1870-80년대 일본의 콜레라 유행과 근대적 방역체계의 형성
Cholera Epidemic and the Making of Modern Disinfection System in Japan in 1870-80
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Japan, there were at least three pandemics until 1860s after the cholera outbreak of Nagasaki and Shimonoseki in 1822. However, at this time, the Japanese government did not actively respond to the cholera. After the Meiji Restoration, the Meiji government established a hygienic bureau, and hygienic bureau began to produce official death statistics, which was a very lethal disease with a cholera mortality rate of 70%. At that time, Japan did not actively cope with cholera and other infectious diseases. The Japanese government wanted to respond to cholera through cultivating medical scientists capable of studying infectious diseases and improving legal systems. In particular, the Japanese government paid attention to building a healthcare system using police force. Nagayo Sensai, who led the maintenance of the Medical System in 1874 as the head of the first hygienic bureau, has divided the role of the central government and the role of the local government. During this period, Japan's anti-disinfection administration aimed at idealistic management of the role of physicians in central areas, and strengthening local autonomy. In particular, he expected the strengthening of hygiene administration by local autonomy. Nagayo has given an important role to the role of autonomous hygiene and physicians in the anti-disinfection administration, but when the cholera epidemic in 1879 became widespread, the responsibility for the actual anti-disinfection was unclear and it was difficult to expect many roles for the local government and the private sector in the anti-disinfection administration. Goto Shimpei, through local field experience, submitted opinions emphasizing autonomous hygiene and doctor’s role, and proposed Health Police with professional medical insight. As a result, Goto succeeded to Nagayo’s hygienic bureau. However, the cholera epidemic in 1880s made Nagayo and Goto aware of hygiene as an idealistic view. Although the role of physicians and police was institutionalized around the 1880 "Prevention Rule of Communicable Diseases", the superiority of the police was not legalized. Despite opposition from the police hygiene bureaucrats, the Meiji government transferred most of the hygiene to the police administration, and the sanitary police became more important in the administration of the police. Strengthening the status of the sanitary police in the process of cholera disinfection became an important feature in the construction of the Meiji eradication system, which was a surprising result of cholera epidemics.
Abstract
In Japan, there were at least three pandemics until 1860s after the cholera outbreak of Nagasaki and Shimonoseki in 1822. However, at this time, the Japanese government did not actively respond to the cholera. After the Meiji Restoration, the Meiji government established a hygienic bureau, and hygienic bureau began to produce official death statistics, which was a very lethal disease with a cholera mortality rate of 70%. At that time, Japan did not actively cope with cholera and other infectious diseases. The Japanese government wanted to respond to cholera through cultivating medical scientists capable of studying infectious diseases and improving legal systems. In particular, the Japanese government paid attention to building a healthcare system using police force. Nagayo Sensai, who led the maintenance of the Medical System in 1874 as the head of the first hygienic bureau, has divided the role of the central government and the role of the local government. During this period, Japan's anti-disinfection administration aimed at idealistic management of the role of physicians in central areas, and strengthening local autonomy. In particular, he expected the strengthening of hygiene administration by local autonomy. Nagayo has given an important role to the role of autonomous hygiene and physicians in the anti-disinfection administration, but when the cholera epidemic in 1879 became widespread, the responsibility for the actual anti-disinfection was unclear and it was difficult to expect many roles for the local government and the private sector in the anti-disinfection administration. Goto Shimpei, through local field experience, submitted opinions emphasizing autonomous hygiene and doctor’s role, and proposed Health Police with professional medical insight. As a result, Goto succeeded to Nagayo’s hygienic bureau. However, the cholera epidemic in 1880s made Nagayo and Goto aware of hygiene as an idealistic view. Although the role of physicians and police was institutionalized around the 1880 "Prevention Rule of Communicable Diseases", the superiority of the police was not legalized. Despite opposition from the police hygiene bureaucrats, the Meiji government transferred most of the hygiene to the police administration, and the sanitary police became more important in the administration of the police. Strengthening the status of the sanitary police in the process of cholera disinfection became an important feature in the construction of the Meiji eradication system, which was a surprising result of cholera epidemics.
참고문헌 (43)
- "愛知縣公立病院及醫學校第一報告中病院及醫學校建言書ㆍ院校將來須要諸件(自明治六年至同十三年), 後藤新平文書", 國立國會圖書館憲政資料室所蔵, ~
- 厚生省醫務局, "醫制百年史" (1874), 厚生省醫務局
- 厚生省醫務局, "醫制百年史" (1875), 厚生省醫務局
- "傳染病豫防規則", ~ (1880)
- "傳染病豫防法, 官報", ~ (1897)
- "虎列刺病豫防假規則", ~ (1879)
- "虎列刺病豫防假規則", ~ (1879)
- "虎列刺病豫防法心得", ~ (1877)
- 內務省社寺局, "虎列刺豫防諭解" (1880), 內務省社寺局
- 內務省衛生局, "衛生局年報" (1877)
- 大日本私立衛生會, "赤痢病における醫師の困難", 大日本私立衛生會雜誌, (130) (1894)
- 長與專齋, "衛生ト自治ノ關係", 大日本私立衛生會雜誌, 59 (1888)
- 長與專齋, "衛生意見", 國立國會圖書館憲政資料室所藏, 『大久保利通文書』 資料番號 327, ~ (1877)
- 關口隆吉, "地方巡察使復命資料" (1939), 地方巡察使復命資料刊行會
- 後藤新平, "健康警察醫官を設くべき建白, 後藤新平文書", 國立國會圖書館憲政資料室所蔵, ~
- 後藤新平, "都市計畵と自治の情神", 都市公論, 12(4) (1921)
- 吉良枝郞, "幕末から廢藩置縣まての西洋醫學" (2005), 築地書館
- 笠原英彦, "明治期醫療衛生行政の硏究 : 長與專齋から後藤新平へ" (2011), ミネルヴァ書房
- 寶月理惠, "近代日本における衛生の展開と受容" (2010), 東信堂
- 山本俊一, "日本コレラ史" (1982), 東京大學出版會
- 小川鼎三, "松本順自傳ㆍ長與專齋自傳" (1980), 平凡社
- 長與專齋, "松香私志" (1958), 醫齒藥出版
- 知念廣眞, "明治時代とことば : コレラ流行をめぐって" (1996), リーベル出版
- 後藤新平歿八十周年記念事業實行委員會, "後藤新平とは何か- 自治ㆍ公共ㆍ共生ㆍ平和: 都市デザイン" (2010), 藤原書店
- 厚生省醫務局, "醫制百年史" (1976)
- 김영수, "동아시아 역사 속의 의사들" (2015), 역사공간
- 김영희, "도시연구: 역사ㆍ사회ㆍ문화 2" (2009)
- 島和貴, "衛生官僚たちの內務省衛生行政構想と傳染病豫防法の制定(醫療政策と法-醫療を取り卷く諸政策を中心として", 法政論叢, 51(2) (2015)
- 笠原英彦, "近代日本における衛生行政論の展開 : 長與專齋と後藤新平", 法學硏究, 69(1) (1996)
- 笠原英彦, "明治十年代における衛生行政 : 後藤新平と日本的衛生槪念の形性", 法學硏究, 70(8) (1997)
- 笠原英彦, "明治前期における「自治衛生」と「衛生工事」", 法政論叢, 40(1) (2003)
- 笠原英彦, "長與專齋の「衛生意見」とアメリカ衛生行政", 法政論叢, 38(2) (2002)
- 山本志保, "明治前期におけるコレラ流行と衛生行政-福井縣を中心として", 法政史學, 56 (2001)
- 小島和貴, "コレラ予防の「心得書」と長與專齋", 法學硏究, 82(2) (2009)
- 小島和貴, "近代日本衛生行政における中央ㆍ地方關係--神奈川縣の事例を中心として", 政治經濟史學, 360 (1996)
- 小島和貴, "衛生官僚たちの内務省衛生行政構想と傳染病豫防法の制定(醫療政策と法-醫療を取り卷く諸政策を中心として", 法政論叢, 51(2) (2015)
- 小島和貴, "日本衛生政策の形成をめぐる行政過程", 法學政治學論究, 41 (1999)
- 小島和貴, "長與專齋の衛生行政論とコレラの流行", 人間福祉學會誌, 11(1) (2011)
- 小栗史朗, "地方衛生行政の創設過程" (1981), 醫療圖書出版社
- 阿部安成, "傳染病豫防の言說 : 近代轉換期の國民國家ㆍ日本と衛生", 歷史學硏究, 686 (1996)
- 安田健次郞, "西洋醫學の傳來と醫學のドイツ選擇", 慶應醫學, 84(2) (2007)
- 竹原万雄, "明治初期の衛生政策構想: 『內務省衛生局雜誌』を中心に", 日本醫史學雜誌, 55(4) (2009)
- 黃文雄, "後藤新平による臺灣近代化のための醫療敎育觀", 拓植大學百年史硏究, 6 (2001)
