也谈《论语》中的“人”与“民”
A Study on ‘Ren (Slave-Owner Class)’ and ‘Min(Slave Class)’ in The Analects of Confucius
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
New Detection on The Analects of Confucius by Zhao Ji-Bin is an influential work in the field of Chinese philosophical history. The first article the Analysis of Ren and Min served as a foundation of his theory. In that article, Ren and Min in The Analects of Confucius were interpreted respectively as slave-owner class and slave class. This thesis argues differently. According to corpus from Zuo-Zhuan,which was finished at the same age of The Analects of Confucius, following conclusions can be made:1. Noblemen were also categorized as Min; 2. Instead of mutual excluded, Min and Ren are positively related; 3. Min could participate in sacrificial activities, attain salary and rank; 4. The semantic difference between Ren and Min is that Ren often indicates single person but Min a group of people. Based on their semantic difference, they differed from each other in collocating with verb; but that difference can not necessarily support Zhao’s conclusion.
Abstract
New Detection on The Analects of Confucius by Zhao Ji-Bin is an influential work in the field of Chinese philosophical history. The first article the Analysis of Ren and Min served as a foundation of his theory. In that article, Ren and Min in The Analects of Confucius were interpreted respectively as slave-owner class and slave class. This thesis argues differently. According to corpus from Zuo-Zhuan,which was finished at the same age of The Analects of Confucius, following conclusions can be made:1. Noblemen were also categorized as Min; 2. Instead of mutual excluded, Min and Ren are positively related; 3. Min could participate in sacrificial activities, attain salary and rank; 4. The semantic difference between Ren and Min is that Ren often indicates single person but Min a group of people. Based on their semantic difference, they differed from each other in collocating with verb; but that difference can not necessarily support Zhao’s conclusion.
참고문헌 (8)
- 王念孙, "读书杂志" (2000), 江苏古籍出版社
- 王引之, "经义述闻" (2000), 江苏古籍出版社
- 王引之, "经传释词" (1984), 岳麓书社
- 杨树达, "训诂学小史, In 积微居小学述林全编" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
- 杨树达, "中国文法学小史, In 积微居小学述林全编" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
- 王力, "训诂学上的一些问题, In 谈谈学习古代汉语" (1984), 山东教育出版社
- 蒋绍愚, "古汉语词汇纲要" (1989), 北京大学出版社
- 郭锡良, "汉语史论集（增补本）" (2005), 商务印书馆