본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

메이지 일본의 콜레라 유행 통제와 피병원(避病院)의 제도화

Regulating the Cholera Epidemic and Institutionalizing Isolation Hospital (Hibyoin) in Meiji Japan

김영수
이화사학연구소 (Ewha Historical Institutions)|2023.06|이화사학연구 (EWHA SAHAK YEONGU)|제66호|pp. 49-80|DOI 10.37091/ewhist.2023..66.002

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

검역Institutionalization제도화Quarantine콜레라Cholera피병원전염병원자택요양Isolation HospitalRecuperation at home

초록

This paper aims to explore the disparity between the institutionalization and implementation of medical knowledge in the Meiji government's response to the cholera epidemic in the late 1870s, specifically focusing on the operation of the isolation hospital (Hibyoin). It looks like that the cholera epidemic in the late 1870s prompted the establishment of a series of fundamental laws regarding medical and sanitary practices, ostensibly aiming to create a legal framework based on modern Western medicine. However, the reality was quite different. One of the key preventive measures during the cholera epidemic was quarantine. However, the practice of isolating cholera patients in hospitals was only implemented for certain segments of the population, due to limited medical knowledge and widespread negative perceptions of isolation hospitals as typical quarantine spaces. Instead, measures such as traffic restrictions, cleanliness, disinfection, and adhering to a specific regimen were implemented for epidemic control. Shortly after the introduction of hospitals as medical care facilities for doctors to treat patients in the late 1860s, isolation hospitals, known as “Hibyoin,” were established as symbolic spaces for mandatory isolation. Although there was initially a negative perception about Hibyoin, these isolation hospitals eventually emerged as the primary medical institutions for patients with infectious diseases. This situation has changed significantly since the introduction of the 1897 Infectious Disease Prevention Act, whereby “Hibyoin” came to be referred to as “infectious disease hospitals” and were designated as legal institutions. Permanent infectious disease hospitals were established throughout the country based on the law. The institutionalization of permanent infectious disease hospitals demonstrates the political and societal consensus on the importance of such facilities for disease control. It reflects their transformation from a symbolic presence to a practical necessity based on real needs.

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the disparity between the institutionalization and implementation of medical knowledge in the Meiji government's response to the cholera epidemic in the late 1870s, specifically focusing on the operation of the isolation hospital (Hibyoin). It looks like that the cholera epidemic in the late 1870s prompted the establishment of a series of fundamental laws regarding medical and sanitary practices, ostensibly aiming to create a legal framework based on modern Western medicine. However, the reality was quite different. One of the key preventive measures during the cholera epidemic was quarantine. However, the practice of isolating cholera patients in hospitals was only implemented for certain segments of the population, due to limited medical knowledge and widespread negative perceptions of isolation hospitals as typical quarantine spaces. Instead, measures such as traffic restrictions, cleanliness, disinfection, and adhering to a specific regimen were implemented for epidemic control. Shortly after the introduction of hospitals as medical care facilities for doctors to treat patients in the late 1860s, isolation hospitals, known as “Hibyoin,” were established as symbolic spaces for mandatory isolation. Although there was initially a negative perception about Hibyoin, these isolation hospitals eventually emerged as the primary medical institutions for patients with infectious diseases. This situation has changed significantly since the introduction of the 1897 Infectious Disease Prevention Act, whereby “Hibyoin” came to be referred to as “infectious disease hospitals” and were designated as legal institutions. Permanent infectious disease hospitals were established throughout the country based on the law. The institutionalization of permanent infectious disease hospitals demonstrates the political and societal consensus on the importance of such facilities for disease control. It reflects their transformation from a symbolic presence to a practical necessity based on real needs.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. "｢第十三號 虎列剌病豫防規則之事｣,『外務省記錄』 3-11-4-4, ｢虎列剌病豫防法規施行關係書類｣", 外務省外交史料館, ~ (1877)
  2. "外入244 虎烈剌豫防規則設立の件外務省協議｣, JACAR(アジア歷史資料センター) Ref. C09112907200, 公文類纂 明治11年(1877) 前編卷43 本省公文 醫療部6止(", 防衛省防衛硏究所, ~ (1877)
  3. 加藤尙志, "檢疫の心得" (1879)
  4. 警視局, "警視類聚規則 坤" (1879), 警視局
  5. 關山直太郞, "近世日本人口の硏究" (1948), 龍吟社
  6. 內務省社寺局衛生局, "虎列剌豫防の諭解" (1880)
  7. 內海孝, "橫濱の疫病史-萬治病院の110年" (1988), 橫濱市衛生局
  8. 大嶽浩良, "栃木の流行り病傳染病感染症" (2021), 下野新聞社
  9. 渡邊則雄, "愛知縣の疫病史 : コレラ･天然痘･赤痢･ペスト" (1999), 現代企劃社
  10. 東京都立駒込病院, "駒込病院百年史" (1983), 東京都立駒込病院
  11. 鈴木則子, "江戶の流行り病-痲疹騷動はなぜ起こったのか" (2012), 吉川弘文館
  12. 山崎佐, "日本疫病史及防疫史" (1931), 克誠堂
  13. 山本俊一, "日本コレラ史" (1982), 東京大學出版會
  14. 生井常也, "現行衛生法規 上" (1884), 如泉堂
  15. 石黒忠悳, "虎烈剌論" (1871), 大學東校
  16. 小栗史朗, "地方衛生行政の創設過程" (1981), 醫療圖書出版社
  17. 小林丈廣, "近代日本と公衆衛生" (2001), 雄山閣出版
  18. 奧武則, "感染症と民衆" (2020), 平凡社新書
  19. 中金正衡, "傳染病豫防法心得書演解" (1880), 慶應義塾出版社
  20. 靑木歲幸他, "天然痘との鬪い-九州の種痘" (2018), 岩田書院
  21. 草野肇, "官民必携規則提要" (1880), 江島伊兵衛
  22. 香西豊子, "種痘という<衛生> : 近世日本における豫防接種の歷史" (2019), 東京大學出版會
  23. 厚生省醫務局, "醫制八十年史" (1955), 印刷局朝陽會
  24. 厚生省醫務局, "醫制百年史 資料編" (1977), ぎょうせい
  25. 厚生省, "檢疫制度百年史" (1980), ぎょうせい
  26. J. C. ヘボン, "和英語林集成" (1886)
  27. ヘンリー･ハルツホールン, "内科摘要(華氏)巻之16" (1875), 島村利助
  28. ヤン･ジャネッタ, "種痘傳來" (2013), 岩波書店
  29. 김영수, "동아시아역사 속의 의사들" (2015)
  30. 김영수, "근대 일본의‘병원’: 용어의 도입과 개념형성을 중심으로", 의사학, 26(1), pp.29~58 (2017), 대한의사학회[DOI]
  31. 김영수, "근대 일본의 종두: 제도 정비와 실제", 의료사회사연구, 9, pp.5~29 (2022), 의료역사연구회
  32. 김영희, "근대일본의 공중위생관념 형성과정 - 지방순찰사복명서(地方巡察使復命書)를 중심으로 -", 일본학보, (102), pp.165~182 (2015), 한국일본학회
  33. 박병도, "근세 일본의 전염병과 재해의 상징화 －1862년의 분큐홍역대유행과 하시카에(はしか絵)의 등장－", 종교연구, 78(3), pp.147~182 (2018), 한국종교학회
  34. 신규환, "1870-80년대 일본의 콜레라 유행과 근대적 방역체계의 형성", 사림, (64), pp.253~278 (2018), 수선사학회[DOI]
  35. 호소연, "메이지 시기 묘지 제도와 위생: 장법과 묘지를 둘러싼 담론을 통하여", 일본역사연구, (48), pp.293~324 (2018), 일본사학회[DOI]
  36. 林志津江, "北里柴三郞｢日本におけるコレラ｣(1887年)", 北里大學一般敎育紀要, 20 (2015)
  37. 山崎達雄, "明治初期における塵芥處理制度に關する二, 三の考察-京都を中心として", 第3回日本土木史硏究會論文集 (1983)
  38. 山本志保, "明治前期におけるコレラ流行と衛生行政", 法政史學, 56 (2001)
  39. 上林茂暢, "公衆衛生の確率における日本と英國長与専斎とE.チャドウィックの果たした役割", 日本醫史學雜誌, 47(4) (2001)
  40. 上坂良子, "明治期の一避病院における看護管理の狀況", 日本醫史學雜誌, 52(1) (2006)
  41. 小島和貴, "コレラ豫防の｢心得書｣と長與專齋", 法學硏究 : 法律･政治･社會, 82(2) (2009)
  42. 小野芳朗, "明治期日本の公衆衛生に關する情報環境", 第4回日本土木史硏究會論文集 (1984)
  43. 市川智生, "近代日本の開港場における醫療･衛生と地域社會-橫濱の傳染病對策を中心として", 博士, 國際社會科學硏究科, pp.2007
  44. 遠城明雄, "傳染病･都市社會･衛生組合", 史淵, 152 (2015)
  45. 二谷智子, "1879年コレラ流行時の有力船主による防疫活動", 社會經濟史學, 75(3) (2009)
  46. 中静未知, "長野県小県郡川西伝染病院組合の設立-明治末〜大正期小県郡における隔離施設共有化の進行", 政経研究, 46(1) (2009)
  47. "地方通信-長崎縣醫事近況", 中外醫事新報, 248 (1890)

관련 논문AI추천

1870-80년대 일본의 콜레라 유행과 근대적 방역체계의 형성신규환수선사학회 · 사림2018 · 제64호근대 일본의‘병원’: 용어의 도입과 개념형성을 중심으로김영수대한의사학회 · 의사학2017 · 제26권 제1호식민지 시기 장티푸스예방접종에 관한 의학적 논의의 전개백선례의학사연구소 · 연세의사학2020 · 제23권 제2호식민지 공중위생 지식의 형성과 그 유산: 위생시험실의 활동을 중심으로박지영대한의사학회 · 의사학2022 · 제31권 제2호개항기 조선에서 근대적 위생문화의 수용강성우한일관계사학회 · 한일관계사연구2015 · 제52호1946년 한반도 콜레라 유행과 대응: 의학지식･예방접종･방역활동을 중심으로김진혁의학사연구소 · 연세의사학2025 · 제28권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

식민지시기 조선여학생의 東京女子醫學專門學校 유학과 귀국후 활동백옥경pp. 1-4720세기 초 미국의 정신이상 외국인(alien insane)과 이주장치 ― 증기선 회사와 사회복지단체를 통해 “삶의 복잡다단한 면” 살펴보기 ―신지혜pp. 81-130진단 체계의 탄생 ― 『정신장애의 진단 및 통계편람(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder: DSM-I)』을 중심으로 ―이남희pp. 131-158조선 초 道流僧의 역할과 그 사상사적 의미김수연pp. 159-190순정효황후(1894-1966)의 권업모범장 行啓와 收繭式남미혜pp. 191-225
원문 보기