코퍼스기반 통역 연구에서의 보편소 현상
Analysis on universal elements in Corpus-based interpretation studies
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is an analysis of the interface system on the results of simultaneous interpretation tests by the Graduate School of Translation. In the simultaneous translation test from Korean to Chinese, the use of conjunction in students' translations was compared with the non-interpreted comparison corpus in Chinese. Results on the research questions showed that the sentence length of the interpretation was shorter than that of the comparison corpus, and the vocabulary density of the interpretation was lower than that of the comparison corpus. And the number of conjunction used in the interpretation corpus was higher than that of the comparison corpus. Through the simultaneous interpretation test, students can see that the method of interpretation that they choose shows the universal character of Simplification and clarification, which Baker suggested. In other words, students did not use a relatively diverse vocabulary when interpreting, the number of words was smaller, and they tended to make a large number of sentences by short compositions. Finally, it was statistically confirmed that the usage patterns of the conjunction between the interpreters and the comparators were different. The above conclusion indicates that it is related to Simplification specification among the universal elements of translation.
Abstract
This study is an analysis of the interface system on the results of simultaneous interpretation tests by the Graduate School of Translation. In the simultaneous translation test from Korean to Chinese, the use of conjunction in students' translations was compared with the non-interpreted comparison corpus in Chinese. Results on the research questions showed that the sentence length of the interpretation was shorter than that of the comparison corpus, and the vocabulary density of the interpretation was lower than that of the comparison corpus. And the number of conjunction used in the interpretation corpus was higher than that of the comparison corpus. Through the simultaneous interpretation test, students can see that the method of interpretation that they choose shows the universal character of Simplification and clarification, which Baker suggested. In other words, students did not use a relatively diverse vocabulary when interpreting, the number of words was smaller, and they tended to make a large number of sentences by short compositions. Finally, it was statistically confirmed that the usage patterns of the conjunction between the interpreters and the comparators were different. The above conclusion indicates that it is related to Simplification specification among the universal elements of translation.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김정우, "번역 보편소의 한 사례- 텍스트 유형에 따른 명시화의 차이를 중심으로", 한국학연구, (53), pp.29~48 (2015), 한국학연구소[DOI]
- 김혜림, "한중 번역의 단순화와 명시화 연구 ― 신문사설 코퍼스를 중심으로 ―", 통번역학연구, 18(3), pp.237~262 (2014), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이창수, "영한 번역 코퍼스를 활용한 단순화 및 균일화 보편소 연구", 통번역학연구, 17(3), pp.341~358 (2013), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이창수, "코퍼스 기반 번역연구(CTS) 방법론", 통역과 번역, 15(1), pp.99~124 (2013), 한국통역번역학회
- 장현주, "중-한 번역의 논리 연결 연구 : 비명시적 논리 연결의 명시화를 중심으로", 박사, 중국어학, pp.2006
- 진염민, "유표성과 한국어 접속표지 습득 -중국인 초급 한국어 학습자 대상으로-", 어문론집, 56, pp.513~537 (2013), 중앙어문학회
- 최희경, "IT 뉴스 영한 번역에 나타난 영어의 영향", 통번역학연구, 16(2), pp.261~291 (2012), 통번역연구소
- 최희경, "코퍼스 분석에 기반한 한국어 기사문 번역과 비번역의 문체 비교 연구", 통역과 번역, 18(1), pp.231~255 (2016), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 郝玉榮羅, "國內語料庫翻譯研究現狀綜述", 隴東學院學報, 21(4), pp.30~32 (2010)
- 黃立波, "翻譯普遍性研究反思", 中國翻譯, 27(5), pp.55~60 (2006)
- 胡開寶, "基於語料庫的莎劇哈姆雷特漢譯文本中顯化現象及其動因研究", 外語研究, 2, pp.75~80 (2008)
- 胡顯耀, "用語料庫研究翻譯普遍性", 解放軍外國語學院學報, 28(3), pp.45~48 (2005)
- 余國良, "語料庫對翻譯研究的促進作用", 外國語文, 26(2), pp.117~121 (2010)
- 周小玲, "基於語料庫的翻譯研究方法評析", 湘潭大學學報, 32(4), pp.155~157 (2008)
- 朱薇, "<紅樓夢>英譯本中的顯化特征", 南京航空大學學報, 13(4), pp.72~76 (2011)
- Baker, M., "Text and technology: in honour of John Sinclair", pp.233~250 (1993), John Benjamins
- Baker, M., "Teminology, LSP and Tranlation: Studies in Language Engineering in Honour of Juan C. Sager", pp.175~186 (1996), John Benjamins
- Frawley, W., "linguistic and philosophical perspectives", pp.159~175 (1984), Associated University Press
- Halliday, M., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
- Kenny, D., "Lexis and Creativity in Translation. A Corpus-based Study" (2001), St. Jerome Publishing
- Vinay, J.-P, "Comparative stylistics of French and English : a methodology for translation" (1995), John Benjamins
- Olohan, M., "Reporting that in translated English. Evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation?", Across Languages and Cultures, 1(2), pp.141~158 (2000)
- Puurtinen, T., "Translation Universals: Do They Exist?", pp.165~176 (2004), John Benjamins