사건과 변용의 신론 모색 ― 들뢰즈와 안병무의 비인격적 주체성과 관련하여

Abstract

Through ‘Body Without Organs’ and ‘Becoming,’ which are the two concepts that represent post-structuralist thinker Gilles Deleuze’s ontology, and through the ‘Event’ of Minjung theologian Ahn Byung-Mu, this paper attempts to ontologically explain about “God without organs” who is manifested by being materialized in concrete immanence. Deleuze’s ontology criticizes the limitation of ‘ontology of being’ based on the West’s substance philosophy that continues from Platonism, which was his philosophical problem awareness. And its alternative begins from ‘ontology of becoming’ of the event and affection that are focused on intrinsic occurrence. What is ontologically important to Deleuze is not about following the root and the source of beings. He brings affection on the horizon called becoming and pays attention to the arrangement among the beings of affection. Thus, the purpose of Deleuze’s ontology is not in the composition of a coordinated system. Rather, for him, ontology is to lay the foundation of practical philosophy that can escape from organisms that produce oppression and elimination. Ahn Byung-Mu also turns his back on the character and essentialism of the traditional Western theology in order to theologize the existence of historical Jesus and focuses on impersonal subjectivity called ‘event.’ While he ontologically applies the event to historical Jesus, minjung and the reality faced by minjung, he preaches from the position of political theology that the place where the minjung event takes place is where historical Jesus exists. Likewise, impersonal subjectivity called ‘event’ and ‘affection’ of Ahn Byung-Mu and Deleuze put forward two clear opinions on the existing methods of God. ‘Body without organs’ and ‘becoming’ of Deleuze offer a theory on the ontological state of potential God. In addition, the ‘event’ of Ahn Byung-Mu provides a theory on what characteristics are shown when the potential God is materialized and revealed. The doctrine of God that concentrates on the intrinsic affection of God says that God already always potentially exists in the midst of symbolic order where oppression and elimination occur and can put forward an opinion that God is incidentally revealed as the aspect of minority/minjung. Furthermore, the doctrine of God of the event and affection frees from religious contemplation that pursues unity with God and can lay the political theology foundation that enables a conversion into a new ethical and practical direction called unity with excluded neighbors whom God is existing with.