국가혁신역량과 제도의 질이 경제성장에 미치는 영향
The Impact of National Innovation Capabilities and Institutional Quality on Economic Growth
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
국가가 새로운 경제체제로 들어서게 되면서 겪는 어려움과 피해는 생각보다 크다. 지금까지 경제 패러다임이 바뀌면서 국가들이 겪었던 과정을 거치며 경제의 성장과 수렴을 일으킨 여러 가지 요인이 있었다. 특히 혁신과 제도는 그간의 경제성장에 있어서 중요한요소임에도 횡단면 분석이나 경제적 모형측면에서만 다루어졌던 한계성이 있다. 본 연구에서는 국가혁신역량의 다양성과 제도의 질이 국가의 경제성장에 미치는 요인을 살펴보려고한다. 또한 최근 경제성장의 주요요인으로 다루어지고 있는 인적자본역량과 해외직접투자와의 관계도 살펴보며, 경제성장 모형에 대한 심층적 고찰을 한다. 경제수준에 따라서 총 4개의국가그룹으로 64개 국가를 대상으로 분석하였으며, 1995년부터 2011년까지의 데이터를 기반으로 패널모형을 사용해 연구문제에 대해 구조적인 측면의 시사점을 살펴보았다. 연구결과, 국가의 경제수준에 따라서 연구개발 비중과 혁신역량의 다양성은 경제성장에 의미있는 변화를 주었으며, 해외직접투자는 모든 소득그룹에서 경제성장에 긍정적인 효과를 보였다. 국가혁신역량에 있어서는 확산성과 개방성이 경제성장에 가장 의미있는 변수였으며, 이는 경제수준이 높은 국가들의 혁신역량이 경제성장에 미치는 영향이 크기 때문이라고 보인다. 반대로, 경제수준이 낮을수록 혁신역량 및 제도의 수준이 경제성장에 부정적인 영향을 미친다. 개별국가의 제도의 질 및 경제수준에 따라서 차별적이기에 모호한 측면이 있다고 판단된다. 본연구를 통해서 국가의 경제수준에 따른 혁신 요소 및 제도적 요인의 적절한 투입과 정책수립에 중요하다는 시사점을 줄 수 있다고 보인다.
Abstract
The global economy is rapidly changing by technological innovation and diffusion of knowledge across nations. Therefore it is still important issue to find a major variables for convergence and divergence of economic development. The studies up to present on the relationship between innovation and institution has limitations that they have dealt with this issue only in term of cross-sectional study or mathematical research models. This paper aims at analyzing the impact of innovation capabilities and institutional quality on the economic growth. Empirically this paper will explore the relationship among human capital capacity and FDI, R&D expenditures and innovation capabilities and institutional quality. This paper analyzes 64 countries, which were divided into 4 groups depending on the level of economic development. Based on the data from 1995 to 2011 and by using a panel model, we look at the structural implications of the research questions. According to our analysis, the weight of R&D and the innovation capabilities were identified as important determinants of economic growth, and FDI was significant factor for economic growth in the upper middle group countries. In case of the innovation capabilities of countries, the diffusion and openness of innovation were most meaningful variables for economic growth. Also, institutional quality has a significantly positive impact. However, in the low-level economic group, innovation capabilities and institutions have a negative impact on economic growth. This paper identifies an important policy implications that of national innovation and institutional factors should be properly invested in accordance with the level of a country’s economic growth.
참고문헌 (47)
- 곽태운, "세계화가 소득불평등도에 미친 효과: 세계전체 패널자료분석", 국제지역연구, 18(1), pp.201~225 (2014), 국제지역학회
- 김정홍, "기술혁신의 경제학" (2011), 시그마 프레스
- 선⋅개도국 간 기술개발 격차 해소방안을 위한 국제논의 동향 및 대응방안 연구, "류태규", 한국지식재산연구원, ~, pp.인프라 기초연구과제 보고서 2010-4 (2010)
- 민인식, "STATA패널데이터 분석" (2012), 지필미디어
- 이종한, "제도적 특성과 규제개혁의 상호보완관계가 경제성장에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 -OECD 국가의 생산물시장 규제를 중심으로-", 규제연구, 21(1), pp.135~168 (2012), 한국규제학회[DOI]
- 이희연, "고급통계분석론: 이론과 실습" (2013), 문우사
- 정선양, "기술과 경영" (2012), 경문사
- Abramobitz, M., "The Mosaic of Economic Growth", pp.21~62 (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Acemoglu, D., "Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth", Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), pp.37~74 (2006)
- Acemoglu, D., "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: an Empirical Investigation", American Economic Review, 91, pp.1369~1401 (2001)
- Anghel, B., "Do Institutions Affect Foreign Direct Investment?", International Doctorate in Economic Analysis, 2(40), pp.508~522 (2005)
- Archibugi, D., "A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo)", World Development, 32(4), pp.629~654 (2004)
- Basberg, B. L., "Patents and the Measurement of Technological Change: a Survey of the Literature", Research Policy, 16(2), pp.131~141 (1987)
- Breschi, S., "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation", The Economic Journal, 110(463), pp.388~410 (2000)
- Carlsson, B., "Internationalization of Innovation Systems: A Survey of the Literature", Research Policy, 35(1), pp.56~67 (2006)
- A Technology-Gap Approach to Cumulative Growth: Toward an Integrated Model, "Castellacci, F.", DRUID, ~, pp.DRUID Working Paper, No. 01-04 (2001)
- Castellacci, F., "The Dynamics of National Innovation Systems: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the Coevolution between Innovative Capability and Absorptive Capacity", Research Policy, 42(3), pp.579~594 (2013)
- Absorptive Capacity: a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, "Cohen, W. M.", Administrative Science Quarterly, 128~152 (1990)
- Costantini, V., "Technology Transfer, Institutions and Development", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, pp.26~48 (2014)
- Dasgupta, P., "Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity", The Economic Journal, pp.266~293 (1980)
- Economics, W. I. P. O., "World Intellectual Property Indicators", ~ (2014)
- Fagerberg, J., "A Technology Gap Approach to Why Growth Rates Differ", Research Policy, 16(2), pp.87~99 (1987)
- Fagerberg, J., "Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates", Journal of economic Literature, pp.1147~1175 (1994)
- Fagerberg, J., "Technology-Gaps, Innovation-Diffusion and Transformation:an Evolutionary Interpretation", Research Policy, 31(8), pp.1291~1304 (2002)
- Technology and Development: Unpacking the Relationship(s), "Fagerberg, J.", TIK, ~ (2008)
- Fagerberg, J., "Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 2", pp.833~872 (2010)
- Gujarati, D. N., "Basic Econometrics" (2008), McGraw-Hill Education
- Greenaway, D., "Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Performance and Trade liberalisation", The World Economy, 30(2), pp.197~210 (2007)
- Governance Matters: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002, "Kaufmann, D.", World Bank, ~, pp.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 40 (2004)
- Khoury T. A., "Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean", Journal of World Business, 46(3), pp.337~345 (2011)
- Kim, C. W., "Innovation, Technological Regimes and Organizational Selection in Industry Evolution: a ‘History Friendly Model’of the DRAM industry", Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(6), pp.1195~1221 (2003)
- Kim, L., "Stages of Development of Industrial Technology in a Developing Country: a Model", Research Policy, 9(3), pp.254~277 (1980)
- Kim, L., "Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning" (1997), Harvard Business Press
- Klevorick, A. K., "On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities", Research Policy, 24(2), pp.185~205 (1995)
- 이근, "Making a Technological Catch-up: Barriers and Opportunities", 기술혁신연구, 13(2), pp.97~132 (2005), 기술경영경제학회
- Lee, K., "Technological Regimes, Catching-up and Leapfrogging Findings form the Korean Industries", Research Policy, 30(3), pp.459~483 (2001)
- Malerba, F., "Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production", Research Policy, 31, pp.247~264 (2002)
- Human Capital and Knowledge Assets: Enabling Social Capital and Intellectual Capital, "Malhotra, Y.", Syracuse University, ~ (2003)
- Manca F., "Technology Catch-up and the Role of Institutions", Journal of Macroeconomics, 32(4), pp.1041~1053 (2010)
- Oddi, A. S., "The International Patent System and Third World Development: Reality or Myth?", Duke Law Journal, pp.831~878 (1987)
- OECD, "OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014" (2014), OECD Publishing
- Park, KH., "Linking the Technological Regime to the Technological Catch-up Analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US Patent Data", Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4), pp.715~753 (2006)
- Park, W. G., "International Patenting, Patent Rights, and Technology Gaps", Reviews of Economics and Institutions, 4(1), pp.1~25 (2013)
- Pitelis, C. N., "Innovation, Growth and Competitiveness", pp.281~303 (2011), Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Rodrik, D., "Institutions Rule: the Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development", Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), pp.131~165 (2004)
- Romer, P. M., "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth", The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), pp.1002~1037
- Schmidt, E. K., "Research Management and Policy: Incentives and Obstacles to a Better Public-Private Interaction", International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(6), pp.623~636 (2008)
