폐쇄적 전제정치(Closed Autocracy)가 전자정부개발(E-Government Development)에 미치는 영향 분석: 아랍 국가들을 중심으로
The Impact of Closed Autocracy on E-Government Development: Focusing on Arab Countries
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
세계적인 추세 중 하나인 전자정부개발이 아랍 국가들과도 무방하지 않은 것으로 보인다. 민주주의 국가에서 주도하던 전자정부개발이 전제정치를 채택하고 있는 아랍 국가들에서도 활발히 개발 중인 점이 고무적인 사실로 다가온다. 그러나 하향식 전달을 비롯한 전자정부의 일부 특성과 전자정부개발이 대내외적 합법성 취득에 유용하다는 점은 전자정부개발이 전제정치 국가들의 합법화 도구 중 하나로 개발될 수 있음을 시사한다. 특히, 선거 전제정치보다 합법성이 부족한 폐쇄적 선거정치가 전자정부개발에 더욱 유의미한 영향을 미칠 것이라는 논리적 추론이 가능하다. 본 연구는 폐쇄적 전제정치의 아랍 국가들이 더욱 높은 전자정부개발을 형성해 나가고 있다는 사실을 수치상으로 제시하고 선거 전제정치와 폐쇄적 전제정치로 양분화되는 아랍 21개국을 대상으로 패널 자료들을 구축하였다. 이를 검정 결과 가장 적합한 모형으로 나타난 합동OLS를 적용하여 폐쇄적 전제정치가 전자정부개발에 유의미한 효과를 미치고 있다는 결과를 도출하였다.
Abstract
The phenomenon of Arab countries adopting autocracy in e-government development is an interesting case compared to the narrative of e-government development led by democratic countries. However, some characteristics of e-government, including top-down delivery, and the fact that e-government development is useful for acquiring internal and external legitimacy, suggest that e-government can be developed as one of the tools for legitimization in autocratic countries. In particular, it can be logically inferred that closed autocratic countries, which lack legitimacy compared with democracies, will have a more significant impact on e-government development. By using panel data and pooled OLS, this study suggests the significant results that closed autocracy positively affects e-government development.
참고문헌 (33)
- 문창웅, "신뢰수준이 경제적 규제 강도에 미치는 영향: 정부신뢰와 시장신뢰의 차이", 융합사회와 공공정책, 15(2), pp.142~181 (2021), 융합사회연구소
- 서정민, "탈레반, 미진한 국민국가 형성, 그리고 아프가니스탄 정치 불안정", 한국이슬람학회논총, 31(3), pp.83~110 (2021), 한국이슬람학회
- 신다윗, "국방지출 결정요인에 관한 연구: 민주적 책임성과 정부안정성 중심으로", 국정관리연구, 14(3), pp.23~50 (2019), 성균관대학교 국정전문대학원[DOI]
- Amagoh, Francis, "Determinants of E-Government Diffusion in Nigeria: An Examination of Theoretical Models", Information Development, 32(4), pp.1137~1154 (2016)
- Bhuiyan, Shahjahan H., "E-government in Kazakhstan:Challenges and Its Role to Development", Public Organization Review, 10(1), pp.31~47 (2010)
- Chen, Lijun, "Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use", International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), pp.850~865 (2020)
- Cho, Beomgeun, "Whom Do We Learn from? The Impact of Global Networks and Political Regime Types on E-Government Development", International Public Management Journal, pp.1~21 (2022)
- Dias, Gonçalo Paiva, "Global E-Government Development:Besides the Relative Wealth of Countries, Do Policies Matter?", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(3), pp.381~400 (2020)
- Dukalskis, Alexander, "Justifying Dictatorship", pp.1~18 (2018), Routledge
- Guriev, Sergei, "A theory of informational autocracy", Journal of public economics, 186, pp.1~11 (2020)
- Marc., "Stages and Determinants of E-Government Development: A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Global Cities", International Public Management Journal, 23(6), pp.731~769 (2020)
- Kabanov, Yury, "Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia", pp.184~194 (2020), Springer International Publishing
- Kalkamanova, Assem, "E-Governance Development as a Legitimation Strategy: A Content Analysis", Казахстан-Спектр, 100(4), pp.34~51 (2021)
- Kneuer, Marianne, "Diffusion of E‐Government and E‐Participation in Democracies and Autocracies", Global Policy, 7(4), pp.548~556 (2016)
- Jaeger, Paul T., "Deliberative Democracy and the Conceptual Foundations of Electronic Government", Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), pp.702~719 (2005)
- Johnson, Erica, "E-Government and Transparency in Authoritarian Regimes: Comparison of National-and City-Level E-Government Web Sites in Central Asia", Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media, 3(3), pp.15~48 (2010)
- Maerz, Seraphine F., "The Electronic Face of Authoritarianism:E-Government as a Tool for Gaining Legitimacy in Competitive and non-Competitive Regimes", Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), pp.727~735 (2016)
- Salmerón Gómez, Roman, "Collinearity Diagnostic Applied in Ridge Estimation through the Variance Inflation Factor", Journal of Applied Statistics, 43(10), pp.1831~1849 (2016)
- Singh, Harminder, "Country-Level Determinants of E-government Maturity", Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20(1), pp.1~16 (2007)
- Stier, Sebastian, "Political determinants of E-Government Performance Revisited : Comparing Democracies and Autocracies", Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), pp.270~278 (2015)
- Zhao, Fang, "Effects of National Culture on E-Government Diffusion—A Global Study of 55 Countries", Information & Management, 51(8), pp.1005~1016 (2014)
- "Covid-19 Pandemic Timeline Fast Facts" (2023)[URL]
- "Benchmarking E-government: A Globbal perspective, United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration & American Society for Public Administration" (2002)[URL]
- "World Development Indicators"[URL]
- "Worldwide Governance Indicators"[URL]
- "United Nations E-Government Survey 2018:Gearing E-Government to Support Transformation towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies" (2018)[URL]
- "United Nations E-Government Survey 2022:The Future of Digital Government" (2022)[URL]
- "United Nations E-Government Knowledgebase Overview"[URL]
- "E-Government Development Index (EGDI)"[URL]
- "Country Data"[URL]
- "The Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset" (2015)[URL]
- "Reference Documents"[URL]
- "Arab Countries / Arab League Countries 2023"[URL]