賓語와 補語의 區分에 관한 小考

Abstract

For Korea and China, it is similar in that the constituent combined with the predicate by Gaesa is treated as a complement. However, there is also a difference that the noun constituent followed by the predicate is classified as an object in China, but it is divided into an object and a complement according to the characteristic of predicate in Korea. The sentence constituent followed by the predicate is largely classified into three types. First, a noun constituent is combining with the predicate directly. Second, the noun constituent is combining with the predicate directly through Gaesa. Third, more than two noun constituents are consecutive behind the predicate. The part that Korea and China show their differences in classifying the sentence constituent is the first and third case. Gaesa belongs to Heosa(expletive), and the ellipsis of the Heosa(expletive) happens from time to time in a Chinese sentence. For this reason, it is impossible to divide the sentence constituent into the object and complement only with the existence or nonexistence of Gaesa. Thus, it is necessary for object and compliment to standardize the meaning as well as the existence or nonexistence of Gaesa. Regarding the order of dual objects, an indirect object precedes a direct object. For the indirect object, noun or pronoun that indicates a person occupies the most part, and for the direct object, concrete things or abstract concept is appropriate. Concerning dual objects, independence, which does not form grammatical relationship such as modification and possession, should be secured between the two objects. Meanwhile, in the case of the compliment that shows degree, it is usually appropriated with a numeral, so it has a difference that marks period or quantity of predicating action. In this sense, the dual objects and compliment should be distinguished from each other.