형사재판상 과학적 증거의 기준과 국내 발전방향 -최근 미국에서의 과학적 증거의 개혁논의를 중심으로-
The Standard of Admissibility of Forensic Evidence and Its Future Direction in Korea - Focusing on the recent reformation of Forensic Science in the United States -
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As criminal investigation utilizing scientific theories and techniques continues to develop, criminal trials are more dependent on forensic evidence. This study applies the Daubert rule of the United States to the Korean criminal cases where forensic evidence is at issue and analyzes them to learn whether the Korean judiciary sets forth any specific and consistent standards for scientific evidence. This article: 1) introduces the failure of scientific evidence which led to a multitude of wrongful convictions in the United States: 2) discusses the problems that have rendered the Daubert rule ineffective, deemed a relatively consistent and reasonable standard to review the validity of scientific methods in everyday trials: 3) points to the need to establish research culture in Korea for the purpose of securing the accuracy and objectivity of forensic evidence. Especially, this paper stresses the experts' roles in setting forth the standard to test scientific validity and error rates, (and thus) boosting peer review, providing education programs and guidelines for lab analysts,and supplying courts with precise information on forensic evidence. For this purpose, this paper concludes that the government needs to fund and promote the Scientific Working Group (SWG) in Korea.
Abstract
As criminal investigation utilizing scientific theories and techniques continues to develop, criminal trials are more dependent on forensic evidence. This study applies the Daubert rule of the United States to the Korean criminal cases where forensic evidence is at issue and analyzes them to learn whether the Korean judiciary sets forth any specific and consistent standards for scientific evidence. This article: 1) introduces the failure of scientific evidence which led to a multitude of wrongful convictions in the United States: 2) discusses the problems that have rendered the Daubert rule ineffective, deemed a relatively consistent and reasonable standard to review the validity of scientific methods in everyday trials: 3) points to the need to establish research culture in Korea for the purpose of securing the accuracy and objectivity of forensic evidence. Especially, this paper stresses the experts' roles in setting forth the standard to test scientific validity and error rates, (and thus) boosting peer review, providing education programs and guidelines for lab analysts,and supplying courts with precise information on forensic evidence. For this purpose, this paper concludes that the government needs to fund and promote the Scientific Working Group (SWG) in Korea.
참고문헌 (35)
- 권창국, "범죄수사 및 형사공판에 있어서 지문증거에 의한 개인식별과 관련한 몇 가지 문제점의 고찰", 형사정책연구, 14(4)통권 : 56, pp.201~246 (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김민지, "전문가의 법정 증언에 대한 인식 및 증언의 허용성 평가", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 24(3), pp.77~90 (2010), 한국사회및성격심리학회
- 박광배, "과학적 증거의 법적 타당성", 형사정책연구, 8(1)통권 : 29 (1997), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박노섭, "과학적 증거의 증거능력 인정기준에 관한 고찰", 경찰법연구, 7(1)통권 : 9, pp.30~52 (2009), 한국경찰법학회
- 심희기, "과학적 증거의 허용성(증거능력)과 신빙성(증명력)에 관한 판례의 동향", 고시계 (1999)
- 심희기, "과학적 증거의 허용성과 신빙성", 형사법연구, (12) (1999), 한국형사정책연구원
- 유제설, "법과학대학원 도입에 관한 연구", 순천향대학교 사회과학 연구, 16(2) (2010)
- 주요 선진국의 과학적 수사기법의 도입과 활용방안 연구, "유혁상", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구총서 04-38 (2004)
- Jack B. Weinsetin, "Weinstein's Evidence Manual Student Edition, (8th ed.)" (2007), LexisNexis
- "ISO", IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories(2nd ed.), 2005
- Kenneth S. Broun, "McCormick on Evidence (6th eds.)" (2006), Thomson
- National Research Council, "Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward" (2009), the National Academics
- Paul Giannelli, "The Daubert Trilogy and the Law of Expert Testimony, In Evidence Stories", pp.181~185 (2006)
- Brandon L. Garret, "Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions", Va. L. Rev, 95(1) (2009)
- Clive A. Stafford Smith, "Forensic Hair Comparison Analysis: Nineteenth Century Science or Twentieth Century Snake Oil", Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev, 27, pp.227~ (1996)
- J. L. Mnookin, "The Validity of Latent Fingerprint identification:Confession of a Fingerprinting Moderate", Law, Probability and Risk, 7 (2009)
- Jennifer L. Mnookin, "The Need For A Research Culture In The Forensic Sciences", UCLA L. Rev, 58, pp.725~ (2011)
- Joseph Sanders, "Utterly Ineffective: Do Courts Have a Role in Improving the Quality of Forensic Expert Testimony", Fordham Urb. L. J, 38, pp.547~ (2010)
- Marilyn A. Huestis, "Cannabinoid Concentrations in Hair from Documented Cannabis Users", Forensic Sci. Int'l, 169(2) (2006)
- Michael J. Saks, "Explaining the Tension Between the Supreme Court's Embrace of Validity as the Touchstone of Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Lower Court's (Seeming) Rejection of Same", Epistme, 5, pp.329~ (2008)
- Michael T. Flannery, "The Use of Hair Analysis To Test Children Exposure to Methamphetamine", MSUJMEDL, 10, pp.143~ (2006)
- Munia Jabbar, "Overcoming Dauberts Shortcomings in Criminal Trials:Making the Error Rate the Primary Factor in Dauberts Validity Inquiry", N.Y.U.L. Rev, 85, pp.2034~ (2010)
- Paul C. Giannelli, "Microscopic Hair Comparisons: A Cautionary Tale", Crim. Law. Bulletin Art, 46(3), pp.7~ (2010)
- Peter Huber, "Rebel Without A Cause:Galileo's Revenge:Junk Science in the Courtroom", Harv. L. Rev, 105, pp.935~ (1992)
- P. J. Neufeld, "The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice:And suggestions for reform", American Journal of Public Health, 95(Supp. 1) (2005)
- Theresa K. Casserly, "Evidentiary and Constitutional Implications of Employee Drug Testing Through Hair Analysis", Clev. St. L. Rev, 45, pp.469~ (1997)
- William S. Laufer, "the Rhetoric of Innocence", Wash. L. Rev, 70(17), pp.329~337 (1995)
- 오이석, "국과수 1차 모발검사만으론 유죄 인정 어려워", 인터넷 법률신문, ~ (2004)