名詞の意味関係と連体助詞の出現様相について-日本語と韓国語を中心に-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to describe a relation between nominal meaning and presence/absence of the noun connective particle “の/ui” in Japanese and Korean. In the first place, we analyzed the meaning of N1 and N2 in each case of presence and absence of the noun connective particle “の” and “ui”. From the result of the analysis, We tried to explain the reason why the “zero noun connective particle” noun phrase can exist in Korean. In section3, we argued about the semantic relationship between N1 and N2 of the “omissible ”の“ and ”ui“ noun phrases”, and from the results, we could find out that there is a difference in meaning between “N1의/のN2” and “N1 N2”. The points are as follows. First, both Japanese and Korean “N1의/のN2” type noun phrase have a semantic relationship which N2 is included in the whole noun phrase semantically. Second, N1 which is in a “の” or “ui” omitted noun phrase represents property, condition, shape, and materials of N2. But in Japanese, it is possible to represent both meaning with one form such as “N1のN2“. In the next section, we analyzed the semantic relation between N1 and N2 of the “zero noun connective particle” noun phrase which does not allow to have a noun connective particle in Korean. And we could explain that the reason why there are not allowed to have a noun connective particle is because of the meaning of N1. These type of noun phrases represent only one meaning which N1 always means property, condition, shape, and materials of N2. Whereas Japanese “N1のN2” can represent both meaning because it is very rare for particle “no” to be omitted in Japanese noun phrases. From the results above, it seems to deeply related to meaning of nouns and presence/absence of the noun connective particle between two languages.
Abstract
This study aims to describe a relation between nominal meaning and presence/absence of the noun connective particle “の/ui” in Japanese and Korean. In the first place, we analyzed the meaning of N1 and N2 in each case of presence and absence of the noun connective particle “の” and “ui”. From the result of the analysis, We tried to explain the reason why the “zero noun connective particle” noun phrase can exist in Korean. In section3, we argued about the semantic relationship between N1 and N2 of the “omissible ”の“ and ”ui“ noun phrases”, and from the results, we could find out that there is a difference in meaning between “N1의/のN2” and “N1 N2”. The points are as follows. First, both Japanese and Korean “N1의/のN2” type noun phrase have a semantic relationship which N2 is included in the whole noun phrase semantically. Second, N1 which is in a “の” or “ui” omitted noun phrase represents property, condition, shape, and materials of N2. But in Japanese, it is possible to represent both meaning with one form such as “N1のN2“. In the next section, we analyzed the semantic relation between N1 and N2 of the “zero noun connective particle” noun phrase which does not allow to have a noun connective particle in Korean. And we could explain that the reason why there are not allowed to have a noun connective particle is because of the meaning of N1. These type of noun phrases represent only one meaning which N1 always means property, condition, shape, and materials of N2. Whereas Japanese “N1のN2” can represent both meaning because it is very rare for particle “no” to be omitted in Japanese noun phrases. From the results above, it seems to deeply related to meaning of nouns and presence/absence of the noun connective particle between two languages.
참고문헌 (23)
- 권재일, "조사의 성격과 그 생략현상에대한기술방법", 語学研究, 25, pp.129~139 (1989), 서울대학교어학연구소
- 권진홍, "한국어 비서술성명사의 논항연구" (2010), 역락
- 金光海, "{의}의의미", 문법연구, 5, pp.161~228 (1984), 塔出版社
- 김기혁, "관형구성의 통어현상과 의미관계", 한글, 209, pp.59~97 (1990), 한글학회
- 김동성, "서술어", 비서술어 명사 구조의 생산성, 2012, pp.29(2), 403~434[DOI]
- 金明姫, "{의}의意味機能", 언어, 12(2), pp.248~260 (1987), 한국언어학회
- 김인균, "국어의 명사문법Ⅰ" (2005), 역락
- 任洪彬, "存在前提와属格標識 의", 언어와 언어학, 7, pp.61~78 (1981), 한국외국어대학교언어연구소
- 정희정, "말뭉치기반국어연구총서6, In 한국어명사연구" (2000), 한국문화사
- 石井正彦, ",第2部 複合名詞の形成, In 現代日本語の複合語形成論", pp.155~244 (2007), ひつじ書房
- 呉玹定, "の,と韓国語の,N1wiN2,：名詞名詞の連結際,wi,の出現を中心に", 日本学報, 16, pp.105~119 (1997), 大阪大大学 院日本学研究室
- 大島資生, "日本語連体修飾節構造の研究" (2010), ひつじ書房
- 奥津敬一郎, "の,のいろいろ, In 口語文法講座３ゆれている文法", pp.238~253 (1964), 明治書院
- 影山太郎, "文法と語形成" (1993), くろしお
- 金光泰, "連体修飾構造について ,の,による連体修飾形を中心に", 国語学研究, 30, pp.40~48 (1990), 東北大学
- 島田雅晴, "名詞修飾の構造から普遍文法を考える, In 次世代の言語研究Ⅲ", pp.85~109 (2004), 筑波大 学
- 西山佑司, "NP1のNP2,と“NP２ofNP1”", 日本語学, 12, pp.65~71 (1993), 明治書院
- 西山佑司, "日本語名詞句の意味論と語用論―指示的名詞句と非指示的名詞句―" (2003), ひつじ書房
- 朴在權, "現代日本語·韓国語の格助詞の比較研究" (1997), 勉誠社
- 홍영주, "「の」と「의」の実現如何に関する日韓対照研究 -語用論における「焦点」の観点から-", 일어일문학, 57(57), pp.127~142 (2013), 대한일어일문학회
- 丸山直子, "助詞の脱落現象", 言語, 25(1), pp.74~80 (1996), 大修館
- 三宅知宏, "主要部,の概念と“XのY”形態名詞句", 鶴見大学紀要, 38, pp.9~18 (2001), 鶴見大学
- 森捨信, "日本語の "甲ノ乙" 名詞句- "甲ノ"の統語的二面性", 言語, 225, pp.82~88 (1993), 大修館