Communication, Argumentation and Relevance
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to argue that a theory of argumentation can be incorporated into a theory of communication (i.e. Relevance Theory). Whereas argumentation is the process of justifying something in an organized or a logical way, which is composed of one or more claims and shows one or more grounds for maintaining them, communication is sharing communicators’ intentions. A speaker’s conveying of his intention to hearer is to create an effect in the hearer’s mind. Two pragmatic theories, Relevance Theory (henceforth RT) and argumentation theory (henceforth AT) are involved in this approach, which is based on the position that communication is always accompanied with argumentation. However, RT has been more focused on explaining how the utterance is interpreted by the hearer, not how argumentation is performed. For this reason, this approach presented here argues for the needs to extend the scope of RT’s application. This integrated approach within a single principle of relevance ultimately contributes to pursuing a more economic and coherent explanation of argumentation.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to argue that a theory of argumentation can be incorporated into a theory of communication (i.e. Relevance Theory). Whereas argumentation is the process of justifying something in an organized or a logical way, which is composed of one or more claims and shows one or more grounds for maintaining them, communication is sharing communicators’ intentions. A speaker’s conveying of his intention to hearer is to create an effect in the hearer’s mind. Two pragmatic theories, Relevance Theory (henceforth RT) and argumentation theory (henceforth AT) are involved in this approach, which is based on the position that communication is always accompanied with argumentation. However, RT has been more focused on explaining how the utterance is interpreted by the hearer, not how argumentation is performed. For this reason, this approach presented here argues for the needs to extend the scope of RT’s application. This integrated approach within a single principle of relevance ultimately contributes to pursuing a more economic and coherent explanation of argumentation.
참고문헌 (37)
- Allan, Keith, "Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy", Springer
- Amossy, Ruth, "L’argumentation dans le discours: discours politique, littérature d’idées, fiction" (2000), Les Édition Nathan
- Anscombre, Jean C., "Théorie des topoï" (1995), Les Édition Kimé
- Bakhtin, Mikhail, "Rabelais and His World" (1984), Indiana University Press
- Carston, Robyn, "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.633~656 (2006), Blackwell
- Dascal, Marcelo, "The Marriage of Pragmatics and rhetoric", Philosophy and Rhetoric, 32(2), pp.107~130 (1999)
- Dendale, Patrick, "Three linguistic theories of polyphony", dialogism: an external point of view and comparison, 2006, pp.5, 3~32
- Ducrot, Oswald, "Le dire et le dit" (1984), Les Éditions de Minuit
- Genette, Gerard, "Fiction and Diction" (1993), Cornell University Press
- Grice, Herbert Paul, "Meaning", Philosophical Review, 66, pp.377~388 (1957)
- Gumperz, John, "Mutualities in Dialogue", pp.101~123 (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Habermas, Jürgen, "The Theory of communicative Action" (1984), Beacon Press
- Hong, Jong-Hwa, "Nonjeung-gwa topoi", Bul-eo bulmunhak yeongu, 54, pp.837~859 (2000)
- Hovland, Carl, "Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change" (1953), Yale University Press
- Iten, Corrine, "The Relevance of Argumentation Theory", Lingua, 110, pp.665~699 (2000)
- Kim, Dae-Young, "Argumentation by Figurative Language in Verbal Communication: A Pragmatic Approach", 박사, pp.2013
- 김대영, "OK. Please Show Me Your Marilyn Monroe Now: An Analysis of Metaphorical Irony", 담화와 인지, 20(2), pp.21~47 (2013), 담화·인지언어학회
- Kreckel, Marga, "Communicative Acts and Shared Knowledge in Natural Discourse" (1981), Academic Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
- Lee, B.P.H., "Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.21~44 (2001)
- Lewis, David, "Convention: A Philosophical Study" (1969), Harvard University Presss
- Mercier, Hugo, "Why do human reason?: Arguments for an Argumentative Theory", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, pp.57~111 (2011)
- Perelman, Chaïm, "L’empire rhétorique" (1977), Vrin
- Perelman, Chaïm, "Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique" (1958), Édition de l’Université de Bruxells
- Plantin, Christian, "L’argumentation" (1996), Seuil
- Plato; A New Translation, "The Republic", pp.1985, Plato
- Prince, Gerald, "A Dictionary of Narratology" (2003), University of Nebraska Press
- Schiffer, Stephen, "Meaning", pp.76~116 (1972), Oxford University Press
- 송병우, "설득 담화 속의 개념적 은유", 국어국문학, (150), pp.5~28 (2008), 국어국문학회
- Sperber, Dan, "Mutual Knowledge", pp.61~85 (1982), Academic Press
- Sperber, Dan, "The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice", pp.140~155 (1990), Stanford University Press
- Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
- Sperber, Dan, "Collective Wisodom: Principles and Mechanisms", pp.368~392 (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Common Ground", Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, pp.701~721 (2002)
- Toulmin, Stephen, "The Uses of Argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Van Eemeren, "Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective" (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Van Eemeren, "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: the Pragma-Dialectical Approach" (2004), Cambridge University Press