난민재판 통역의 질에 대한 고찰: 통역인의 역할에 관한 사례연구를 중심으로
A Case Study of the Quality of Interpreting at Asylum Appeal Hearings: With a Focus on the Interpreters’ Interference with the Proceedings
2
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Inadequate interpreting services and the lack of interpreting in various languages during the interview of asylum seekers have been criticized,but interpreting services in the process of interviewing asylum seekers at the Ministry of Justice and the following appeal process at the Administrative Court have not been subject to investigation by interpreting researchers. This paper is a first attempt to examine the quality of interpreting during asylum appeal hearings in Korea based on the analysis of the discourse of court interpreting and courtroom observation. The findings indicate that interpreting, provided by untrained non-professional interpreters, often deviate from the norm of accurate and impartial interpreting, which is vital in legal interpreting. Based on such findings, this paper argues for the court and the judiciary to pay attention to the improvement of the quality of interpreting through interpreter training and proper legal interpreter system.
Abstract
Inadequate interpreting services and the lack of interpreting in various languages during the interview of asylum seekers have been criticized,but interpreting services in the process of interviewing asylum seekers at the Ministry of Justice and the following appeal process at the Administrative Court have not been subject to investigation by interpreting researchers. This paper is a first attempt to examine the quality of interpreting during asylum appeal hearings in Korea based on the analysis of the discourse of court interpreting and courtroom observation. The findings indicate that interpreting, provided by untrained non-professional interpreters, often deviate from the norm of accurate and impartial interpreting, which is vital in legal interpreting. Based on such findings, this paper argues for the court and the judiciary to pay attention to the improvement of the quality of interpreting through interpreter training and proper legal interpreter system.
참고문헌 (29)
- "한국의 난민 법과 제도에 관한 소고"[URL]
- 국내 난민 등 인권실태, "김종철", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2008)
- 김진아, "국내 법정통역 실태조사 및 해외사례 연구를통한 개선 방향 모색" (2008), 법원행정처
- "부실한 통역서비스는 ‘바벨탑의 저주’. 5월 뉴스레터기사" (2012)[URL]
- 서울행정법원, "난민재판에 대한 이해" (2011), 서울행정법원
- 이병렬, "한국이주정책의 성격과 전망", 경제와 사회, (90), pp.320~362 (2011), 비판사회학회
- 이지은, "다문화사회의 절차적 정의를 위한 사법통역", 집문당
- 장복희, "국제인권법에서 바라본 단일 난민법 제정의 의의", 저스티스, (110), pp.280~301 (2009), 한국법학원
- 정인섭, "한국의 난민 수용 실행과 문제점, In 난민의개념과 인정절차", pp.23~53 (2011), 경인문화사
- 차규근, "한국의 난민정책, In 난민의 개념과 인정절차", pp.3~22 (2011), 경인문화사
- 황필규, "난민지위협약상 공포의 의미, In 난민의 개념과 인정절차", pp.57~92 (2011), 경인문화사
- Barksy, R. F., "The interpreter and the Canadian convention refugee hearing: Crossing the potentially life-threatening boundaries between “coccode-e-eh,” “cluck-cluck,” and “cot-cot-cot”", TTR, 6(2), pp.131~156 (1993)
- Barnett, M., "Mind your language: Interpreters in Australian immigration proceedings", University of Western Sydney Law Review, 10, pp.109~138 (2006)
- Barsky, R., "The interpreter as intercultural agent in convention refugee hearings", The Translator, 2(1), pp.45~63 (1996)
- "Expressing a well-founded fear: Interpreting in convention refugee hearings" (2001)[URL]
- Good, A., "Anthropology and Expertise in the Asylum Courts" (2007), Routledge
- Hale, S., "Controversies over the role of the court interpreter, In Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting", pp.99~121 (2008), John Benjamins
- Relocations: Narratives of displacement, "The registration interview: Restricting refugees’ narrative performances, In Dislocation", pp.2005, Jacquemet, M.
- Jacquemet, M., "Crosstalk 2.0: asylum and communicative breakdowns", Text & Talk, 31(4), pp.475~497 (2011)
- Kalin, W., "Troubled Communication: Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings in the Asylum-Hearing", International Migration Review, 20(2), pp.230~241 (1986)
- Keselman, O., "“That is not necessary for you to know!”: Negotiation of participation status of unaccompanied children in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings", Interpreting, 12(1), pp.83~104 (2010)
- Kolb, W., "Interpreting in asylum appeal hearings, In Interpreting in Legal Settings", pp.26~50 (2008), Gallaudet University Press
- Lee, J., "When linguistic and cultural differences are not disclosed in court interpreting", MULTILINGUA-JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL AND INTERLANGUAGE COMMUNICATION, 28(4), pp.379~401 (2009), MOUTON DE GRUYTER
- 이지은, "A Case Study of an Untrained Interpreter’s Court Interpreting", 번역학연구, 11(1), pp.339~360 (2010), 한국번역학회
- Maryns, K., "Stylistic and thematic shifting as a narrative resource: Assessing asylum seekers’ repertoires", Multilingua, 20(1), pp.61~84 (2001)
- Maryns, K., "The Asylum Speaker: Language in the Belgian asylum procedure" (2006), St. Jerome
- Monnier, M.-A., "Field report: The hidden part of asylum seekers’ interviews in Geneva, Switzerland: Some observations about the socio-political construction of interviews between gatekeepers and the powerless", Journal of Refugee Studies, 8(3), pp.305~325 (1995)
- Pöllabauer S., "Interpreting in asylum hearings: Issues of role", responsibility and power Interpreting, 6(2), pp.143~180 (2004)
- UNHCR, "Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status" (1992), UNHCR