Bound Noun swu in Korean: a Reply to Lee (2017, 2018)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kim, Tae Sik. 2020. Bound noun swu in Korean: a Reply to Lee (2017, 2018). Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-3, 515-535. This paper defends an analysis of a bound noun swu in Korean provided in Kim (2014). The bound noun swu in Korean is ambiguous between Root Modality (RM) and Epistemic Modality (EM) (Ha 2007). Recently, Lee (2017, 2018) criticizes Kim (2014): we find an argument transfer operation (Grimshaw and Mester 1988) only in RM but not in EM; Kim (2014) cannot account for data when an NPI occupies an object position; Swu + eps with the EM reading is problematic. However, the argument transfer operation, which is assumed to be only in RM, is not a problem at all, since we have two different structures for the bound noun swu. Also, Kim (2014) can easily account for an NPI in an object position. The unavailability of the EM reading with swu + eps can be attributed to subcategorization framework, Phonology or a PPI/NPI distinction. Rather, Lee (2017, 2018) suffers from several problems. Her tensed/untensed distinction with RM and EM is not tenable due to problematic data, and the grammaticalized nature of the bound noun swu cannot be explained. Furthermore, Lee (2017, 2018) cannot capture a theta-role relationship between a subject and an embedded predicate in the case of RM. Lee (2017, 2018) also assumes unnecessary lexical entries, which begs additional motivation. (Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
Abstract
Kim, Tae Sik. 2020. Bound noun swu in Korean: a Reply to Lee (2017, 2018). Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-3, 515-535. This paper defends an analysis of a bound noun swu in Korean provided in Kim (2014). The bound noun swu in Korean is ambiguous between Root Modality (RM) and Epistemic Modality (EM) (Ha 2007). Recently, Lee (2017, 2018) criticizes Kim (2014): we find an argument transfer operation (Grimshaw and Mester 1988) only in RM but not in EM; Kim (2014) cannot account for data when an NPI occupies an object position; Swu + eps with the EM reading is problematic. However, the argument transfer operation, which is assumed to be only in RM, is not a problem at all, since we have two different structures for the bound noun swu. Also, Kim (2014) can easily account for an NPI in an object position. The unavailability of the EM reading with swu + eps can be attributed to subcategorization framework, Phonology or a PPI/NPI distinction. Rather, Lee (2017, 2018) suffers from several problems. Her tensed/untensed distinction with RM and EM is not tenable due to problematic data, and the grammaticalized nature of the bound noun swu cannot be explained. Furthermore, Lee (2017, 2018) cannot capture a theta-role relationship between a subject and an embedded predicate in the case of RM. Lee (2017, 2018) also assumes unnecessary lexical entries, which begs additional motivation. (Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
참고문헌 (28)
- Abe, Y, "Proceedings of the 1992 Asian Conference on Language, Information and Computation", pp.132~144 (1992), Thayhaksa
- Ahn, H, "A study on bound nouns in Present-Day Korean" (2001), Youkrack Publishing
- 최현숙, "연어 ”-을 수 {있", 없}-”의 서법성과 중의성에 대하여, 2020, pp.30(1), 31~61[DOI]
- 정대호, "Korean Modal V-(u)l swu", li iss, 생성문법연구, pp.2007, 17(4)[DOI]
- 정대호, "On Polarity Licensing in the -ul swu iss Construction", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.457~484 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Grimshaw, J, "Light verbs and Θ–marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
- Ha, I, "NPI Licensing in Korean Modal Constructions", Japanese, 2007, pp.15, 312~323
- Hornstein, N, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Kim, T, "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Doctor, pp.2011
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.385~406 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun cis in Korean", 생성문법연구, 26(2), pp.239~256 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean, a Nominative Complex Noun Phrase or a Grammaticalized Noun: A Reply to Tchoe (2015)", 생성문법연구, 26(4), pp.407~425 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun man in Korean", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.81~106 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun tongan in Korean", 생성문법연구, 27(2), pp.367~394 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "The Relationship between Semantic Bleaching and Syntax: A Case from Bound Noun cwung in Korean", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.565~589 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean, from a Perspective of Grammaticalization: A Reply to Chung (2017)", 생성문법연구, 28(1), pp.69~90 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun twung in Korean", 생성문법연구, 30(2), pp.197~219 (2020), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Kratzer, A, "Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics", pp.38~74 (1981), Mouton de Gruyter
- Kratzer, A, "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer
- 이정미, "Epistemic vs. Root Modality in Interactions with Tense", 언어, 42(4), pp.805~825 (2017), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 이정미, "Korean modal sentences and their interactions with NPIs", 언어, 43(2), pp.329~352 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Palmer, F. R, "Mood and modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Roberts, I, "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Saito, M, "Non-Nominative Subjects", pp.103~118 (2004), John Benjamins
- Sohn, K, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
- 최준수, "“∼ㄹ", 을 수(가) 있다”: 우리말 관형절이 있는 주격 복합명사구, 2015, pp.25(1), 81~108[DOI]
- van Gelderen, E, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins