본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의사소통교육으로서의 ‘토론대회’ 사례 연구 - 숙명여대 교육경험을 중심으로 -

A Case Study about “Debate Contest” in terms of Communication Education - Based upon Educating Experience in Sookmyung Women’s University

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Speech and debate class become one of important parts of university’s communication education. As a teaching-learning method, debate is highly regarded in terms of cultivating students’ abilities of self-initiated learning, critical thinking, and logical reasoning. Debate education can naturally promote students’ thinking and communication skills by invigorating the process of their reading, writing, listening, thinking, and talking. This research confirms following educational effects, examining one university’s debate contest case which is linked with “presentation and debate” class. Above all, this research finds out that the debate contest can offer students opportunities of cultivating their thoughtful thinking ability and developing their learning ability like searching, analyzing, and restructuring of data. Debate contest also becomes an actual place where students can form their critical mind and exercise their public speech by attracting them into real issues of community and society. Like this, the debate contest offers students an important educational opportunity of developing their communication ability. Through written interviews with students who were attending the debate contest, this research empirically confirms that students could gradually upgrade their communication ability, passing through phases like writing, interviewing, and real discussing, which are required in the preparation of the debate contest. Through the debate contest, students can develop their communication and leadership ability as well as learning ability, which is essential in the university, by the process of learning, collecting, organizing various fields’ knowledge and information that are related with discussion topics. In conclusion, besides debate education, combining communication education with an out of school activity like the debate contest is meaningful in terms of providing opportunities about students can express and share their thinking. In addition, this paper mentions that continuous coaching and/or the role of instructor are important in communication education, which is really helpful for students in the preparation of debate contest or after the contest, and also points out that an effort to expansion of debate education effects to the base is necessary by promoting mutual exchange among universities’ debate clubs. Through this case study, this research paper could find out an important educational implication that students can improve their intrinsic learning motive and boost their confidence by experiencing open and positive learning process through the debate contest.

Abstract

Speech and debate class become one of important parts of university’s communication education. As a teaching-learning method, debate is highly regarded in terms of cultivating students’ abilities of self-initiated learning, critical thinking, and logical reasoning. Debate education can naturally promote students’ thinking and communication skills by invigorating the process of their reading, writing, listening, thinking, and talking. This research confirms following educational effects, examining one university’s debate contest case which is linked with “presentation and debate” class. Above all, this research finds out that the debate contest can offer students opportunities of cultivating their thoughtful thinking ability and developing their learning ability like searching, analyzing, and restructuring of data. Debate contest also becomes an actual place where students can form their critical mind and exercise their public speech by attracting them into real issues of community and society. Like this, the debate contest offers students an important educational opportunity of developing their communication ability. Through written interviews with students who were attending the debate contest, this research empirically confirms that students could gradually upgrade their communication ability, passing through phases like writing, interviewing, and real discussing, which are required in the preparation of the debate contest. Through the debate contest, students can develop their communication and leadership ability as well as learning ability, which is essential in the university, by the process of learning, collecting, organizing various fields’ knowledge and information that are related with discussion topics. In conclusion, besides debate education, combining communication education with an out of school activity like the debate contest is meaningful in terms of providing opportunities about students can express and share their thinking. In addition, this paper mentions that continuous coaching and/or the role of instructor are important in communication education, which is really helpful for students in the preparation of debate contest or after the contest, and also points out that an effort to expansion of debate education effects to the base is necessary by promoting mutual exchange among universities’ debate clubs. Through this case study, this research paper could find out an important educational implication that students can improve their intrinsic learning motive and boost their confidence by experiencing open and positive learning process through the debate contest.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 강태완, "토론의 방법" (2001), 커뮤니케이션 북스
  2. 고재희, "통합적 접근의 교육방법 및 교육공학" (2008), 교육과학사
  3. 곽병선, "교육과정 및 교수학습 이론과 실제" (2009), 학지사
  4. 권영창, "효과적인 교수-학습을 위한 교육방법론" (2008), 형설출판사
  5. 김근곤, "교육과정의 이해" (2011), 학이당
  6. 도정일, "실천 인문학의 한 방법 - 사고와 표현은 왜 중요한가", 사고와표현학회 창립학술대회 발표논문집 (2007), 한국사고와표현학회
  7. 박승억, "토론과 논증" (2005), 형설출판사
  8. 박종훈, "방송 토론 듣기 능력의 신장을 위한 교수․학습 방안", 국어교육연구, 8(48), pp.89~114 (2011), 국어교육학회(since1969)
  9. 오상현, "칼 포퍼식 토론을 활용한 논술교수학습방안", 국어교육연구, 38, pp.103~128 (2005), 국어교육학회
  10. 이경화, "효과적인 교수-학습을 위한 교육심리학" (2009), 교육과학사
  11. 이상우, "협동학습으로 토의, 토론 달인 되기" (2011), 시그마 프레스
  12. 이상태, "정책명제의 분석과 논술문의 구조", 국어교육연구, 37, pp.201~212 (2005), 국어교육학회
  13. 이선영, "토론 대회 경험과 토론 효능감에 대한 연구-고등학교 토론 대회 소감문 분석을 중심으로-", 국어교육학연구, 40(39), pp.403~436 (2010), 국어교육학회
  14. 이성호, "교육과정 개발의 원리" (2004), 학지사
  15. 이정옥, "토론의 전략" (2008), 문학과 지성사
  16. 홍지호, "비판적 사고 -성숙한 이성으로의 길-" (2009), 성균관대학교출판부
  17. 이해명, "현대교육과정 및 평가" (2008), 교육아카데미
  18. 최웅환, "대학 교양교육으로서 <대학화법>의 방향성 모색", 국어교육연구, 36, pp.289~309 (2004), 국어교육학회
  19. 한승희, "평생교육론 - 평생학습사회의 교육학" (2006), 학지사
  20. 김선, "토론 - 수업을 위한 도구와 기법" (2008), 학이당
  21. Cialdini R.B.,, "설득의 기술" (2009), 21세기 북스
  22. 오형엽, "이성의 수사학" (2001), 고려대학교출판부
  23. Duffy Thomas M., "구성주의와 교육공학" (2003), 신호서적
  24. Freeley Austin J., "Argumentation and Debate", pp.22~30 (2000), Wadsworth
  25. Gardner Howard, "미래 마인드" (2008), 재인
  26. Gardner Howard, "통찰과 포용" (2007), 북스넛
  27. Handy Charles, "포트폴리오 인생" (2008), 에이지 21
  28. Palmer Parker. J, "가르칠 수 있는 용기" (2008), 한문화
  29. Wolfinger, Donna M., "통합교육과정의 이론과 실제" (2003), 양서원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)