1880년대 전후 淸의 朝鮮 事務 처리 기제의 재확립
The Re-establishment of the Qing Dynasty’s Processing Mechanism for Chosŏn Affairs around 1880
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focused on how the Qing government dealt with Chosŏn affairs in the early 1880s from the perspective of operation of the related administrative system. Chosŏn affairs have always been an important part of Qing's foreign affairs. Since the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, the mechanism ‘the Ministry of Rites-Feng・Ji local authorities’ had been established to handle affairs such as tributes, envoys, trades and border issues related to Chosŏn. The Ministry of Rites played a central role as the hub of document processing in this mechanism, which operated in an orderly manner until the mid-19th century. After the middle of the 19th century, with the continuous invasion of the Chosŏn kingdom by Western powers, the newly established diplomatic organizations-Zongli Yamen and Beiyang superintendent-to respond to the treaty system first became involved in the handling of Chosŏn affairs in terms of diplomatic documents processing. Around year 1880, in the process of guiding the signing of treaties and commerce between Chosŏn and Western countries, as well as receiving the Yeongseonsa(領選使), the Beiyang superintendent gradually acquired the authority to exchange documents with the king of Chosŏn, and was recognized and valued by the Chosŏn side. The Qing Dynasty gradually established a mechanism for dealing with issues related to trade, treaties and other aspects of Chosŏn affairs through the ‘Zongli Yamen-Beiyang superintendent’ system, and the role of the mechanism was sufficiently exercised in the process of negotiating “Regulations for Maritime and Overland Trade between Chinese and Korean(1882)” with Chosŏn. However, when the regulations were put into effect, the ‘Zongli Yamen-Beiyang superintendent’ system overstepped its authority in matters such as envoys, ceremonies, and border affairs, and was opposed by the local authorities in the frontier regions and the Ministry of Rites. Finally, the two administration systems alleviated this contradiction by jointly participating in the enactment of follow-up chapters of the regulations and re-regulating the administrative operation mode of various affairs and the order of document movement. The processing mechanism for Chosŏn affairs during the late Qing Dynasty’s was manifested in the way of co-processing between the two administrative systems, i.e. the ‘Ministry of Rites-Feng・Ji local authorities’ and the ‘Zongli Yamen-Beiyang superintendent’.
Abstract
This paper focused on how the Qing government dealt with Chosŏn affairs in the early 1880s from the perspective of operation of the related administrative system. Chosŏn affairs have always been an important part of Qing's foreign affairs. Since the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, the mechanism ‘the Ministry of Rites-Feng・Ji local authorities’ had been established to handle affairs such as tributes, envoys, trades and border issues related to Chosŏn. The Ministry of Rites played a central role as the hub of document processing in this mechanism, which operated in an orderly manner until the mid-19th century. After the middle of the 19th century, with the continuous invasion of the Chosŏn kingdom by Western powers, the newly established diplomatic organizations-Zongli Yamen and Beiyang superintendent-to respond to the treaty system first became involved in the handling of Chosŏn affairs in terms of diplomatic documents processing. Around year 1880, in the process of guiding the signing of treaties and commerce between Chosŏn and Western countries, as well as receiving the Yeongseonsa(領選使), the Beiyang superintendent gradually acquired the authority to exchange documents with the king of Chosŏn, and was recognized and valued by the Chosŏn side. The Qing Dynasty gradually established a mechanism for dealing with issues related to trade, treaties and other aspects of Chosŏn affairs through the ‘Zongli Yamen-Beiyang superintendent’ system, and the role of the mechanism was sufficiently exercised in the process of negotiating “Regulations for Maritime and Overland Trade between Chinese and Korean(1882)” with Chosŏn. However, when the regulations were put into effect, the ‘Zongli Yamen-Beiyang superintendent’ system overstepped its authority in matters such as envoys, ceremonies, and border affairs, and was opposed by the local authorities in the frontier regions and the Ministry of Rites. Finally, the two administration systems alleviated this contradiction by jointly participating in the enactment of follow-up chapters of the regulations and re-regulating the administrative operation mode of various affairs and the order of document movement. The processing mechanism for Chosŏn affairs during the late Qing Dynasty’s was manifested in the way of co-processing between the two administrative systems, i.e. the ‘Ministry of Rites-Feng・Ji local authorities’ and the ‘Zongli Yamen-Beiyang superintendent’.
참고문헌 (46)
- "朝鮮王朝實錄"[URL]
- "同文匯考" (1978), 國史編纂委員會
- "魚允中全集" (1979), 亞細亞文化社
- "淸實錄"[URL]
- "大淸會典(康熙朝)(淸康熙年間刻本)", ~
- "大淸會典(雍正朝)(淸雍正年間刻本)", ~
- "大淸會典則例(乾隆朝)(文淵閣四庫全書本)", ~
- "籌辦夷務始末・同治朝" (2008), 中華書局
- "淸季中日韓關係史料" (1972), 中央硏究院近代史硏究所
- "淸季外交史料" (1987), 書目文獻出版社
- "淸光緒朝中日交涉史料" (1932), 故宮博物院
- "李鸿章全集" (2008), 安徽敎育出版社
- 王鐵崖, "中外舊約章彙編" (1957), 三聯書店
- 김종원, "조선후기 대외관계 연구" (2009), 한울
- 權錫奉, "淸末對朝鮮政策史硏究" (1986), 一潮閣
- 權赫秀, "근대 한중관계사의 재조명" (2007), 혜안
- 송병기, "近代韓中關係史硏究 : 19世紀末의 聯美論과 朝淸交涉" (1985), 檀大出版部
- 李善洪, "朝鮮的對明淸外交文書硏究" (2009), 吉林人民出版社
- 李文杰, "辨色視朝 : 晚淸的朝會・文書與政治決策" (2020), 上海人民出版社
- 吳福環, "淸季總理衙門硏究" (1995), 新疆大學出版社
- 徐望之, "公牘通論" (1947), 商務印書館
- 張存武, "淸代中韓關係論文集" (1987), 台灣商務印書館
- 張永江, "淸代藩部硏究——以政治變遷為中心" (2001), 黑龍江教育出版社
- 坂野正高, "近代中国政治外交史" (1973), 東京大学出版会
- 原田環, "朝鮮の開国と近代化" (1997), 溪水社
- 森萬佑子, "朝鮮外交の近代 : 宗属関係から大韓帝国へ" (2017), 名古屋大学出版会
- 岡本隆司, "属国と自主のあいだ : 近代淸韓関係と東アジアの命運" (2004), 名古屋大学出版会
- 酒井裕美, "開港期朝鮮の戦略的外交 : 1882-1884" (2016), 大阪大学出版会
- 權錫奉, "영선사행에 대한 일고찰", 역사학보, 17・18 (1962)
- 權錫奉, "李鴻章의 對朝鮮列國立約勸導策에 대하여", 역사학보, 21 (1963)
- 김창수, "조선・청 외교문서의 교섭경로와 성경의 역할", 역사와 현실, (107), pp.141~174 (2018), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
- 권혁수, "조공관계체제 속의 근대적 통상관계 : 『中國朝鮮商民水陸貿易章程』연구", 동북아역사논총, (28), pp.253~289 (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 김형종, "19세기 근대 한ㆍ중 관계의 변용― 자주와 독립의 사이 ―", 동양사학연구, (140), pp.223~270 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 손성욱, "‘外交’의 균열과 모색: 1860~70년대 淸·朝관계", 역사학보, (240), pp.525~570 (2018), 역사학회[DOI]
- 이동욱, "1840-1860년대 청조의 ‘속국’ 문제에 대한 대응", 중국근현대사연구, (86), pp.1~30 (2020), 중국근현대사학회[DOI]
- 이동욱, "1860년대 조선인의 러시아 유입과 總理各國事務衙門의 조선 사무 개입", 중국근현대사연구, (89), pp.1~23 (2021), 중국근현대사학회[DOI]
- 傅宗懋, "淸制論文集" (1977), 台灣商務印書館
- 姜博, "洋擾中的天朝 : 西方侵擾朝鮮與淸政府的應對", 석사, pp.2016
- 李動旭, "觀念與體制 : 中西語境互動中的淸廷對朝鮮政策演變(1843-1893)", 박사, pp.2018
- 李文杰, "總理衙門的奏摺流轉及其權力運作", 中華文史論叢, 2019(2) (2019)
- 王曉影, "近代轉型視野下的中朝關係——李鴻章與李裕元書信聯繫硏究", 史林, 2013(3) (2013)
- 王元崇, "明淸論叢 第八輯" (2008), 紫禁城出版社
- 秋月望, "朝中間の三貿易章程の締結經緯", 朝鮮学報, 115 (1985)
- 坂野正高, "総理衙門の設立過程", 近代中国硏究, (1) (1958)
- 崔蘭英, "一八八〇年代初頭における朝鮮の対淸交涉ー中国朝鮮商民水陸貿易章程の締結を中心に一", 朝鮮学報, 226 (2013)
- 荻恵里子, "近現代中国における社会経済制度の再編" (2016), 京都大学人文科学硏究所
