본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「名詞+ナ+名詞」における意味的考察

Semantic study on ‘Noun+ナ+Noun’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study was made to clarify the meaning of the ‘noun+ナ+noun’ (hereinafter called ‘N1+ナ+N2’) construction, in which a derivational suffix is made by adding ‘ナ’ to nouns such as ‘ワインな気分’, ‘大人な対応’, and also to investigate the similarities and differences between ’N1+ナ+N2’ and ‘noun+ノ+noun’ (hereinafter called ‘N1+ノ+N2’) and between ‘N1+ナ+N2’ and ‘󰠏的(󰠏teki)’. The semantic features include a prototypical appearance of ‘attribute’. It is further categorized into ‘prototypical N1+ナ’(ex.大人の、大人な対応), which describes the element that fits into the base N1 category, and ‘metaphorical N1+ナ’, which describes the element that does not fit into the base N1 category(例:子供の、大人な対応). Moreover, there exists a form ’N1+ナ+N2’ in which ’pragmatical inference’ is needed because of its context󰠏dependence. As for the contrast ‘N1+ナ+N2’ with ’󰠏的’, which indicates that it has ‘attribute’ in common. However, the point is whether ’pragmatic inference’ is needed or not. On the other hand, through the contrast of ’N1+ナ+N2’ with ’N1+ノ+N2’, it was found that they both require the attribute and pragmatic inference, but while ‘N1+ナ+N2’ prototypically indicates the attribute, ‘N1+ノ+N2’ prototypically indicates N1 as a concrete concept, and peripherally as the attribute. Also, the pragmatic inference needed for 「N1+ナ+N2」 tends to rely more on context than 「N1+ノ+N2」 for its construction which broadens its semantic realizations.

Abstract

This study was made to clarify the meaning of the ‘noun+ナ+noun’ (hereinafter called ‘N1+ナ+N2’) construction, in which a derivational suffix is made by adding ‘ナ’ to nouns such as ‘ワインな気分’, ‘大人な対応’, and also to investigate the similarities and differences between ’N1+ナ+N2’ and ‘noun+ノ+noun’ (hereinafter called ‘N1+ノ+N2’) and between ‘N1+ナ+N2’ and ‘󰠏的(󰠏teki)’. The semantic features include a prototypical appearance of ‘attribute’. It is further categorized into ‘prototypical N1+ナ’(ex.大人の、大人な対応), which describes the element that fits into the base N1 category, and ‘metaphorical N1+ナ’, which describes the element that does not fit into the base N1 category(例:子供の、大人な対応). Moreover, there exists a form ’N1+ナ+N2’ in which ’pragmatical inference’ is needed because of its context󰠏dependence. As for the contrast ‘N1+ナ+N2’ with ’󰠏的’, which indicates that it has ‘attribute’ in common. However, the point is whether ’pragmatic inference’ is needed or not. On the other hand, through the contrast of ’N1+ナ+N2’ with ’N1+ノ+N2’, it was found that they both require the attribute and pragmatic inference, but while ‘N1+ナ+N2’ prototypically indicates the attribute, ‘N1+ノ+N2’ prototypically indicates N1 as a concrete concept, and peripherally as the attribute. Also, the pragmatic inference needed for 「N1+ナ+N2」 tends to rely more on context than 「N1+ノ+N2」 for its construction which broadens its semantic realizations.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 影山太郎, "日英対照 形容詞・副詞の意味と構文", pp.72~75 (2009), 大修館書店
  2. 北村弘明, "語幹からみた"ナ形容詞"の一考察", 聖徳大学研究紀要人文学部, 2(1), pp.127~135 (1991)
  3. 權善和, "カタカナ語の連體修飾形「~な」について", 일본학보, (61), pp.17~32 (2004), 한국일본학회
  4. 鈴木康之, "ノ格の名詞と名詞とのくみあわせ(1)", 教育国語, 55, pp.12~24 (1978)
  5. 田野村忠温, "形容動詞連体形における「な", の」選択の一要因-「有名な」と「無名の」, 2002, pp.23(4), 207~223
  6. 趙虹, "新しい用法における接尾辞「的」の意味と機能", 日中言語研究と日本語教育, (창간), pp.35~43 (2008)
  7. 張佩霞, "含意される格関係から見る日本語の連休助詞 「の」", 言語文化論叢, 11, pp.73~80 (2002)
  8. 中山陽介, "「特別な思い」と「特別の思い」-〈第二形容詞〉と〈第三形容詞〉の揺れについて-", 阪大日本語研究, 16, pp.131~159 (2004)
  9. 西山佑司, "日本語名詞句の意味論と語用論 : 指示的名詞句と非指示的名詞句", pp.1~58 (2003), ひつじ書房
  10. 村木新次郎, "日本語の品詞体系とその周辺", pp.243~254 (2012), ひつじ書房
  11. 松村明監修, "デジタル大辞泉" (2012), 小学館
  12. 森山新, "認知言語学的観点による日本語の連体修飾研究-連体修飾節・ノを用いた連体修飾を中心に-", 日本学報, 72, pp.42~58 (2007)
  13. 山田巌, "発生期における的ということば", 言語生活, 120, pp.56~61 (1961)
  14. "国語研日本語ウェブコーパス"[URL]
  15. "Yahoo! JAPAN"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)