본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

使役他動性動詞「着せる」の使用実態に関する研究

A Study on the Practical Use of the Causative-Transitive Verb Kiseru(着せる)

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

'Kiseru/着せる' is a verb that functions both as a causative verb and a transitive verb, and has been studied as an intermediate category between the causative verb and the transitive verb. The purpose of this study is to investigate the actual data, focusing on a reflexive action 'Kiru/着る', on what kind of syntax 'Kiseru' is used either as a causative verb or as a transitive verb. 218 sample cases were identified from the ‘Modern Japanese Octopus Balanced Corpus (BCCWJ).’ According to the analysis, when a dative case is a human being and the actor is different from other groups, a reflexive action ‘Kiru’ appears. If a dative case is a human and the actor is also a dative-case, 'kiru' is indirect, which makes it a causative verb. On the contrary, when a dative-case is an inanimate object, a corpse or an animal, and when the performer of the action is a nominative-case, a reflexive action ‘Kiru’ does not appear, which is direct and renders it a transitive verb accordingly. In the previous research, ‘Kiseru’ has been studied as an intermediate category between the causative verb and the transitive verb. When we focus on a reflexive actions in the syntax, however, it can be determined more accurately either as a causative verb or as a transitive verb and are used more properly.

Abstract

'Kiseru/着せる' is a verb that functions both as a causative verb and a transitive verb, and has been studied as an intermediate category between the causative verb and the transitive verb. The purpose of this study is to investigate the actual data, focusing on a reflexive action 'Kiru/着る', on what kind of syntax 'Kiseru' is used either as a causative verb or as a transitive verb. 218 sample cases were identified from the ‘Modern Japanese Octopus Balanced Corpus (BCCWJ).’ According to the analysis, when a dative case is a human being and the actor is different from other groups, a reflexive action ‘Kiru’ appears. If a dative case is a human and the actor is also a dative-case, 'kiru' is indirect, which makes it a causative verb. On the contrary, when a dative-case is an inanimate object, a corpse or an animal, and when the performer of the action is a nominative-case, a reflexive action ‘Kiru’ does not appear, which is direct and renders it a transitive verb accordingly. In the previous research, ‘Kiseru’ has been studied as an intermediate category between the causative verb and the transitive verb. When we focus on a reflexive actions in the syntax, however, it can be determined more accurately either as a causative verb or as a transitive verb and are used more properly.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 井島正弘, "いわゆる再帰動詞文について", 日本語学論集, 16, pp.15~27 (2020), 東京大学出版会
  2. 片山きよみ, "日本語他動詞の再帰用法について", 熊本大学言語論集, 4, pp.325~360 (2005), 熊本大学リポジトリー、熊本大学出版
  3. 工藤真由美, "アスペクト・テンス体系とテクスト-現代日本語の時間の表現", pp.46~96 (1995), ひつじ書房
  4. 呉幸栄, "再帰的な動作をあらわす動詞と名詞とのくみあわせについて-着衣動作と脱衣動作をあらわす動詞を中心に-", 国際教育, 5, pp.57~65 (2012), 千葉大学国際教育センター出版
  5. 権勝林, "ヴォイス体系における再帰性-日・韓対照研究", pp.111~222 (2005), ㈱J&C
  6. 重森千香子, "日本語とスロヴェニア語における再帰行為表現の対照", 日本語教育連絡会議大5回総合報告書, pp.56~67 (1992), 日本語教育連絡会議
  7. 高橋太郎, "動詞九章", pp.133~163 (2003), ひつじ書房
  8. 永井春子, "新編日本古典文学全集18 枕草子", pp.211~ (1997), 小学館
  9. 仁田義雄, "語彙的頭語論の観点から", pp.119~133 (2010), ひつじ書房
  10. 早津恵美子, "朝倉日本語講座6 文法Ⅱ", pp.128~150 (2004), 朝倉書店
  11. 早津恵美子, "日本語のヴォイス", 語学研究所論集, 24, pp.1~16 (2019), 東京外国語大学語学研究所
  12. 早津恵美子, "日本語の使役文の文法的な意味-つかいだてとみちびき", 言語研究, 148, pp.143~174 (2015), 東京外国語大学言語研究所
  13. 山内潤子, "日本語使役受身文の研究-働きかけの間接性・直接性という観点から-", 修士, pp.2008
  14. 李静, "日本語における再帰性をもつ他動詞構文についての体系的研究", 博士, pp.2019
  15. "現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス中納言版(BCCWJ)"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (32건)