법정 교호신문 통역 사례 연구- 중국어 사법통역 담화분석을 중심으로
Case Study on Cross-examination Judicial Interpretation: Focused on Discourse Analysis of Chinese Judicial Interpretation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study compares the mediation aspects of three interpreters at a cross-examination in criminal trial with the aim of observing how the different educational backgrounds of the interpreters affect the proceedings in trial. Judicial interpretation education programs were offered within the nation in a variety of ways due to awareness of the importance of judicial interpretation. Among the three interpreters, interpreter 1 and interpreter 2 had completed the judicial interpretation education program while interpreter 3 had not taken part in the said education program. The study conducts a discourse analysis to measure the mediation aspects of three interpreters during court interpreting. First, the number of questions asked are quantitatively analyzed to measure the intervention of the interpreter. Then factors such as ‘additional questions’, ‘use of third person’, ‘explanation’, ‘communicative coordination’ are considered for inductive deduction in order to measure the mediation aspect of the interpreter. As a result, it was confirmed that interpreter 3 was giving too many additional questions, thereby affecting the proceeding of the trial.
Abstract
This study compares the mediation aspects of three interpreters at a cross-examination in criminal trial with the aim of observing how the different educational backgrounds of the interpreters affect the proceedings in trial. Judicial interpretation education programs were offered within the nation in a variety of ways due to awareness of the importance of judicial interpretation. Among the three interpreters, interpreter 1 and interpreter 2 had completed the judicial interpretation education program while interpreter 3 had not taken part in the said education program. The study conducts a discourse analysis to measure the mediation aspects of three interpreters during court interpreting. First, the number of questions asked are quantitatively analyzed to measure the intervention of the interpreter. Then factors such as ‘additional questions’, ‘use of third person’, ‘explanation’, ‘communicative coordination’ are considered for inductive deduction in order to measure the mediation aspect of the interpreter. As a result, it was confirmed that interpreter 3 was giving too many additional questions, thereby affecting the proceeding of the trial.
참고문헌 (30)
- 강용택, "지리언어학 시각에서 본 중국 조선어방언 연구에 대한 생각", 중국조선어문, 5, pp.11~17 (2018)
- 김진아, "전문사법통역사에 대한 사회적 요구와 그에 따른 대책", 통번역학연구, 12(2), pp.125~144 (2009), 통번역연구소
- 증인신문 절차 및 기법에 관한 연구, "김주석", 대법원 사법정책연구원, ~ (2016)
- 정혜연, "법정통번역 교육", 번역학연구, 10(2), pp.181~206 (2009), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이원표, "담화분석" (2002), 한국문화사
- 이유진, "한국 형사재판 법정통역사의 역할 인식에 관한 연구: 중국어 통역 담화분석 및 통역사 면접조사를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2015
- 이유진, "중국어 통역사의 법정통역 규범 인식 연구 - 정확성 관련 규범을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 18(1), pp.103~130 (2016), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이유진, "한국 법정통역인의 사회적 역할에 관한 연구", 통역과 번역, 18, pp.111~136 (2016), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이유진, "사법통역 제도화에서 전문화로 - 사법통역인과 사법통역인 선정 담당자에 대한 설문조사를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 23(3), pp.117~148 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이지은, "사법인들과 통역인들의 사법통역 규범에 관한 인식 연구", 번역학연구, 12(3), pp.197~224 (2011), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이지은, "다문화사회의 사법통역" (2012), 집문당
- 이지은, "사법통역 교육에 관한 실행연구: 사법통역 전문가 기초과정 운영 사례", 번역학연구, 14(5), pp.195~223 (2013), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 법정통역인 인증제도의 실시 방안에 관한 연구, "이지은", 법원행정처, ~ (2018)
- 정철자, "국내 사법통번역 인증평가 사례연구: 윤리의식 평가 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 24(2), pp.203~227 (2020), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 홍서연, "국내 사법통역 교육의 현황 및 제언: 보고논문", 통번역학연구, 22(2), pp.207~231 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- Anderson, R., "Interpreting Studies Reader", pp.209~217 (1976), Routledge
- de Jongh, E. M., "An Introduction to Court Interpreting:Theory and practice" (1992), University Press of America
- Gonzalez, R. D., "Fundamentals of Court Interpretations: Theory, Policy and Practice" (1991), Carolina Academic Press
- Hale, S., "The Discourse of Court Interpreting" (2004), John Benjamins
- Hale, S., "Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting", pp.99~121 (2008), John Benjamins
- Heritage, J., "Talk in Action: Interacions, Identities, and Istitutions" (2010), Blackwell
- JCC, "Professional Standards and Ethics for California Court Interpreters", Judicial Council of California, 2013
- Laster, K., "Interpreters and the Legal System" (1994), The Federation Press
- Lee, J., "When linguistic and cultural differences are not disclosed in court interpreting", Multilingua, 28, pp.379~401 (2009)
- Liu, X., "Achieving accuracy in a bilingual courtroom : The effectiveness of specialized legal interpreter training", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 12(3), pp.299~321 (2018)
- Mason, I., "Triadic Exchanges: Studies in Dialogue Interpreting" (2001), St. Jerome
- Mikkelson, H., "Crossing borders in community interpreting", pp.81~97 (2008), John Benjamins
- "Code of ethics and professional responsibilities"[URL]
- Pöchhacker, F., "Cross Borders in Community Interpreting", pp.9~26 (2008), John Benjamins
- Wadensjö, C., "Interpreting as Interaction" (1998), Longman