종결어미의 메타화용론적 기능: ‘-지/-단다’와 ‘-네/-구나’를 중심으로
The Metapragmatic Function of Korean Verbal Suffixes: Focused on ‘-ci/-tanta’ and ‘-ney/-kuna’
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzes the function of Korean verbal suffixes from the perspective of metapragmatics. A sentence has metapragmatic information, which is the information about pragmatics, in addition to syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic information. The metapragmatic information of verbal suffixes include information on the informational state of the proposition and the speaker’s emotional information for the proposition. In this paper, it is first seen that the suffixes ‘-ci/-tanta’ and ‘-ney/-kuna’ differ in their informational state such as new and old information, based on previous studies, and the differences are reflected in the information state of Common Ground. Next, the study analyzed the function of the verbal suffixes within the dialogue model of Ginzburg(2012), which can describe the change of Common Ground in each participant of discourse. As a result, the study can understand the differences of the verbal suffixes from the metapragmatic viewpoint beyond semantics or pragmatics. This work contrasts the previous studies that deal with the differences of the verbal suffixes by means of the unrelated semantic or pragmatic concepts such as verum focus, evidentiality, mirativity.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the function of Korean verbal suffixes from the perspective of metapragmatics. A sentence has metapragmatic information, which is the information about pragmatics, in addition to syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic information. The metapragmatic information of verbal suffixes include information on the informational state of the proposition and the speaker’s emotional information for the proposition. In this paper, it is first seen that the suffixes ‘-ci/-tanta’ and ‘-ney/-kuna’ differ in their informational state such as new and old information, based on previous studies, and the differences are reflected in the information state of Common Ground. Next, the study analyzed the function of the verbal suffixes within the dialogue model of Ginzburg(2012), which can describe the change of Common Ground in each participant of discourse. As a result, the study can understand the differences of the verbal suffixes from the metapragmatic viewpoint beyond semantics or pragmatics. This work contrasts the previous studies that deal with the differences of the verbal suffixes by means of the unrelated semantic or pragmatic concepts such as verum focus, evidentiality, mirativity.
참고문헌 (43)
- 박재연, "한국어양태 어미 연구", pp.2006~ (2006), 태학사
- 박재연, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-구나’의 의미론", 한국어 의미학, 43, pp.219~245 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- Caffi, Claudia, "Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics", pp.82~91 (2006), Elsevier
- 장경희, "현대국어의 양태범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 조정민, "한국어 인용구문에 나타나는 메타화용적 특징 연구", 언어와언어학, (77), pp.141~168 (2017), 언어연구소[DOI]
- 조국현, "메타의사소통은 의사소통의 ‘수호천사’인가?", 독어독문학, 44(3), pp.333~351 (2003), 한국독어독문학회
- 조용준, "한국어의 의외성 범주의 실현과 그 양상", 한말연구, (40), pp.251~278 (2016), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- Clark, Herbert, "Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition", pp.127~283 (1991), American Psychological Association
- Clark, Herbert, "Using Languages" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Cooper, Robin, "Austinian truth, Attitudes and Type Theory", Research on Language and Computation, 3, pp.333~362 (2005)
- Culpeper, Jonathan, "Pragmatics and the English Language" (2014), Red Globe Press
- Engdahl, Elisabet, "Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6", pp.93~111 (2006), Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr
- Ginzburg, Jonathan, "The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing", pp.429~481 (2013), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Ginzburg, Jonathan, "The Interactive Stance – Meaning for Conversation" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Ginzburg, Jonathan, "The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics", pp.130~169 (2016), Cambridge University Press
- 장채린, "한국어 문법 항목의 의미 기술의 메타언어 연구 -문법서의 종결어미뜻풀이를 중심으로", 제34차 한국문법교육학회 학술대회 (2021)
- 정순화, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’와 ‘-구나’ 비교 연구", 한국어 의미학, 71, pp.25~46 (2021), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- Kecskes, Istvan, "Activating, seeking, and creating common ground", Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, pp.331~355 (2009)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2018), 집문당
- 구본관, "한국어 문법 총론 1" (2015), 집문당
- Larsson, Staffan, "Issue based Dialogue Management", Ph.D., pp.2002
- 이해윤, "Verum Focus로서의 한국어 어말어미 ‘-지’", 언어연구, 30(2), pp.417~438 (2014), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
- 이해윤, "한국어의 진리치초점", 독어학, (34), pp.185~209 (2016), 한국독어학회[DOI]
- 이숙진, "서술종결형어미 ‘-단다’의 형성과 의미기능 분석", 우리어문연구, (39), pp.209~239 (2011), 우리어문학회
- 이성범, "Metapragmatics of Speech and Its Interactions with Pragmatic Inferences", 담화와 인지, 14(2), pp.117~136 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 이성범, "화용론 연구의 거시적 관점" (2012), 소통
- Leech, Geoffrey, "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Lewis, David, "Scorekeeping in a language game", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, pp.339~359 (1979)
- Lucy, John A., "Reflexive language", pp.9~32 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Mey, "Pragmatics: an introduction" (2001), Blackwell
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박나리, "국어 평서문 종결어미의 서법의미에 대하여 - 격식체와 비격식체의 비교대조를 중심으로", 이화어문논집, 18, pp.321~346 (2000)
- 박나리, "한국어 교육문법에서의 종결어미 기술에 대한 한 제안", 이중언어학, (26), pp.91~116 (2004), 이중언어학회
- 박나리, "‘-는 것이다’ 구문 연구 -문법기능과 담화기능 그리고 화자의 담화전략의 상관성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (65), pp.251~279 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- Silverstein, Michael, "Reflexive Language", pp.33~58 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- 손세모돌, "{-(는", ㄴ)단다}의 어미화, 1998, pp.16, 105~130
- 송재목, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’의 의미기능", 國語學, (76), pp.123~159 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Syntax and semantics 9: pragmatics", pp.315~332 (1978), Academic Press
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Common Ground", Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, pp.701~721 (2002)
- 서경희, "담화분석", pp.121~174 (2016), 종합출판
- Verschueren, Jef, "Understanding pragmatics" (1999), Arnold
- Verschueren, Jef, "Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use", Pragmatics, 10, pp.439~456 (2000)
- 임채훈, "‘감각적 증거’ 양태성과 한국어 어미 교육- ‘-네’, ‘-더라’, ‘-더니’, ‘-길래’ 등을 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (37), pp.199~234 (2008), 이중언어학회[DOI]