본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전자정부와 부패의 관계에 관한 실증연구:정책결정 투명성을 중심으로

Empirical Study on E-government and Corruption: Transparency as a Key Moderator

정광호|최슬기
한국지역정보화학회 (The Korean Association For Regional Information Society)|2014.06|한국지역정보화학회지 (JOURNAL OF KOREAN ASSOCIATION FOR REGIONAL INFORMATION SOCIETY)|제17권 제2호|pp. 29-59|DOI 10.22896/karis.2014.17.2.002

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

투명성조절효과TransparencyCorruption부패전자정부E-governmentModerator

초록

전자정부는 일반적으로 부패를 통제하는 정책수단의 하나로 인식되면서 양자의 연관성에 대한 연구들이 축적되어 왔지만, 과연 어떤 과정을 거쳐 전자정부가 부패를 억제하는가에 대한 연구는 아직 드물다. 이에 본 연구는 전자정부가 부패에 미치는 영향이 정책투명성에 따라 어떻게 달라지는가를 국가차원의 자료를 중심으로 실증분석해 보고자 한다. 본 연구는 119개국의 2008년과 2010년 자료를 이용하여 전자정부가 부패에 미치는 영향이 정책결정의 투명성에 따라 달라짐을 검증하고자 한다. 본 연구의 분석결과에 따르면 정책결정의 투명성은 전자정부의 반부패효과에 있어 통계적으로 유의미한 조절변수로 나타났고, 정책결정의 투명성이 높을수록 전자정부의 반부패효과도 높게 나왔다. 본 연구의 시사점으로 전자정부의 반부패효과는 제도설비와 관리방식의 개혁에 따라 달라짐을 강조하였다.

Abstract

E-Government is widely known as a tool of anti-corruption. There is, however, little empirical research analyzing transparency as a condition for achieving anti-corruption effect. This paper examines whether the anti-corruption effect of e-government could vary based on each country’s transparency level. Research method includes analysis of variance, graphical analysis, and regression, using panel data(i=119, t=2). Statistical analysis reveals that transparency in policy making plays a critical role of moderator in the relationship between e-government and corruption. Anti-corruption effect of e-government increases with each country’s transparency level. This result can remind us the importance of building transparency in government as a key success factor of e-government, anti-corruption strategy.

참고문헌 (88)

  1. 김영평, "서울시 OPEN 시스템의 효과성에 대한 연구", 한국행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집, pp.355~369 (2001)
  2. 김태은, "전자정부가 부패에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 횡단 및 패널자료를 통한 증거", 한국행정학보, 42(1), pp.293~321 (2008), 한국행정학회
  3. 남궁근, "전자정부를 통한 부패통제-이론과 사례" (2002), 한울 아카데미
  4. 목진휴, "전자정부를 통한 행정부패 감소방안:정보통신기술(ICT)을 통한레드테이프의 제거방안을 중심으로", 정보화정책, 9(3), pp.3~17 (2002), 한국정보화진흥원
  5. 박흥식, "투명성 가치: 개념적 구조와 의미", 한국사회와 행정연구, 12(3), pp.103~118 (2001)
  6. 사공영호, "재량권, 지대 그리고 부패: 토지？건축분야를 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 11(4), pp.75~98 (2002), 한국정책학회
  7. 송희준, "전자정부사업의 행정투명성 제고효과 분석", 행정논총, 40(4), pp.5~134 (2002), 한국행정연구소
  8. 왕재선, "전자정부의 효과: 거버넌스 지표를 중심으로", 행정논총, 51(4), pp.1~29 (2013), 한국행정연구소
  9. 최영훈, "정보기술, 레드테이프 그리고 부패의 관계성: 업무분야를 중심으로 한 탐색적 고찰", 한국부패학회보, 8(1), pp.1~28 (2003), 한국부패학회
  10. 최영훈, "우리나라 전자정부의 부패취약성에 관한 탐색적 고찰", 사이버커뮤니케이션 학보, 11, pp.147~180 (2003)
  11. 최진욱, "서울특별시 OPEN 시스템이 부패에 미치는 영향", 정부학연구, 13(1), pp.215~240 (2007), 정부학연구소
  12. Accenture., "eGovernment Leadership: Realizing the Vision" (2002), Accenture
  13. Alam, M. S., "Some economic costs of corruption in LCDs", The Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(4), pp.441~456 (1990)
  14. Ali, A. M., "Determinants of economic corruption: a cross-country comparison", Cato Journal, 22(3), pp.449~466 (2002)
  15. Andersen, T. B., "E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy", Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), pp.201~210 (2009)
  16. Argyris, C., "Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness" (1974), Jossey Bass
  17. Bac, M., "Corruption, connections and transparency: Does a better screen imply a better scene?", Public Choice, 107(1), pp.87~96 (2001)
  18. Baltagi, B., "Econometric Analysis of Panel Data" (2001), Wiley
  19. Baron, R. M., "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)
  20. Beck, N., "Throwing out the baby with the bath water: A comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon", International Organization, 55(2), pp.487~495 (2001)
  21. Becker, G. S., "Crime and punishment: An economic approach", Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), pp.169~217 (1968)
  22. Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications, "Bellver, A.", World Bank Policy, ~ (2005)
  23. Bertot, J. C., "Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies", Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), pp.264~271 (2010)
  24. E-government and access to information, "Bhatnagar, S.", Global Corruption, 24~32 (2003)
  25. Bliss, C., "Does competition kill corruption", Journal of Political Economy, 105(5), pp.1001~1023 (1997)
  26. Bovens, M., "From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control", Public Administration Review, 62(2), pp.174~184 (2002)
  27. Broadman, H. G., "Seeds of corruption–do market institutions matter?", MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies, 11(4), pp.359~392 (2001)
  28. Brunetti, A., "A free press is bad news for corruption", Journal of Public Economics, 87(7), pp.1801~1824 (2003)
  29. Ciborra, C., "Interpreting e-Government and development efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance?", Information Technology and People, 18(3), pp.260~279 (2005)
  30. DiRienzo, C. E., "Corruption and the role of information", Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), pp.320~332 (2007)
  31. Djankov, S., "The regulation of entry", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), pp.1~37 (2002)
  32. Ebrahim. Z., "E-government adoption: Architecture and barriers", Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), pp.589~611 (2005)
  33. Etzioni, A., "Is transparency the best disinfectant?", The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, pp.389~404 (2010)
  34. Greene, W. H., "Econometric Analysis" (2003), Pearson Education India
  35. Localization and Corruption: Panacea or Pandora’s Box, "Gurgur, T.", World Bank Policy, ~, pp.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3486 (2005)
  36. Heald, D., "Variety of transparency" (2006), Oxford University Press:XIII
  37. Information Systems for Public Sector Management, "Heeks, R.", Institute for Development Policy and Management, ~ (1998)
  38. Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced?, "Heeks, R.", ~, pp.Paper no. 14 (2003)
  39. Herzfeld, T., "Corruption and legal (in)effectiveness: an empirical investigation", European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), pp.621~632 (2003)
  40. Hood, C., "Transparency" (2001), Routledge
  41. Hölmstrom, B., "Moral hazard and observability", The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, pp.74~91 (1979)
  42. Hsiao, C., "Analysis of Panel Data" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  43. eCorruption: eCrime Vulnerabilities in the NSW Public Sector, "ICAC.", ICAC, ~ (2001)
  44. Kim, S., "An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN", Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), pp.42~50 (2009)
  45. Klitgaard, R., "Controlling Corruption" (1988), Univ of California Press
  46. Knack, S., "Trade intensity, country size and corruption", Economics of Governance, 4(1), pp.1~18 (2003)
  47. Kraemer, K. L., "Computing and public organizations", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), pp.89~112 (1997)
  48. Kunicova, J., "Electoral rules and constitutional structures as constraints on corruption", British Journal of Political Science, 35(4), pp.573~ (2005)
  49. Laffont, J. J., "Separation of powers and development", Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), pp.129~145 (2001)
  50. Lambsdorff, J. G., "Measuring Corruption: The Validity and Precision of Subjective Indicators", pp.81~100 (2006), Measuring corruption
  51. Lederman, D., "Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter", Economics and Politics, 17(1), pp.1~35 (2005)
  52. Linz, J., "The virtues of parliamentarism", Journal of Democracy, 1, pp.84~92 (1990)
  53. Linz, J., "Toward consolidated democracies", Journal of Democracy, 7, pp.14~33 (1996)
  54. Lio, M. C., "Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models", Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), pp.47~53 (2011)
  55. Miller, G. J., "The political evolution of principal-agent models", Annual Review of Political Science, 8, pp.203~225 (2005)
  56. Moon, M. J., "Can IT help government to restore public trust?: Declining public trust and potential prospects of IT in the public sector", Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2003)
  57. Nas, T. F., "A policy-oriented theory of corruption", The American Political Science Review, 80(1), pp.107~119 (1986)
  58. Ndou, V. D., "E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges", The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), pp.1~24 (2004)
  59. OECD., "The E-governance imperative: Main findings" (2003), OECD
  60. Park, H., "Determinants of corruption: A cross-national analysis", Multinational Business Review, 11(2), pp.29~48 (2003)
  61. Peterson, S. B., "Saints, demons, wizards and Systems: Why information technology reforms fail or underperform in public bureaucracies in Africa", Public Administration and Development, 18(1), pp.37~60 (1998)
  62. Plümper, T., "Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects", Political Analysis, 15(2), pp.124~139 (2007)
  63. Pollitt, C., "Clarifying Convergence: Striking Similarities and Durable Differences in Public Management Reform", Public Management Review, 3, pp.471~492 (2001)
  64. Rainey, H. G., "Understanding and Managing Public Organizations" (1998), Jossey-Bass
  65. Ramasoota, P., "Information technology and bureaucratic surveillance: a case study of the Population Information Network (PIN) in Thailand", Information Technology for Development, 8(1), pp.51~64 (1998)
  66. Rauch, J. E., "Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries", Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), pp.49~71 (2000)
  67. "Ethnolinguistic Fractionalization (ELF) Indices, 1961 and 1985" (2001)[URL]
  68. Rose-Ackerman, S., "Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  69. Seldadyo, H., "The determinants of corruption: A literature survey and new evidence", Paper presented at the EPCS Conference (2006)
  70. Shim, D. C., "E-Government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data", International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), pp.298~316 (2008)
  71. Svensson, J., "Eight questions about corruption", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), pp.19~42 (2005)
  72. Thompson, J., "Organization in Action" (1967), McGraw-Hill
  73. Corruption Perception Index 2011, "Trasnparency International", ~ (2011)
  74. Treisman, D., "The causes of corruption: a cross-national study", Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), pp.399~457 (2000)
  75. Tackling corruption, transforming lives: accelerating human development in Asia and the Pacific, "UNDP.", The Asia Pacific Human Development Report Unit of the United Nations Development Programme, ~ (2008)
  76. Welch, E. W., "Global information technology pressure and government accountability: the mediating effect of domestic context on website openness", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), pp.509~538 (2001)
  77. Wenger J. B., "At the discretion of rogue agents: How automation improves women’s outcomes in unemployment insurance", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), pp.313~333 (2009)
  78. Wescott, C., "E-government to combat corruption in the Asia Pacific Region", The 11th International Anti-corruption Conference (2003)
  79. West, D. M., "E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes", Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp.15~27 (2004)
  80. Wong, W., "Does E-Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability", Governance, 17(2), pp.275~297 (2004)
  81. Woodridge, J. M., "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data" (2002), MIT Press
  82. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019-2010, "World Economic Forum", ~ (2010)
  83. The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012, "World Economic Forum(WEF)", ~ (2012)
  84. "Transparency International"[URL]
  85. "UN E-Government Development Database"[URL]
  86. "IMF World Economic Outlook Database"[URL]
  87. "World Governance Indicator"[URL]
  88. "CIA World Factbook"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

전자정부와 부패: 국가단위 분석을 중심으로최진욱성균관대학교 국정전문대학원 · 국정관리연구2014 · 제9권 제1호전자정부 발전의 매개효과와 국가부패감소 영향요인 연구: 국가단위 분석을 중심으로김진하, 이강원, 이정호, 정미진국가정책연구소 · 국가정책연구2017 · 제31권 제3호국가정보화 수준이 부패에 미치는 영향: 多국가 비교분석을 중심으로문정욱한국지역정보화학회 · 한국지역정보화학회지2015 · 제18권 제1호국가의 정보화 수준과 투명성의 영향 관계:잠재성장모형을 중심으로김구한국지역정보화학회 · 한국지역정보화학회지2015 · 제18권 제3호전자정부와 정부신뢰의 관계에 관한 연구윤상오한국지역정보화학회 · 한국지역정보화학회지2015 · 제18권 제4호전자정부가 공공데이터 개방의 성과에 미치는 영향: 사회･제도적 조절변수를 중심으로황주성한국지역정보화학회 · 한국지역정보화학회지2015 · 제18권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

정부 3.0 추진에 따른 공공데이터 개방과 지방정부의 방향성 모색: 공공데이터법에 관한 이해와 개방 사례를 중심으로황성수, 송효진pp. 1-28한국에서 정보격차와 사회적 배제의 관계에 관한 탐색적 비교 분석김구pp. 61-88우리나라 복지정보화 수준진단 및 정책방향: 전문가의 시각을 중심으로김기환, 노승용, 윤상오pp. 89-115환경과 정책 변화에 따른 정책논리의 재구성: 공공부문 스마트워크센터 정책을 중심으로정혜수, 김학진, 이삼열pp. 117-145정부운영 패러다임과 정보공개 패러다임의 상응성에 관한 연구이재완pp. 147-172
원문 보기