‘착하다’의 의미 확장 양상과 의의
Aspects of Semantic Extension of ‘chakhata’ and Its Senses
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the aspects of semantic extension and senses of the adjective 'chakhata''. The main results are as follows. First, the basic definition of ‘chakhata’ refers to 'a person or attitude/behavior that is correct, right, and merciful.' When used with an inanimate object, it has affirmative aspects such as 'moral', 'behaving well', 'health-friendly', 'environment-friendly', 'learner-centered', ‘superior', 'economic', and 'aesthetic'. But when used about a person and an inanimate object, it can take on a negative aspect, such as 'depersonalized'. Second, the semantic extension of ‘chakhata'’ can be best captured by the usage-based model and explained by the semantic network and meaning chain model. The direction of semantic extension is: (i) ‘person→ animal→ plant→ inanimate object’ in the basic meaning category; and (ii) ‘behaving well’→ ’moral‘→ ’learner-centered‘→ ’health-friendly’→ ’environ- ment-friendly‘→ 'superior'→ ’economic‘→ ’aesthetic‘→ ’depersonalized’ in the extended meaning model. Semantic extension is peculiar in that various types form polysemous words, while their reception aspects differ according to generation. Oxymoronic collocation and negative meaning of ‘chakhan+noun’ are conspicuous. Lastly, because semantic extension of ‘chakhata’’ is very active and entrenched in terms of the extent and frequency of its usage, it is suggested that its polysemous senses and usage information should be listed in dictionaries.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the aspects of semantic extension and senses of the adjective 'chakhata''. The main results are as follows. First, the basic definition of ‘chakhata’ refers to 'a person or attitude/behavior that is correct, right, and merciful.' When used with an inanimate object, it has affirmative aspects such as 'moral', 'behaving well', 'health-friendly', 'environment-friendly', 'learner-centered', ‘superior', 'economic', and 'aesthetic'. But when used about a person and an inanimate object, it can take on a negative aspect, such as 'depersonalized'. Second, the semantic extension of ‘chakhata'’ can be best captured by the usage-based model and explained by the semantic network and meaning chain model. The direction of semantic extension is: (i) ‘person→ animal→ plant→ inanimate object’ in the basic meaning category; and (ii) ‘behaving well’→ ’moral‘→ ’learner-centered‘→ ’health-friendly’→ ’environ- ment-friendly‘→ 'superior'→ ’economic‘→ ’aesthetic‘→ ’depersonalized’ in the extended meaning model. Semantic extension is peculiar in that various types form polysemous words, while their reception aspects differ according to generation. Oxymoronic collocation and negative meaning of ‘chakhan+noun’ are conspicuous. Lastly, because semantic extension of ‘chakhata’’ is very active and entrenched in terms of the extent and frequency of its usage, it is suggested that its polysemous senses and usage information should be listed in dictionaries.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강범모, "형용사와 명사의 의미운율", 언어, 36(1), pp.1~23 (2011), 한국언어학회
- 김명광, "형용사 ‘착하-’의 구조 변화에 대한 일고찰", 언어와 문화, 5(3), pp.117~137 (2009), 한국언어문화교육학회
- 김영도, "선택제약 위반을 활용한 문화콘텐츠의 네이밍 창작", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(12), pp.164~172 (2010), 한국콘텐츠학회
- 김진해, "연어(連語) 연구" (2000), 한국문화사
- 김철규, "한국어 형용사 ‘착한’의 연어(collocation)에 관한 단기 통시적 고찰", 언어과학, 19(4), pp.65~87 (2012), 한국언어과학회
- 남길임, "어휘의 공기 경향성과 의미적 운율", 한글, (298), pp.135~164 (2012), 한글학회
- 은려려, "특이한 의미확장에 대한 연구", 중국조선어문, 183, pp.33~39 (2013), 길림성민족사무위원회
- 이정호, "모순어법에 대한 포스트모던적 조명", 人文論叢, 27, pp.21~33 (1992), 서울대학교 인문학연구원
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "신체화에 기초한 의미 확장의 특성 연구", 언어과학연구, (40), pp.1~31 (2007), 언어과학회
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "다의어의 판정과 의미 확장의 분류 기준", 한국어 의미학, 28, pp.193~226 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 조항범, "현대국어의 의미 변화에 대하여(2) -형용사, 동사를 중심으로-", 한국언어문학, (81), pp.85~112 (2012), 한국언어문학회[DOI]
- 임지룡, "언어학개론" (2003), 한국문화사
- Gibbs, R.W., "마음의 시학: 비유적 사고․언어․이해" (2003), 한국문화사
- Heine, B, "Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework" (1991), The University of Chicago Press
- 김철규, "The Metaphorical Meanings of the Korean Adjective chakhan in Korean Newspapers from 1990 to 2011", 담화와 인지, 20(3), pp.89~109 (2013), 담화·인지언어학회
- Langacker, R.W., "문법과 개념화" (2001), 박이정
- 임지룡, "의미론의 길잡이" (2013), 한국문화사
- Taylor, J.R., "Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory" (2003), Clarendon Press
