Implicatures of the Adjective Chakhata
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Joh, Yoon-kyoung & Choi, Youngju. (2017). Implicatures of the adjective chakhata. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(2), 43-60. Over two decades, the meaning of the adjective chakhata has been extended to the extent that it is compatible with inanimate objects, which was not imaginable before 1990. The phenomenon attracted many researchers' attention including Kim (2009), Cho (2012), Kim (2012, 2013) and Lim (2014). Their main contribution is the identification and categorization of the new nominal collocates of chakhata. They also reveal that the original meaning of chakhata, ‘good’ has extended to various meanings through metaphor. In doing so, Lim (2014) observes two more meanings than previous researchers, which are ‘superior or great’ and ‘not excellent or not great.’ He deals with them as basic meanings, along with the other meanings. However, we claim that the two meanings come from implicatures. The purpose of the paper is to show how an implicature-based account is better suited for strongly positive and negative meanings of the scalar words such as chakhata. (Mokpo National University and Chosun University).
Abstract
Joh, Yoon-kyoung & Choi, Youngju. (2017). Implicatures of the adjective chakhata. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(2), 43-60. Over two decades, the meaning of the adjective chakhata has been extended to the extent that it is compatible with inanimate objects, which was not imaginable before 1990. The phenomenon attracted many researchers' attention including Kim (2009), Cho (2012), Kim (2012, 2013) and Lim (2014). Their main contribution is the identification and categorization of the new nominal collocates of chakhata. They also reveal that the original meaning of chakhata, ‘good’ has extended to various meanings through metaphor. In doing so, Lim (2014) observes two more meanings than previous researchers, which are ‘superior or great’ and ‘not excellent or not great.’ He deals with them as basic meanings, along with the other meanings. However, we claim that the two meanings come from implicatures. The purpose of the paper is to show how an implicature-based account is better suited for strongly positive and negative meanings of the scalar words such as chakhata. (Mokpo National University and Chosun University).
참고문헌 (12)
- 김명광, "형용사 ‘착하-’의 구조 변화에 대한 일고찰", 언어와 문화, 5(3), pp.117~137 (2009), 한국언어문화교육학회
- 김철규, "한국어 형용사 ‘착한’의 연어(collocation)에 관한 단기 통시적 고찰", 언어과학, 19(4), pp.65~87 (2012), 한국언어과학회
- 조항범, "현대국어의 의미 변화에 대하여(2) －형용사, 동사를 중심으로－", 한국언어문학, (81), pp.85~112 (2012), 한국언어문학회
- Blome-Tillmann, M., "Conversational implicature and the cancellability test", Analysis, 68(2), pp.156~160 (2008)
- Carston, R., "Relevance theory: Applications and implications", pp.179~236 (1998), John Benjamins
- "Q and R principles: Lecture note of San Diego State University" (2016)[URL]
- Grice, P., "Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Horn, L., "Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity", Language, 61(1), pp.121~174 (1985)
- 김철규, "The Metaphorical Meanings of the Korean Adjective chakhan in Korean Newspapers from 1990 to 2011", 담화와 인지, 20(3), pp.89~109 (2013), 담화·인지언어학회
- 임지룡, "‘착하다’의 의미 확장 양상과 의의", 언어, 39(4), pp.971~996 (2014), 한국언어학회
- Matsumoto, Y., "The conversational condition on Horn scales", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18(1), pp.21~60 (1995)
- Voβhagen, C., "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.289~308 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company