Bound Noun swu in Korean: A Reply to Park (2022)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses Park‘s (2022) criticism of Kim (2014) and her own proposal with the modal construction of a bound noun swu. Park (2022) points out that Kim (2014) has a problem with a past tense morpheme -ess. However, the -ess suffix is not a true past tense marker in the bound noun swu construction, and so does not pose a challenge for Kim (2014). Park (2022) proposes that swu and iss merge in Mod as one unit, but her approach has some non-trivial problems: there is no position reserved for adnominal T; grammatical/pragmatic markers can surface between swu and iss, which sugguests swu and iss do not form one unit; some part of the swu iss unit can be deleted, which violates the standard assumption that ellpisis targets a constituent. In addition to these problems, Kim (2014) has more explanatory power than Park (2022) in terms of grammaticalization.
Abstract
This paper discusses Park‘s (2022) criticism of Kim (2014) and her own proposal with the modal construction of a bound noun swu. Park (2022) points out that Kim (2014) has a problem with a past tense morpheme -ess. However, the -ess suffix is not a true past tense marker in the bound noun swu construction, and so does not pose a challenge for Kim (2014). Park (2022) proposes that swu and iss merge in Mod as one unit, but her approach has some non-trivial problems: there is no position reserved for adnominal T; grammatical/pragmatic markers can surface between swu and iss, which sugguests swu and iss do not form one unit; some part of the swu iss unit can be deleted, which violates the standard assumption that ellpisis targets a constituent. In addition to these problems, Kim (2014) has more explanatory power than Park (2022) in terms of grammaticalization.
참고문헌 (31)
- Abe, Yasuaki, "Dethematized subjects and property ascription in Japanese", Proceedings of the 1992 Asian Conference on Lnaguage, Information and Computation, pp.132~144 (1992), Thayhaksa
- Ahn, Hyo-Kyung, "Hyentaykwukeuy Uyconmyengsa Yenkwu (A Study on Bound Nouns in Present-Day Korean)" (2001), Youkrack Publishing
- 최현숙, "연어 ”-을 수 {있", 없}-”의 서법성과 중의성에 대하여, 2020, pp.30(1), 31~61[DOI]
- 정대호, "Korean Modal V-(u)l swu", li iss, 생성문법연구, pp.2007, 17(4)[DOI]
- 정대호, "On Polarity Licensing in the -ul swu iss Construction", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.457~484 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Cinque, Guglielmo, "Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Light verbs and Θ–marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
- Ha, Iljoo, "NPI Licensing in Korean modal constructions", Japanese, 2007, pp.15, 312~323
- Hornstein, Nobert, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Kim, Tae Sik, "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Doctor, pp.2011
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.385~406 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun cis in Korean", 생성문법연구, 26(2), pp.239~256 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean, a Nominative Complex Noun Phrase or a Grammaticalized Noun: A Reply to Tchoe (2015)", 생성문법연구, 26(4), pp.407~425 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun man in Korean", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.81~106 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun tongan in Korean", 생성문법연구, 27(2), pp.367~394 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "The Relationship between Semantic Bleaching and Syntax: A Case from Bound Noun cwung in Korean", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.565~589 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean, from a Perspective of Grammaticalization: A Reply to Chung (2017)", 생성문법연구, 28(1), pp.69~90 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun twung in Korean", 생성문법연구, 30(2), pp.197~219 (2020), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean: a Reply to Lee (2017, 2018)", 언어, 45(3), pp.515~535 (2020), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun cwul in Korean", 생성문법연구, 31(4), pp.537~556 (2021), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 이정미, "Epistemic vs. Root Modality in Interactions with Tense", 언어, 42(4), pp.805~825 (2017), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 이정미, "Korean modal sentences and their interactions with NPIs", 언어, 43(2), pp.329~352 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 남길임, "‘-ㄹ 수 없-’의 의미와 담화 기능에 대한 말뭉치언어학적 분석", 텍스트언어학, 38, pp.93~120 (2015), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 박소영, "‘-을 수 있다’ 양태구문의 통사구조와 부정극어 인허", 생성문법연구, 32(1), pp.75~96 (2022), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Saito, Mamoru, "Non-Nominative Subjects", pp.103~118 (2004), John Benjamins
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
- 최준수, "“∼ㄹ", 을 수(가) 있다”: 우리말 관형절이 있는 주격 복합명사구, 2015, pp.25(1), 81~108[DOI]
- van Gelderen, Elly, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins
- Yule, George, "Explaining English Grammar" (1998), Oxford University Press