본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「入れる」と「넣다」の意味分析 -認知言語学の意味拡張の観点から-

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper tries to analyze both the meanings and the meaning extensions of Japanese verb ‘ireru', which represents, in a multiple manner, both the effect from the outside and the movement toward the inside, and Korean verb ‘neotda', which corresponds the best to ‘ireru'. Seeing that these verbs are polysemies in the meaning extension of which figures of speech get involved, this paper examined the similarities and differences and others through a semantic contrast of these Japanese and Korean verbs, by considering how the meaning extensions develop by means of figures of speech. ‘Ireru’ is classified into the movement of concrete things, the movement by means of instruments, the movements of abstract things and others, and ‘neotda’ is classified and extended into the movement of concrete things, the movement of scales, the movement of abstract things and others. ‘Ireru’ and ‘neotda' alike reveal metaphors by points of similarity, temporal proximities, causal relationships and the extensions by means of figures of speech like metonymy based on instrumental or purposive relations. Schematizing the aspects of meaning extension in ‘ireru’ and ‘neotda’ shows that ‘ireru’ has more semantic domains and many usages used within the same semantic domain. Judging from this, the Japanese polysemy ‘ireru’ has more wider semantic domain than the Korean ‘neotda’ and also corresponds to some related meanings other than ‘neotda’, and this analysis of those two verbs’ meanings and the meaning extensions will contribute to minimizing misuses in vocabulary among learners of Japanese and those of Korean who are not native speakers in their learning languages.

Abstract

This paper tries to analyze both the meanings and the meaning extensions of Japanese verb ‘ireru', which represents, in a multiple manner, both the effect from the outside and the movement toward the inside, and Korean verb ‘neotda', which corresponds the best to ‘ireru'. Seeing that these verbs are polysemies in the meaning extension of which figures of speech get involved, this paper examined the similarities and differences and others through a semantic contrast of these Japanese and Korean verbs, by considering how the meaning extensions develop by means of figures of speech. ‘Ireru’ is classified into the movement of concrete things, the movement by means of instruments, the movements of abstract things and others, and ‘neotda’ is classified and extended into the movement of concrete things, the movement of scales, the movement of abstract things and others. ‘Ireru’ and ‘neotda' alike reveal metaphors by points of similarity, temporal proximities, causal relationships and the extensions by means of figures of speech like metonymy based on instrumental or purposive relations. Schematizing the aspects of meaning extension in ‘ireru’ and ‘neotda’ shows that ‘ireru’ has more semantic domains and many usages used within the same semantic domain. Judging from this, the Japanese polysemy ‘ireru’ has more wider semantic domain than the Korean ‘neotda’ and also corresponds to some related meanings other than ‘neotda’, and this analysis of those two verbs’ meanings and the meaning extensions will contribute to minimizing misuses in vocabulary among learners of Japanese and those of Korean who are not native speakers in their learning languages.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 이우제, "日韓の移動動詞における認知意味論的考察― 「イレル」と「넣다」「들이다」の??について ―", 일어일문학연구, 63(1), pp.407~430 (2007), 한국일어일문학회
  2. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ", pp.122~ (1982), くろしお出版
  3. 辻幸夫, "認知言語学への招待", pp.113~ (2003), 大修舘書店
  4. 松村明, "辞林21" (1993), 三省堂
  5. 森田良行, "基礎日本語辞典", pp.91~95 (1989), 角川書店
  6. 安田吉実, "民衆엣센스 日韓辭典", pp.164~ (1992), 民衆書館
  7. 籾山洋介, "認知意味論のしくみ", pp.65~85 (2002), 研究社
  8. G·レイコフ M·ジョンソン, "レトリックと人生", pp.18~49 (1986), 大修舘書店
  9. Lee Woo-jae, "An Cognitive Semantic Consideration of Locomotive Verbs in Japanese and Korean-About the Correspondence between Ireru, Neotda and Deulida-", Nichigonichibungakukenkyu, 63(4), pp.407~429 (2007)
  10. Teramura Hideo, "The Syntax and Meaning in Japanese", pp.122~ (1982), Kuroshio Bookstore
  11. Tsuji Yukio, "The Invitation to Cognitive Linguistics", pp.113~ (2003), Taishukan Shoten
  12. Matsumura Akira., "Jirin21" (1993), Sanseido
  13. Morita Yoshiyuki, "Basic Japanese Dictionary", pp.91~95 (1989), Kadokawa Shoten
  14. Yasuda Yoshimi., "Minjung Essence Japanese-Korean Dictionary", pp.164~ (1992), Minjung Bookstore
  15. Momiyama Yousuke, "Shikumi in Cognitive Linguistics", pp.64~85 (2002), Kenkyusya
  16. G. Lakoff., "Metaphors We Live By", pp.18~49 (1986), Taishukan Shoten
  17. 荒川修作, "建築する身体 人間を超えていくために" (2004), 春秋社
  18. 大澤正雄, "公立図書館の経営" (2005), 日本図書館協会
  19. 田部井昌子, "資産ゼロから大成功する"魔法の粉"の使い方" (2003), 講談社
  20. 渋井哲也, "チャット依存症候群" (2003), 教育史料出版会
  21. 村橋勝子, "社史の研究" (2002), ダイヤモンド社
  22. 平岩弓枝, "一両二分の女" (1990), 文芸春秋
  23. 공지영, "우리들의 행복한 시간" (2010), 오픈하우스
  24. 김별아, "미실" (2005), 문이당
  25. 한설야, "황혼" (2007), 글누림
  26. 황석영, "어둠의 자식들" (1980), 현암사
  27. 황장엽, "인간중심철학원론" (2008), 시대정신
  28. 동아일보, "ttp:", ~
  29. "매일경제"[URL]
  30. "머니투데이"[URL]
  31. "조선일보"[URL]
  32. "중앙일보"[URL]
  33. "연합뉴스"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)