한국어 종결어미 ‘-네'와 단언화행
The Korean Sentence-Final Suffix –ney and the Assertive Speech Act
2
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper shows that the Korean sentence-final suffix –ney should not be treated as an epistemic modal like the English modal must, nor as an evidential or mirative. Instead, the paper argues that, like the declarative suffix –ta, –ney should be a sentence mood that basically expresses an assertive speech act, and that the difference between the two is that –ta is a sentence mood that requires that the described proposition be‘informative to the hearer', whereas -ney is a mood that requires that the proposition be‘informative to the speaker'. Thus the proposed analysis suggests that the assertive speech act can be at least two subtypes, the assertion for informativeness and the assertion for the speaker's own knowledge.
Abstract
This paper shows that the Korean sentence-final suffix –ney should not be treated as an epistemic modal like the English modal must, nor as an evidential or mirative. Instead, the paper argues that, like the declarative suffix –ta, –ney should be a sentence mood that basically expresses an assertive speech act, and that the difference between the two is that –ta is a sentence mood that requires that the described proposition be‘informative to the hearer', whereas -ney is a mood that requires that the proposition be‘informative to the speaker'. Thus the proposed analysis suggests that the assertive speech act can be at least two subtypes, the assertion for informativeness and the assertion for the speaker's own knowledge.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김차균, "국어 시제 형태소의 의미", 한글, 169, pp.45~116 (1980)
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- 박재연, "현대국어 반말체 종결어미 연구", 국어연구, 158 (1998)
- 박재연, "국어 양태범주의 확립과 어미의 의미 기술: 인식양태를 중심으로", 국어학, 34, pp.199~225 (1999)
- 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미의 의미 연구" (2006), 태학사
- 박재연, "한국어의 인식론적 범주와 관련한 몇 문제", 國語學, (66), pp.79~108 (2013), 국어학회
- 권익수, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’의 의미 재고찰: 정경숙(2012)에 대한 다른 생각", 언어, 38(1), pp.53~66 (2013), 한국언어학회
- 임동훈, "한국어의 서법과 양태 체계", 한국어 의미학, 26, pp.211~248 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 임동훈, "체계적인, 너무나 체계적인- 박재연(2006)을 중심으로 -", 형태론, 13(1), pp.107~123 (2011), 형태론
- 장경희, "현대국어의 양태범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 정경숙, "한국어 종결어미 '-네'의 의미: 증거성 및 의외성과 관련해서", 언어, 37(4), pp.995~1016 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 최순자, "Modality in grammar and discourse", pp.165~204 (1995), J. Benjamins
- De Haan, F., "Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting Boundaries", Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, pp.83~101 (1999)
- DeLancey, Scott, "The Mirative and Evidentiality", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.369~382 (2001)
- Dummett. Michael, "The Seas of Language", pp.202~2232 (1993), Clarendon Press
- Grice, H. Paul, "The Philosophy of Language", pp.171~181 (1975), Oxford University Press
- Huang, Yan, "Pragmatics" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Lee, Chungmin, "Harvard Studies in Korean linguistics", pp.41~56 (1993), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Lee, Hyo-Sang, "Cognitive Constraints on Expressing Newly Perceived Information: with Reference to Epistemic Modal Suffixes in Korean", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.135~167 (1993)
- Lee, Kee-Dong, "A Korean Grammar on Semantic-Pragmatic Principles" (1993), Hankook Mwunhwasa
- Levinson, "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Eun-JuNoh, "The Korean Sentence-Ending Suffix ney:Epistemicity vs. Cognitive Effects", 언어, 27(4), pp.581~599 (2002), 한국언어학회
- Song, Jae-Mog, "Evidentiality in Korean. Modals and Evidentials in Korean", 2011 J-K Preconference Workshop (2011), Seoul National University
- Portner, Paul, "Modality" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Searle, John. R., "The Philosophy of Language", pp.146~156 (1969), Oxford University Press
- Searle, John. R., "The Philosophy of Language", pp.182~195 (1975), Oxford University Press
- Searle, John. R., "Foundations of Illocutionary Logic" (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Strauss, Susan, "Cognitive Realization Markers in Korean: A Discourse-Pragmatic Study of the Sentence-Ending Particles -kwun, -ney and –tela", Language Sciences, 27, pp.437~480 (2005)
- Vanderveken, Daniel, "Meaning and speech act vol.1: principles of language use" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- von Fintel, Kai, "Must... Stay... Strong!", Natural Language Semantics, 18, pp.351~383 (2010)