본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공공외교로서의 한국의 대 중동이슬람사회 ODA 정책

Korean ODA Policy of Middle Eastern Islmic Society as Public Diplomacy

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

Public diplomacy is a kind of people's diplomacy, and means 'the communication with foreign publics to establish a dialogue designed to inform and influence.' ODA(Official Development Assistance) is one of the public diplomacy or multilateral diplomacy. In the 21st century we live together, cooperation among states and peoples to diminish the conflict and to promote the coexistence has been stressed more than ever. The tendency of the integration of world economy and rapid progress of information and communication technology have not only led deeper interdependence of world community over the whole sectors like politics, economy, society and culture, but also brought about the globalization of the negative factors such as terrorism of international level, environmental problem and disease of global level, international crimes, and so on. These negative factors are a kind of non-traditional security, and we cannot resolve this human security with traditional method such as traditional and nuclear weapons and war ultimately. These phenomena mean that we all live in a kind of 'global village' together and also that we have to resolve these problems through cooperation. The foreign aid represented by ODA is one of the typical efforts to provide the human security. Today, soft power is also becoming more and more important power resources in international relations. Joseph Nye's opinion that the future of a nation would be decided by 'soft power' aroused the far-reaching sympathy, and now the 'non-material value' has been positioned to be the strong essential and persuasive realm more than anything else. Republic of Korea became not only one of some countries offering the donor from the country received enormous economic aid from the international community, but also get the opportunity to spread the soft power for the enhancement of the country's dignity at the same time. How to design and fulfill the Korea's national strategies for the 21st century and ODA policy as public diplomacy was become an important agenda in foreign policy. This article is the first one of 'Korean ODA Policy of Middle Eastern Islamic Society as Public Diplomacy' in Korea. So, this article is limited in the 'present state, the prospect, and strategy of Korean ODA policy.' In the case of 2011, ROK offered 0.14% of GNI(Gross National Income) as ODA, it is more increased rate in comparing with former years. And Korean government made plans more and more increase ODA, and will reach the destination of 0.25% of GNI to 2015. But this rate is only 1/5 of 0.7% that UN encourages. In general speaking, Korean ODA is centered in education, health-medical service, information and communications, administration system, environment-female, industry-energy, development of farming and fishing villages. And in the case of Middle East, Korean ODA is being decreased in total amount since 2001 Afghanistan war and 2003 America-Iraq war. In conclusion, Korea needs new ODA policy to the Middle East considering the Islamic society, and it has to be based on the humanitarian aid, North European type. We need building a 'Korean Model of ODA' that would be made with cooperation by not only public servant of government, but also area specialist, development NGOs, and so on.

Abstract

Public diplomacy is a kind of people's diplomacy, and means 'the communication with foreign publics to establish a dialogue designed to inform and influence.' ODA(Official Development Assistance) is one of the public diplomacy or multilateral diplomacy. In the 21st century we live together, cooperation among states and peoples to diminish the conflict and to promote the coexistence has been stressed more than ever. The tendency of the integration of world economy and rapid progress of information and communication technology have not only led deeper interdependence of world community over the whole sectors like politics, economy, society and culture, but also brought about the globalization of the negative factors such as terrorism of international level, environmental problem and disease of global level, international crimes, and so on. These negative factors are a kind of non-traditional security, and we cannot resolve this human security with traditional method such as traditional and nuclear weapons and war ultimately. These phenomena mean that we all live in a kind of 'global village' together and also that we have to resolve these problems through cooperation. The foreign aid represented by ODA is one of the typical efforts to provide the human security. Today, soft power is also becoming more and more important power resources in international relations. Joseph Nye's opinion that the future of a nation would be decided by 'soft power' aroused the far-reaching sympathy, and now the 'non-material value' has been positioned to be the strong essential and persuasive realm more than anything else. Republic of Korea became not only one of some countries offering the donor from the country received enormous economic aid from the international community, but also get the opportunity to spread the soft power for the enhancement of the country's dignity at the same time. How to design and fulfill the Korea's national strategies for the 21st century and ODA policy as public diplomacy was become an important agenda in foreign policy. This article is the first one of 'Korean ODA Policy of Middle Eastern Islamic Society as Public Diplomacy' in Korea. So, this article is limited in the 'present state, the prospect, and strategy of Korean ODA policy.' In the case of 2011, ROK offered 0.14% of GNI(Gross National Income) as ODA, it is more increased rate in comparing with former years. And Korean government made plans more and more increase ODA, and will reach the destination of 0.25% of GNI to 2015. But this rate is only 1/5 of 0.7% that UN encourages. In general speaking, Korean ODA is centered in education, health-medical service, information and communications, administration system, environment-female, industry-energy, development of farming and fishing villages. And in the case of Middle East, Korean ODA is being decreased in total amount since 2001 Afghanistan war and 2003 America-Iraq war. In conclusion, Korea needs new ODA policy to the Middle East considering the Islamic society, and it has to be based on the humanitarian aid, North European type. We need building a 'Korean Model of ODA' that would be made with cooperation by not only public servant of government, but also area specialist, development NGOs, and so on.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 강선주, "신정부의 기여외교 : 공적개발원조(ODA)의 과제와 전망, In 주요국제문제분석" (2008), 외교안보연구원
  2. 권율, "우리나라 대외원조정책의 선진화방안 : 국제개발협력 패러다임의 변화와 한국 ODA의 개혁과제" (2006), 대외경제정책연구원
  3. 김국진, "한국외교정책 방향과 우선순위, In 외교안보연구원 정책연구시리즈 2" (1998)
  4. 김성태, "우리나라 공적개발원조정책 방향 모색-공여선진국의 사례분석을 중심으로", 한국정책학회 동계학술대회발표논문 (2007)
  5. 김정호, "이라크 전후복구사업과 해외건설업의 대응방안", 국토연구원, 259, pp.98~104 (2003)
  6. 노상환, "국제비교를 통한 한국의 ODA 배분방향 분석", 국제지역연구, 13(2), pp.115~134 (2009), 국제지역연구센터
  7. 유호근, "신자유주의적 세계화 패러다임:비판적 검토와 대안적 전망", 아태연구, 16(1), pp.123~140 (2009), 국제지역연구원
  8. 유호근, "ODA, 공공외교: 한국의 21세기 국가전략", 한국세계지역학회 학술대회 (2010)
  9. 정상화, "국제관계 패러다임과 공적개발원조(ODA) 정체성(Rationale)의 변화", 한국국제정치학회 2011년도 국내학술회의, 한국의 다자외교와 공공외교 (2011)
  10. 2011년도 무상원조사업 수원국 만족도 조사 결과보고서, "한국국제협력단(KOICA)", ~ (2011)
  11. 한국국제협력단(KOICA), "국별 지원전략 및 지원사업" (2010), 이집트
  12. Alesina, Alberto, "Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?", Journal of Economic Growth, 5, pp.33~63 (1998)
  13. Alesina, Alberto, "Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?", Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1) (2000)
  14. Bearce, David H, "Foreign Aid Effectiveness and the Strategic Goals of Donor Governments", The Journal of Politics, 72(3), pp.837~851 (2010)
  15. Marijke, Breuning, "Words and Deeds: Foreign Assistance Rhetoric and Policy Behavior in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom", International Studies Quarterly, 39(2), pp.235~254 (1995)
  16. Brysk, Allison, "Global Good Samaritans : Human Rights as Foreign Policy" (2007), Oxford University Press
  17. Cooper, Andrew F, "Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War" (1997), Macmillan Press
  18. Eglstrom, Ole, "From Adaptation to Foreign Policy Activism: Sweden as a Promoter of Peace?, In Stable Peace Among Nations", pp.179~199 (2000), Rowman & Littlefield
  19. Global Aid Allocation: Are Nordic Donors Different?, "Gates, Scott", The Center for the Study of African Economies Working Paper Series, ~ (2004)
  20. Harms, Philipp, "Aid, governance, and private foreign investment", Economic Journal, 116(513) (2006)
  21. Hattori, Tomohisa, "The Moral Politics of Foreign Aid", Review of International Studies, 29(2), pp.229~247 (2003)
  22. Hook, Steven W, "National Interest and Foreign Aid" (1995), Lynne Rienner
  23. 정기웅, "Foreign Aid and Donor-Recipient Relations after Jakarta Commitment", 세계지역연구논총, 28(2), pp.97~119 (2010), 한국세계지역학회
  24. Kuisma, Mikko, "Social Democratic Internationalism and the Welfare State After the ‘Golden Age’", Cooperation and Conflict, 42(1), pp.9~26 (2007)
  25. Lancaster, carol, "Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics" (2007), The University of Chicago Press
  26. "The Report of the International Financial Institution Advisory Commission" (2010)[URL]
  27. Morgenthau, Hans J, "A Political Theory of Foreign Aid", American Political Science Review, 56(2), pp.301~309 (1962)
  28. Moyo, Dambisa, "Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is a Better Way for Africa" (2009), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  29. Neumayer, Eric, "The Pattern of Aid Giving" (2003), Routledge
  30. Nye. Jr. Joseph S, "Soft Power and American Foreign Policy", Political Science Quarterly, 119(2) (2004)
  31. Omoruyi, Leslie O, "Contending Theories on Development" (2001), Post-Cold war Evidence from Africa
  32. Opeskin, Brian R, "The Moral Foundations of Foreign Aid", World Development, 24(1), pp.21~44 (1996)
  33. Presented for UNPOG 2010, "Presented for UNPOG 2010", International Conference on “Good Governance for National Development, pp.17~18 (2010)
  34. Riddell, Roger C, "Does Foreign Aid Really Work?", Oxford University Press
  35. Rosenau, James N, "Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization" (2003), Princeton University Press
  36. Sevensson, Jacob, "Foreign aid and rent-seeking", Journal of International Economics, 51 (2000)
  37. Streeten, Paul, "Global Prospects in an Interdependent World", World Development, 19(1) (1991)
  38. Tarp, F, "Foreign Aid and Development : Lessons Learnt and Directions for the Future" (2000), Routledge
  39. Tewes, Henning, "The Emergence of a Civilian Power : Germany and Central Europe", German Politics, 6(2), pp.95~116 (1997)
  40. Woods, Ngaire, "The shifting politics of foreign aid", International Affairs, 81(2), pp.393~409 (2005)
  41. Woods, Nagire, "Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance", International Affairs, 84(6), pp.1205~1221 (2008)
  42. U.S. Department of State, "Dictionary of International Relations Terms", 85~ (1987)
  43. OECD DAC, "Peer Review, the United States, Paris", ~ (2003)
  44. "OECD DAC, 2004, Peer Review, Japan, Paris", ~
  45. "OECD DAC, 2005, Peer Review, Sweden. Paris", ~
  46. "OECD DAC, 2005, Peer Review, Norway, Paris", ~
  47. "OECD DAC, 2007, Peer Review, Denmark, Paris", ~
  48. "OECD DAC, 2008, Peer Review, France, Paris", ~
  49. [URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)