법과학 연구기관의 합리적인 모델과 설계

Abstract

The U.S. and European forensic sciences have been continuing to quantify the reliability and relevancy of research based on the tangible data of crime-related evidence. The forensic examination of the traditional comparative method of the forensic community, to face the problem of human error due to the subjective judgment of the examiners. So, through the support of State and forensic institutions, the detailed portion of the forensic research Group has collectively been conducting research for the quantification of forensic evidence. In this study, we have researched the U.S. forensic standardization research background, installation, established goals, and complementary relationships between organizations in OSAC (organization of Scientific Area committees). We would like to present a rational model with a direction to be presented to the forensic research institutes that require the standardization of forensic science at the beginning of the full opening of the Korean law market. In order to systematically manage the procedures of reasonable evidence and to derive an examination and standardized guidelines, OSAC, a Working Group (subcommittee) requires a structure for standardized research along with forensic tasks. For the scientific results of the forensic examination, the Review committee shall constitute a law enforcement, an academic system, and a professional. Therefore, The aim is to speed up the processing of forensic examination processes and minimize human errors by performing complementary and relative verification procedures. And it is also the prevention of chronic losses from the redundancies between forensic laboratories and the possible losses from referral to unverified private forensic supplier, and It can also contribute to the reliability of the forensic examination procedures.