사회적 고립청년 지원 조례에 관한 비교 연구

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to derive an ordinance amendment plan for isolated youth through comparative analysis of local government ordinances. To this end, the ‘Ordinances on Support for Socially Isolated Youth’ of 13 local governments across the country were compared by using data from the National Law Information Center’s autonomous law system. As an analytical framework for comparison of ordinances, the right(the purpose of the ordinance, the accountability of the head of a local government), the universalism of allocation, the comprehensiveness of benefits in the normative validity, and the financial responsibility of the head of a local government and accountability and integration of the delivery system and professionalism of manpower in the normative effectiveness, were utilized. As a result of the analysis, overall, the ordinances of Seoul were the most suitable for ideal content system of social welfare ordinance. Each local government needs to benchmark the ordinances of Seoul according to the situation of each local government. As a legal discussion based on the analysis results, new regulations on civil rights, change of voluntary regulations to compulsory regulations in the accountability and the financial responsibility of the head, comprehensive regulations in the responsibilities of local government heads, establishment of basic plans, and types of support programs, deletion of spontaneity(self￾isolated youth) in benefit qualifications. Through this study, it is expected that social interest in the lives of socially isolated youth will be enhanced and comparative research on social welfare ordinances will be activated.