화용론" (2001), 한국문화사
- 정정문, "수사학적 토론교육", 석사, pp.2007
- 하병학, "토론과 설득을 위한 우리들의 논리" (2000), 철학과 현실사
- George J. Posner, "교육과정 설계의 이론과 실제：코스 설계자로서의 교사" (2006), 시그마프레스
- James A. Holstein, "적극 면담" (1995), 군자출판사
- OECD, "Definition and selection of competencies：Theoretical and conceptual foundation" (2003), OECD Press
- OECD, "Schooling for Tomorrow：Think Scenarios, Rethink Education" (2006), OECD
- Phillips, L., "Basic debate, Illinois" (1996), National Textbooks Company
- Toulmin, S. E., "The Uses of Argument, Cambridge" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Van Eemeren, F. H., "Fundamental of argumentation theory a handbook of historical background and contemporary developments" (1996), LE