Bound Noun swu in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
20
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Across languages, modal constructions are often ambiguous. It has beenobserved by Ha (2007) that a modal expression swu ‘way/possibility’ +iss ‘exist’ (‘CAN’) in Korean can be ambiguous between Root Modalityand Epistemic Modality. In this paper, I argue that the distinctionbetween Root Modality and Epistemic Modality lies in an adnominal Tthat bound noun swu takes and theta-role assigning capability of small nwith the bound noun: specifically, in the case of Root Modality, theadnominal T takes VP (but not vP) without an external argument, and abound noun assigns a theta-role to the external argument. On the otherhand, in the case of Epistemic Modality, the adnominal T takes vP withan external argument, and a bound noun does not assign a theta-role.
Abstract
Across languages, modal constructions are often ambiguous. It has beenobserved by Ha (2007) that a modal expression swu ‘way/possibility’ +iss ‘exist’ (‘CAN’) in Korean can be ambiguous between Root Modalityand Epistemic Modality. In this paper, I argue that the distinctionbetween Root Modality and Epistemic Modality lies in an adnominal Tthat bound noun swu takes and theta-role assigning capability of small nwith the bound noun: specifically, in the case of Root Modality, theadnominal T takes VP (but not vP) without an external argument, and abound noun assigns a theta-role to the external argument. On the otherhand, in the case of Epistemic Modality, the adnominal T takes vP withan external argument, and a bound noun does not assign a theta-role.
참고문헌 (19)
- Abe, Y., "Dethematized Subjects and Property Ascription in Japanese", Proceedings of the 1992 Asian Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp.132~144 (1992), Thayhaksa
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- 정대호, "Korean Modal V-(u)l swu", li iss, 생성문법연구, pp.2007, 17(4)[DOI]
- Grimshaw, J., "Light verbs and Θ–marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1998)
- Korean Linguistics, 15, "Japanese", pp.2007, Ha, I.
- Hiraiwa, K., "Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 40, pp.67~80 (2001)
- Hornstein, N., "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Ishizuka, T., "CNPC violations and possessor raising in Japanese", Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on East Asian Linguistics (ICEAL 2) (2009)
- Kim, T., "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", 박사, pp.2011
- Kratzer, A., "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluw
- WonbinLee, "Is Scrambling EPP-driven?", 생성문법연구, 13(2), pp.331~341 (2003), 한국생성문법학회
- Miyagawa, S., "The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity", pp.181~220 (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Saito, M., "Non-Nominative Subjects", pp.103~118 (2004), John Benjamins
- Saito, M., "Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects", pp.143~163 (2004), Kluwer
- Sohn, K., "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
- Tsujioka, T, "The Syntax of Possession in Japanese", 박사, pp.2002
- Woolford, E, "New perspectives on case theory", pp.299~327 (2003), Center for the Study of Language and Information