한국어 종결어미 '-네'의 의미: 증거성 및 의외성과 관련해서
The Semantics of the Korean Sentence-Final Suffix -ney: in Relation to Evidentiality and Mirativity
2
조회
0
다운로드
39
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean sentence-final suffix–ney has been analyzed as an epistemic modal, an evidential, or a mirative. This paper claims that -ney is not an epistemic modal nor an evidential although it closely relates to evidentiality in that it indicates that the speaker serves as the acquirer of the evidence for a given proposition at the utterance time. Instead it is argued that -ney should be analyzed as a mirative because it indicates that the expressed proposition is new or unexpected and thus unassimilated to the speaker’s existing knowledge. Furthermore, it is argued that this mirative meaning is not sufficient to account for -ney because it requires that the speaker should be involved in the proposition objectively. The paper concludes that -ney has three meaning components:(i) evidence acquisition, (ii) new and unassimilated information, and (iii) objectification of the speaker.
Abstract
The Korean sentence-final suffix–ney has been analyzed as an epistemic modal, an evidential, or a mirative. This paper claims that -ney is not an epistemic modal nor an evidential although it closely relates to evidentiality in that it indicates that the speaker serves as the acquirer of the evidence for a given proposition at the utterance time. Instead it is argued that -ney should be analyzed as a mirative because it indicates that the expressed proposition is new or unexpected and thus unassimilated to the speaker’s existing knowledge. Furthermore, it is argued that this mirative meaning is not sufficient to account for -ney because it requires that the speaker should be involved in the proposition objectively. The paper concludes that -ney has three meaning components:(i) evidence acquisition, (ii) new and unassimilated information, and (iii) objectification of the speaker.
참고문헌 (33)
- 남기심, "표준 국어 문법론 (제3판)" (2012), 탑출판사
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- 송재목, "증거성(evidentiality)과 주어제약의 유형론-한국어, 몽골어, 티벳어를 예로 들어-", 형태론, 9(1), pp.1~23 (2007), 형태론
- Aikhenvald, A. Y., "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Bybee, Joan, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Chafe, Wallace L., "Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing, In Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology", pp.261~272 (1986), Ablex Publishing Corporation
- Choi, Soon-Ja, "The Development of Epistemic Sentence-Ending Modal Forms and Functions in Korean Children, In Modality in Grammar and Discourse", pp.165~204 (1995), John Benjamins
- Chung, Kyung-Sook, "Spatial Deictic Tense and Evidentials in Ko", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.187~219 (2007)
- Chung, Kyung-Sook, "Korean Evidentials and Assertion", Lingua, (120), pp.932~952 (2010)
- Chung, Kyung-Sook, "Space In Tense: The Interaction of Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality and Speech Acts in Korean" (2012), John Benjamines
- Cinque, Guglielmo, "Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective" (1997), Oxford University Press
- De Haan, F., "Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting boundaries", Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, pp.83~101 (1999)
- Izvorski, Roumyana, "The Present Perfect as an epistemic modal", Proceedings from SALT 7 (1997), CLSI
- DeLancey, Scott, "Evidentiality and Volitionality in Tibetan, In Evidentiality: The linguistic Coding of Epistemology", pp.203~213 (1986), Ablex Publishing Corporation
- DeLancey, Scott, "Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information", Linguistic Typology, 1, pp.33~52 (1997)
- DeLancey, Scott, "The Mirative and Evidentiality", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.369~382 (2001)
- Givon, Talmy, "Syntax: An introduction" (2001), Benjamins
- Lazard, Gilbert, "ativity, Evidentiality, and Mediativity, or other?", Linguistic Typology, 3, pp.91~109 (1999)
- Lee, Chungmin, "The Acquisition of Mood Indicators in Korean, In Harvard Studies in Korean linguistics vol.5", pp.41~56 (1993), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Lee, Hyo-Sang, "Cognitive Constraints on Expressing Newly Perceived Information: with Reference to Epistemic Modal Suffixes in Korean", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.135~167 (1993)
- Lee, Jungmi, "Evidentiality and Temporality: A Case Study of -te in Korean", Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 8, pp.287~311 (2011)
- Lee, Kee-Dong, "A Korean Grammar on Semantic-Pragmatic Principles" (1993), Hankook Mwunhwasa
- Matthewson, Lisa, "When Fieldwork Meets Theory: Evidence About Evidentials", Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence
- Eun-JuNoh, "The Korean Sentence-Ending Suffix ney:Epistemicity vs. Cognitive Effects", 언어, 27(4), pp.581~599 (2002), 한국언어학회
- 노은주, "A Pragmatic Account of the Korean Sentence-Final Particle ney", 담화와 인지, 10(2), pp.53~74 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
- Palmer, Frank. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "Korean" (1994), Routledge
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Jae-MogSong, "A Typological Analysis of the Korean Evidential Marker -te-", 언어학, 32, pp.149~166 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- Song, Jae-Mog, "Evidentiality in Korean. Modals and Evidentials in Korean", 2011 J-K Preconference Workshop (2011)
- Strauss, Susan, "Cognitive Realization Markers in Korean: A Discourse-Pragmatic Study of the Sentence-Ending Particles -kwun, -ney and –tela", Language Sciences, 27, pp.437~480 (2005)
- von Fintel, Kai, "Must... Stay... Strong!", Natural Language Semantics, 18, pp.351~383 (2010)
- Willett, Thomas, "A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality", Studies in Language, 12, pp.51~97 (1988)