『금강반야경소』의 저술 경로 재고찰 ‒ 천태지의의 저술로 전해지는 『금강반야경소』와 길장소⋅승조주의 관계 ‒

Abstract

There exist six Chinese translations of the Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā. Among them, the Chinese translation by Kumārajīva has been preferred by the earliest Chinese commentators such as Zhiyi, Jizang, and Sengzhao. The relationship between Zhiyi’s commentary, the Jingang Banruo Jing Shu (『金剛般若經疏』), and Jizang’s commentary, Jingang Banruo Shu (『金剛般若疏』), has been dealt with and figured out prominently by Hirai, who asserted that Zhiyi’s commentary had been influenced by Jizang’s commentary. In this paper, I tried to find out another relationship between Zhiyi’s commentary and the Jingang Jing Zhu (『金剛經註』), the earliest Chinese commentary on the Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā. For this, I collated the Jingang Jing Shu with the Jingang Jing Zhu word by word up to the sixteenth Chapter. As a result of this collation, I was able to find out the cases where Zhi-yi had quoted the sentences of the latter in the exegesis of the main text of the Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā (隨文解釋) with or without changing the words from the Jingang Jing Zhu. On the other hand, there were other cases where he had quoted or paraphrased them in the part of the essential meanings (玄義) from the Jingang Banruo Shu. These cases indicate that, I believe, not only Jizang’s commentary, as proposed by Hirai, but also Sengzhao’s commentary might have had a great influence on the commentary by Zhiyi.