论≪论语≫中“仁”与“智”的关系
Detailed analysis of the relationship between ren and wisdom in The Analects
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
人们时常认为, 仁须以智为前提, 这是对仁智关系的一大误读｡ 从逻辑上讲, 仁与智是相互独立的, 仁不以智为前提, 智也不以仁为前提｡ 但就现实实际而言, 仁与智却又相参相杂而不能完全独立｡ 孔子主张仁智相兼相辅, 仁且智是孔子的理想, 但在价值取向上, 仁仍然要优先于智, 如果仁智不能相兼, 宁舍智而取仁｡ 孔子仁先于智的价值导向使人的价值的实现具有了平等性和自主性, 这种价值导向对于当代人的价值观的塑造仍有积极意义｡
Abstract
People have often thought that ren must be based on wisdom. This is a misreading of the relationship between ren and wisdom. Logically speaking, ren and wisdom are independent of each other, ren is not based on wisdom, and wisdom is not based on ren. However, on reality, ren and wisdom is always blend with each other and can not be completely independent. Confucius advocated ren associated with wisdom, however, on the value orientation, ren is prior to wisdom. This value orientation ensures the equality and autonomy of the realization of human value, which still has a positive meaning to the values-molding of contemporary people.
참고문헌 (7)
- 马振, "人道：孔子的哲学思想", pp.118~ (1993), 中国社会科学出版社
- 阮元, "揅经室集", pp.179~ (1993), 中华书局
- 唐君毅, "中国哲学原论·原道篇(上册)", pp.99~ (2006), 中国社会科学出版社
- 杨国荣, "善的历程：儒家价值体系研究", pp.33~34 (2006), 上海人民出版社
- 钱穆, "论语新解", pp.93~ (2002), 生活·读书·新知三联书店
- 王充, "黄晖撰.论衡校释", pp.408~ (1990), 中华书局
- 王守仁, "吴光等编校.王阳明全集", pp.36~ (2011), 上海古籍出版社