본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Bound Noun swu in Korean, a Nominative Complex Noun Phrase or a Grammaticalized Noun: A Reply to Tchoe (2015)

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper is against Tchoe’s (2015) analysis of the bound noun swu in Korean as a nominative complex noun phrase, and defends a grammaticalization-based analysis in Kim (2014). Tchoe’s (2015) argument that there are ambiguous readings (i.e., an existential reading and a possessive reading) with regard to the bound noun swu does not seem to be related to the number of subjects in a sentence unlike his claim. Also, Tchoe’s (2015) observation that the existential reading disappears in a relativized structure seems to be problematic with additional data. Lastly, Kim’s (2014) analysis is superior in that not only does it explain the behaviors of the bound noun swu, but it also can be extended to other bound nouns (i.e., Kim (2014) provides theoretical uniformity with other bound nouns).

Abstract

This paper is against Tchoe’s (2015) analysis of the bound noun swu in Korean as a nominative complex noun phrase, and defends a grammaticalization-based analysis in Kim (2014). Tchoe’s (2015) argument that there are ambiguous readings (i.e., an existential reading and a possessive reading) with regard to the bound noun swu does not seem to be related to the number of subjects in a sentence unlike his claim. Also, Tchoe’s (2015) observation that the existential reading disappears in a relativized structure seems to be problematic with additional data. Lastly, Kim’s (2014) analysis is superior in that not only does it explain the behaviors of the bound noun swu, but it also can be extended to other bound nouns (i.e., Kim (2014) provides theoretical uniformity with other bound nouns).

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Abe, Yasuaki., "Dethematized Subjects and Property Ascription in Japanese", Proceedings of the 1992 Asian Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp.132~144 (1992), Thayhaksa
  2. 최기용, "한국어 균열 구문의 ‘것’: 빈 NP 채우기로서의 ‘것’", 생성문법연구, 21(1), pp.21~47 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
  3. 정대호, "Korean Modal V-(u)l swu", li iss, 생성문법연구, pp.2007, 17(4)[DOI]
  4. Grimshaw, Jane, "Light verbs and Θ–marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
  5. Ha, Iljoo., "NPI Licensing in Korean Modal Constructions", Japanese, 2007, pp.15, 312~323
  6. Hopper, Paul J., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  7. Hornstein, Norbert., "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
  8. Kim, Tae Sik., "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Doctor, pp.2011
  9. 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.385~406 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
  10. 김태식, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  11. 김태식, "Bound Noun cis in Korean", 생성문법연구, 26(2), pp.239~256 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  12. Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  13. Saito, Mamoru, "Non-Nominative Subjects", pp.103~118 (2004), John Benjamins
  14. Sohn, Keun-Won., "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
  15. 최준수, "“∼ㄹ", 을 수(가) 있다”: 우리말 관형절이 있는 주격 복합명사구, 2015, pp.25(1), 81~108[DOI]
  16. 윤항진, "Different Types of Kes Constructions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 22(3), pp.557~577 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)