본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

내각안정성 결정인자의 교차국가적 측정을 위한 등가지표의 구축전략: 방법론적 선행연구

Methodological Strategy for Constructing Cross-national Equivalent Measures of Explanatory Variables for Cabinet Stability: A Pilot Study

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

등가성과 교차사례적 측정타당성을 지닌 내각안정성 결정인자의측정지표를 구축하기 위해 중다회귀분석을 수행하여 13개 지표로 조작정의된 4개 설명변인의 구성타당성을 확인한 결과, 정치적 균열양태의 지표인 야당집중도가 교차사례적 구성타당성을 확보하고 있음을 발견하였다. 이처럼 야당집중도가 교차사례적 구성타당성을 지닌것으로 확인됨에 따라 각 지역별 표본(서유럽 표본, 중남미 표본, 서유럽-중남미 통합표본)을 대상으로 정치적 균열양태 변인의 7가지조작지표를 이용하여 인자분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과 세 표본에서모두 지표들이 3개 인자로 구분ㆍ결집되었으나, 인자의 결집양상에있어서 상당한 교차지역적 변이가 표출됨에 따라 이러한 지표들을사용할 경우 분석모형의 내적 타당성이 상실된다는 사실이 밝혀졌다. 세 번째 단계에서는 세 표본 모두에서 동일한 인자로 결집되는 지표들(의회분절도, 제1정당 의석점유율, 정당집중도)을 사례별 지표로 선택, 인자분석을 수행하여 이들이 하나의 맥락으로 통합될 수 있음을확인한 후, 이들을 결합한 통합적 등가인자를 도출하였다. 마지막으로는 통합적 등가인자를 이용한 집단별 회귀모형을 비교ㆍ평가함으로써 분석모형의 적용적실성 여부를 점검하였다i

Abstract

A multiple regression analysis of the 4 variables operationalized in terms of the 13 indicators for measuring cabinet stability shows that the Herfindahl Index of Opposition(HIO), an index of political cleavage, maintains cross-cases equivalence and measurement validity. As HIO possess cross-cases construct validity, three separate factor analyses for the West European sample, the Latin American sample, and the integrated sample of the West Europe and Latin America have been performed for the 7 indicators of political cleavage. While the result of each factor analysis shows that the indicators are clustered around the 3 factors, clustering pattern demonstrates significant cross-cases variance, leading to a tentative conclusion that a causal model comprising these indicators is likely to lose internal validity. As parliamentary fractionalization, percentage of seats held by largest party, HIO fall into the same categorical factor in each sample, additional factor analysis has been done to see if they are clustered around the same context, the result of which shows that they can be incorporated into one integrated factor with cross-cases equivalence. Finally the comparison of group-wise regression models comprising the integrated factor confirms the applicability of each model..

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 김웅진, "비교지역연구에 있어서 교차사례적 측정지표의 타당성:사례별 등가지표의 구축전략", 세계지역연구논총, 22권(2호) (2004), 한국세계지역학회
  2. 김웅진, "비교사회연구방법론-비교정치ㆍ비교행정ㆍ지역연구의 전략" (2000), 한울 아카데미
  3. 김웅진, "지역연구전략의 경험과학적 재구성: 선택전략 · 소거전략 · 확산추적전략", 21세기정치학회보, 12(2) (2002), 21세기정치학회
  4. 김지희, "경험과학적 지역연구모형에 있어서 등가지표의 추적: 방법론적 전략", 비교민주주의연구, 1(1) (2005)
  5. 김지희, "내각안정성의 정치ㆍ경제적 인자에 관한 경험적 탐색: 21개 대통령제 국가를 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 33(4) (2000)
  6. 김지희, "신뢰와 내각의 안정성: 서유럽 내각제국가에 대한 교차사례분석", 세계지역연구논총, 22권(2호) (2004), 한국세계지역학회
  7. 김지희, "교차제도비교(cross-institutional comparison)를 통한 정부안정성 결정인자의 경험적 탐색 : 의회분절도, 대정부 항거시위 및 신뢰의 등가성 평가", EU연구, (25), pp.145~172 (2009), EU연구소
  8. 김지희, "비교지역연구전략-방법론적 성찰" (2003), 인간사랑
  9. 진영재, "유효정당수(Effective Number of Parties) 계산법의 문제점: 정당연합이론을 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 33(4) (1999)
  10. Baaklini, A., "Designs For Democratic Stability: Studies in Viable Constitutionalism" (1971), M. E. Sharpe
  11. Barber, B., "The Logic and Limits of Trust" (1983), Rutgers University Press
  12. Blondel, J., "Party Systems and Pattern of Government in Western Democracies", Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1 (1968)
  13. Blondel, J., "Government Ministers in the Contemporary World" (1985), Sage
  14. Braithwaite, V., "Trust and Governance" (1988), Russell Sage Foundation
  15. Brown, E., "An Event Approach to The Problem of Cabinet Stability", Comparative Political Studies, 17 (1984)
  16. Carmines, E., "Reliability and Validity Assessment. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences" (1979), Sage
  17. Cronbach, L., "Construct Validity in Psychological Test", Psychological Bulletin, 52 (1955)
  18. Dodd, L., "Coalitions in Parliamentary Governments" (1976), Princeton University Press
  19. Feld, S., "The Laakso-Taagepera Index in A Mean and Variance Network", Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19(1) (2007)
  20. Frey, F., "Cross-cultural Survey Research in Political Science, In The Methodology of Comparative Research" (1970), Free Press
  21. Frijda, N., "On the Scope and Methods of Cross-Cultural Research", International Journal of Psychology, 1(2)
  22. Guy Peters, B., "Comparative Politics, Theory and Methods" (1998), New York University Press
  23. Iyengar, S., "Assessing Linguistic Equivalence in Multilingual Surveys", Comparative Politics, 8(4) (1976)
  24. Kaiser, A., "Alternation, Inclusion and the European Union", European Union Politics, 3(4) (2002)
  25. Landman, T., "Human Rights: Principle, Practice and Policy", Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4) (2004)
  26. Lijphart, A., "Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method", The American Political Science Review, 53(3) (1971)
  27. Lijphart, A., "The Comparable-cases Strategy in Comparative Research", Comparative Political Studies, 8(2) (1975)
  28. Lijphart, A., "Measures of Cabinet Durability: A Conceptual and Empirical Evaluation", Comparative Political Studies, 17 (1984)
  29. Lijphart, A., "Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government" (1992), Oxford University Press
  30. Lijphart, A., "Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries" (1999), Yale University Press
  31. Munck, G., "Canons of Research Design in Qualitative Analysis", Studies in Comparative International Development, 33(3)
  32. Przeworski, A., "Equivalence in Cross-National Research", The Public Opinion Quarterly, 30 (1966)
  33. Przeworski, A., "The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry" (1970), Wiley
  34. Rae, D., "The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws" (1967), Yale University Press
  35. Ragin, C., "The Comparative Method, Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies" (1987), University of California Press
  36. Roberts, A., "What Kind of Democracy is Emerging in Eastern Europe", Post-Soviet Affairs, 22(1) (2006)
  37. Robertson, J., "Toward a Political-Economic Accounting of the Endurance of Cabinet Administrations: An Empirical Assessment of Eight European Democracies", American Journal of Political Science, 28 (1984)
  38. Rokkan, S., "Comparative Cross-National Research: The Context of Current Efforts, In Comparing Nations, The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research" (1966), Yale University Press
  39. Sanders, D., "The Stability and Survival of Governments in Western Democracies", Acta Politica, 12 (1977)
  40. Sartori, G., "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics", The American Political Science Review, 64(4) (1970)
  41. Scott, W. A., "Measures of Test Homogeneity", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1966)
  42. Stoll, H., "Social Cleavages and the Number of Parties: How the Measures You Choose Affect the Answer You Get", Comparative Political Studies, 41(11) (2008)
  43. Taylor, M., "Government Coalitions in Western Europe", European Journal of Political Research, 1 (1973)
  44. Taylor, M., "Party Systems and Government Stability", American Political Science Review, 65
  45. Teune, H., "Measurement in Comparative Research, In Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research" (1990), Sage
  46. van Deth, J., "A Note on Measuring Political Participation in Comparative Research", Quality and Quantity, 20, pp.2~3 (1986)
  47. van Deth, J., "Comparative Politics: The Problem of Equivalence" (1998), Routledge
  48. van Roozendaal, P., "The Effect of Dominant and Central Parties on Cabinet Composition and Durability", Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17 (1992)
  49. Warwick, P., "Durability of Coalition Governments in Parliamentary Democracies", Comparative Political Studies, 11 (1979)
  50. Woldendorf, J., "Party Government in 48 Democracies: 1945-1998" (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  51. Vanhanen, T., "Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries" (1997), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)